Been reading the old thread and catching up.
Apparently, the closed door evidentiary hearing from last week may have had something to do with the admissibility of Jodis story that she walked in on Travis masturbating to computer pics of little boys. And that this bit of (fabricated, imo) testimony will somehow provide the information necessary for the jury to find in Jodis favor of self defense.
Now, Im faaaaaarrrr from being any kind of psychosexual expert (lol!!). However, my decidedly lay (no pun intended) person observation is that Jodi has attempted to portray Travis as a multi-tasking sexual deviant. As in, one with many fetishes.
And that just doesnt ring true for me, on a number of levels. Typically, from what I have read, fetishists are not very open minded to lots of different kinds of kink. They usually have one or 2 scenarios that really turn them onnot many.
And it would be exceedingly rare (if not impossible) to find someone who is turned on by BOTH multifaceted heterosexual adult kink, as well as gay pedophile non-consensual kink. So rare, that SOMEONE would have come out of the woodwork to corroborate the multifaceted het and gay pedo sex by now, if it were true. We would see lots of computer searches. A person cant hide something like that, and still troll for partners. We would have seen SOMETHING to support thatcomputer searches for Mormon heterosexual fetish and gay pedophile dating sitesor something! Its just inconceivable to me that one human could have so many DIFFERENT kinks he was supposedly into, without a SINGLE other person (besides the accused) to corroborate. If I were a jury member, Id have to label all that lies.
And I might as well throw this in, as wellkinksters are almost never actual abusers. Consensual adult BDSM is NOT sexual abuse, EVEN if it hurts so bad you have to stay stop, stop, stop thru clenched teeth, Jodi. (Consider that an opinion, as I dont have a link handy, lol!)
About the only thing we havent heard yet from Jodi is bestiality (run, Napolean, run!), orgy sex/ swinging, and fully engaged BDSM lifestyle sex. But Jodi isnt off the stand yet, so poor Napolean is still at risk, imo. And Im also somewhat surprised that she hasnt sold out some of the Mormon friends they had, accusing them of swinging group sex or some such thing. (But then again, group sex would take Jodi out of the starring (willing victim) role, so I dont think well hear much of THAT.)
Enough of the Jodi filibuster. Bring on the cross X.
(JA may want to consider wearing some protection when JM begins, since the photographic evidence of the condition of her anal sphincters may indicate the risk of involuntary soiling on the witness stand.)