Yeah, what the heck was that all about? I wasn't on the boards yet at that point but saw the testimony. She "lost" her phone 8 days after the recording (8 days, not 7... according to her) and then it "resurfaced" a few years later?
What's the deal there?
She is a vicious murderer. But watching the prosecutor treat her like she was a worm under a magnifying glass makes me uncomfortable.
She's ruined cinnabon yesterday and biscotti today. Oi.
Sent from my HTCEVOV4G using Tapatalk 2
Get out the wooden spoon! :floorlaugh:
I'm not sure this kind of talk making you feel uncomfortable makes you a prude. A prude, to me, won't even consider anything outside of vanilla sex, including foreplay...it's intercourse for the sole purpose of reproduction and nothing else...that, to me, is a prude. It's natural to be embarrassed to be looking into the window of someone else's sex life, in fact I would think it strange if everyone didn't feel a tad embarrassed by this talk.
I know I turned BEET red when Juan used the "p" word, but I did NOT turn beet red when Jodi used it. Figure that out. Ah ha ha ha
IMO, Jodi is laughing and smirking because she has "forced" the prosecutor to say "embarrassing" sex slang in open court. She doesn't get it that he is impeaching her. She thinks she is winning because he is blurting out sex slang, and that he is "shocked" by that.
She has forced the entire court system to focus on her SEX activities.
She is hoping that the jury can't get beyond the SHOCK of the sex slang.
Which lends a lot of validity to those here who believe she was the abusive personality in this relationship.God almighty ... she begs him to call her, text her .. so often.