Peliman
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2008
- Messages
- 6,766
- Reaction score
- 53
I did see and think I posted the link that Canada would not test their cows milk for radiation.
Well here's two statements from the Health Canada website to which the bottom of the page the link is referring to.
"Please note that as of March 25, 2011, the frequency of data collection by NRCan using the mobile surveys has been decreased due to the low levels of radiation being detected. The surveys will be repeated periodically and the data table will be updated. Health Canada has a large radiation detection and monitoring network composed of over 100 stations distributed across the country in strategic locations and major population centres. The amount of radiation from Japan being detected from these monitors is minuscule and does not pose a risk to the safety of our air, water, milk or agricultural products. To view published measurements from Health Canada, please visit the Fixed Point Surveillance Network website." Link provided with another statement.
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/ed-ud/respond/nuclea/_data/surveil-eng.php
The Naturalnews website jumps to this conclusion
"Yep, since they're detecting low levels of radiation, this is apparently justification for turning off the monitors altogether, which of course is the kind of brilliant early warning plan that could have only been dreamed up by a brain-dead bureaucrat. It's as if these morons are sitting around a table having a conversation that goes something like this: <snipped>
Someone please tell me how the jump is made to "turning off the monitors altogether"