In addition to
@Skigh's posted news from the DM, this
The Times article is fascinating and full of new nuggets, presuming they are accurate.
While most MSM reporting on the May 14, 2025 iterim report by the Italian Marine Accident Investigation Branch, cover likely yacht design flaws, this article eludes to possible crew errors.
"... With winds increasing, the captain decided to motor... to the more sheltered area of Porticello... As they arrived at about
9.30pm, another yacht, Sir Robert Baden Powell, lay at anchor near by."
"There was a faint breeze and the sea was calm, but thunderstorms were forecast and lightning flickered in the distance."
"As he turned in,
James Cutfield, the captain, told his crew to wake him if winds rose above 20 knots or if there were signs the anchor was not holding."
I wonder what time this was?
"
Matthew Griffiths, the deckhand on watch, recorded wind speeds of 8 knots."
I'm curious what time this was?
"He filmed the flashing sky on his phone and posted it on social media at 3.55am."
Why was Griffiths posting on SM given these data likely indicated worsening conditions?
"
The wind picked up, hitting 30 knots,..."
When was this precisely?
And when did the wind speed hit 20 knots, the captain's threshold for being woken?
Was wind speed > 20 knots before Griffith's SM post at 3:55am? or after his SM post?
"...and by 3.57am Griffiths thought the yacht was dragging its anchor..."
So, given the captain's order, why didn't Griffiths wake the captain immediately?
"A few minutes later,
at 4:00am, [Griffiths] woke Cutfield [the captain]..."
The obvious question is why the delay?
Because, as you can read on your own, this article details how rapidly things deteriorated after 4:00am. The captain apparently rapidly ran out of time to course correct and rouse all passengers.
It truly is a harrowing story told here.
So, IMO, there may be a 'micro' time table to piece together by the investigations as to what Griffiths was or was not doing between 3:50 and 4:00am.
I now wonder if the outcome would have been the same if Griffiths acted sooner.
ET: tighten text