they did, they said the entire computer and its memory have no porn, no nudity, nothing, not on the phone either, not even in deleted memory clusters
Thank you kindly Stephanie! :seeya: And
was this information presented to the jurors? That is where that information would be best served as it would help the jurors decide whether TA was a pedo or had hyper sexuality as JA claims. Whether he was one or the other actually shouldn't matter but may give a better indication JA is a liar once again.
OK this is JMO and :twocents: worth and I've only watched the on-line trial posts (Youtube) from day one, and read a wee bit from WS posters.
If I was on that jury, I would find JA guilty of premeditated 1st degree murder and sentence her to the DP. To me it is so apparent JA has lied about so many things and a lot of it seems so fabricated. NO ONE in their right mind would remember ALL the finer details which she seems to remembers. BUT how convenient, she cannot remember the most important part of the murder. The FACT that she killed him and HOW she killed him speaks volumes. This is not a woman who is defending herself. A woman defending herself would have ran out of that house. IMO Jodi does NOT suffer from abused woman syndrome. I stated my belief on this subject way back; she is too self assured, arrogant, independent and blameless/narcissistic. The way she smirks on the stand and defends herself tells me she would not stand for anyone "bullying" her physically, verbally or emotionally. Again JMO.
To me it appears she wanted everything TA had and him. I do believe he did not see Jodi as someone he could connect with as a soul mate, but only someone who suited his sexual desires. Whether she introduced him to sex, or whether he had had multiple sex partners prior to or during his time with Jodi, to me is JMO irrelevant Mormon or not. It was something both enjoyed and partook in and I for one do not believe at any time Jodi was not a willing participant.
It seems to me once TA started to give her the "push off", she became obsessed with pushing herself right back at him. She figure if she was going to make him love her and want her, and she figured sex was the ticket. When it became apparent to her TA was involved with other women and there was no hope of getting him back other then for sex, she probably felt somewhat used sexually (JA's claim, like used toilet paper or a prostitute), and this angered/hurt her enough that day she knew what the end result was going to be (if she didn't hear what she wanted so desperately to hear from TA), as she had premeditated it for some time. By the end of their day together on June 4th she knew for certain she was being used by TA for his sexual pleasures and more than likely there was no talk of them getting back together or future together. He was heading off to Cancun with another woman; not Jodi, his travel plans were final and that irked her all the more so she killed him savagely. I for one do not believe the BWS theory the defense is claiming. Bottom line; she killed TA, not in self defense but in anger and jealousy. Premeditated and carried out and for that, I feel she deserves the DP. All :moo:
Why battered women don't leave or remain silent
Fear, lack of resources, lack of finances and economic reality, children, feelings of guilt, promises of reform, sex-role conditioning, religious beliefs and values, societal disbelief concerning battered men, love for spouse.
http://www.heart-2-heart.ca/women/page4.htm