Welcome back, zapped.
Glad you're standing again and here![]()
Thank you! Is good to be back and see the wheels of justice are turning albeit slowly in this case. Less chance for mistakes that way.
Welcome back, zapped.
Glad you're standing again and here![]()
I forgot the courts have the motions posted! Full motion at link:
http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/courts...thew-jr/commonwealth-v-jesse-l-matthew-jr.htm
Public defender Dawn Butorac had said her clients constitutional rights were being obliterated, because she didnt have sufficient time to process DNA analyses, which were provided recently.
After Schells ruling, Butorac told the judge this case is coming back, on appeal. The judge did not respond to Butoracs statement.
http://wtop.com/fairfax-county/2015/05/fairfax-judge-denies-delay-for-jesse-matthew-trial/
I am sure his public defender has other cases to take care of besides his. They should have granted the delay.
Defense not happy, indeed
http://wtop.com/fairfax-county/2015/05/fairfax-judge-denies-delay-for-jesse-matthew-trial/
Short and sweet order denying continuance now posted. There is also a court order to go ahead and keep JM in Fairfax rather than return him to Albemarle.I forgot the courts have the motions posted! Full motion at link:
http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/courts...thew-jr/commonwealth-v-jesse-l-matthew-jr.htm
I hate to even post this, but the court has uploaded the latest motion from the defense to suppress possible ID by the victim. Unfortunately, they include the victim's name and other identifying information. Not good!!
I'm afraid this is a tactic by the defense to hopefully get the victim to back out and not testify. I am sure she is terrified as is, but now they have publicly identified her and that may throw her over the edge. I hope media outlets do not take the bait and publish this, in respect for her and for the integrity of the case. They could have easily referred to her by her initials. I'm pretty angry over this.
ETA: and thank you, Hoosgirl, for not posting the direct link.
I'm afraid this is a tactic by the defense to hopefully get the victim to back out and not testify. I am sure she is terrified as is, but now they have publicly identified her and that may throw her over the edge. I hope media outlets do not take the bait and publish this, in respect for her and for the integrity of the case. They could have easily referred to her by her initials. I'm pretty angry over this.
ETA: and thank you, Hoosgirl, for not posting the direct link.
I hate to even post this, but the court has uploaded the latest motion from the defense to suppress possible ID by the victim. Unfortunately, they include the victim's name and other identifying information. Not good!!