Thanks. So there is testimony that the child had blood on her pyjamas, meaning that she was most likely wearing the same pyjamas she had on when she left the blood smears on the interior of the bathroom door ... unless she stepped, or sat, in the blood twice ... once before and once after she was changed. The simplest explanation is that she wore one pair of pyjamas on the night of the murder.
If she didn't change clothes, the whole theory about being taken away to be washed and given clean clothes just doesn't fit with the timeline or the evidence. What is the basis for the theory that the child was taken away from the house ... Meredith's keys on the car, the child's bloody pyjamas? Are there photos of the child's feet? Are there samples from nails, hands, and feet of child? We've been told that the child's feet were clean ... so where are the photos and where is the evidence. Surely that was documented ... given that it's a point of contention.
I think the basis of the theory the child was removed from the house is because she was found shockingly clean. The evidence points to her pj's being washed and placed back on her because Agent Holley's analysis showed blood that had soaked through on the seat but wasn't visible.
imo, there is no way she could have remained shockingly clean if she was left totally alone with her mother's bloody body in the same room.
The evidence shows either the child was removed from the entire scene or she remained in the home with someone preventing her from being near her mother's body.
I don't believe any toddler would place a doll next to her mom's silent body and then totally ignore her mother from that point on. Any parent who has wanted to sleep in on a Saturday morning knows a toddler's focus is on trying to get Mommy and or Daddy to wake-up until they either get up or let toddler crawl into bed with them.
I also don't believe CY witnessed the murder. She went to bed and from Shelly's testimony, she was finally asleep before Shelly left the house that night. So CY was used to her parents having other people in the house AND yet her parents maintained a routine for her and their guests were a comfortable part of that routine. Jason most definitely knew his child's routine.
If Jason had been the killer, the first thing he would have done when he went upstairs would be to close the door to CY's bedroom. And after Michelle hit the floor would be to check on CY to see if she was still asleep. If she had awakened--he would have returned her to her own bed. If she had become bloody herself, he would have carried her into the bathroom, cleaned her and placed her into her own bed. Placing her on his side of the bed when neither he or her mother was in it was not part of her routine.
If Jason was the killer, the last thing JY would have allowed would be for his daughter to walk around the bloody corpse to place a doll there because he would know there was no way he could later prevent CY from mentioning this fact when speaking with LE or from telling LE what she witnessed.
Jason wasn't present when Michelle and CY were found. Jason had absolutely no control over whether LE would interview CY or what evidence would be collected.
I just can't get to a conclusion of guilty in this case.