jodi arias TAKES THE STAND FOR 15TH DAY #71*may contain graphic and adult content*i

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #241
What on earth is causing this delay?
 
  • #242
  • #243
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleuth21
There is nothing I love more than a good courtroom brawl. I love to see both sides duke it out with some style even if I'm squarely in one side's corner. I CAN NOT take any more Nurmi!!! I'm a crim defense attorney. Even though I am on Juan's side I could appreciate a good defense in this case. This is just horrible. He may be the worst I've seen and some of my colleagues are dull and lame in the extreme. He's so sloooooow. I have to believe if I'm totally over this redirect then the jury has to be hating Nurmi and his client holding them hostage for this crap and not at least hitting the high notes quickly and with a little style.
Rant over. So glad to have my fellow WS'ers to understand how this makes me feeeeeel. I think I would be furious if I were a juror listening to this drivel day after day.

This is not a battered woman no matter how they spin it. This is not a woman


who was beaten year after year by a man she could not escape or who wouldn't let her go no matter what she did. This is not a woman who finally gave into the fear or even some rage after horrible, crushing abuse. It's not like she watched this man beat her, the kids and the pets for a decade. She is the antithesis of a battered woman. SHE wouldn't leave HIM alone. HE was the victim of an abusive relationship with a manipulative and intrusive woman. Ugh!!!


Brought this over from the previous thread because It's just an excellent post. I have been wondering what the Attorneys in here are feeling. Thank you so much for posting this.As a battered woman myself, it's been very unsettling to see Nurmi portraying Jodi as a battered woman. I do not see one thing in Jodi that I feel myself from being Battered. I see Jodi as self assured, smug, independent, a fighter and one that has no real fear of anything but the consequences of the act that she chose to commit. I got out of my 29 year nightmare with my ex 13 years ago, and am STILL in recovery, finding my self esteem and assertiveness. Still learning to stand up for myself. Jodi shows no sign at all of ever being abused that I can see. She is definitely not making me feel the sympathy and understanding for a battered woman. All I can feel for her is : OFF WITH HER HEAD:
 
  • #244
What is the holdup????
 
  • #245
I told my husband Trutv was not carrying the trial anymore. He said "probably because of the sex talk, I am sick of hearing about it."

He is 70 yrs old.

He believes she is guilty and should get the death penalty, as do I.
 
  • #246
This and the fact that she so blatantly just threw him under the bus about unregistered guns. She probably knows full well, that he has flipped!

There are plenty of unregistered guns in Texas...you don't have to register guns that you've had forever. Some might not know that and go register them..
 
  • #247
one of the commenters on hln said he thinks these entries brought up were written after the fact, as a defense tactic. i would put nothing past her. devious and dishonest to the max.

I got my suspicions about a whole bunch of evidence! :waitasec:
 
  • #248
Thanks for the link. Can someone explain or show on a photo or diagram exactly where the area is shown in #118 in the first slide show?

I'm confused by experts saying the camera had to be on the floor, button face down, and stepped on when #119 was taken since it was upside down. To me it seems that JA was wearing the camera by the neck strap and that #119 was taken as she was bending over dragging TA's body, and gravity turned the camera upside down. I just now tried it with my camera on a neck strap and replicated the shot easily.

That being the case, it would seem to me that #118, which is right side up, was taken as JA was attacking TA and either her torso moved backward or the violent movement made the camera bounce upward. Thoughts, anyone?

Also, can anyone explain how, if the timer function wasn't being used, how it could happen that all 22 photos in the shower and dragging sequence were even-numbered seconds, while at least one of the earlier photos--the one of TA at 1:47:15--was an odd-numbered second? Or why the camera kept taking photos more than 2 minutes (62 seconds and 76 seconds respectively) after the ceiling shot?

On second thought, none of it matters, only that (hopefully) the jury will come to the right decision.

just a couple of points:

when the trial first started, one of the CSI members testified that the camera strap was still in the camera bag, and in its original wrapping.... meaning it was never used.

they are saying the camera was upside down in the dragging picture, because when they took the SD card out of the camera, the picture was TAKEN upside down, meaning the image they retrived from the SD was upside down. The camera most likely got scooted (is that a word) around the floor when she attacked him and when she was bringing him back into the bathroom, she backed into it, and the shutter button hit the floor, therefore the picture was upside down.

Not that I beleive what she says, but there is some truth to her lies.
I believe her when she said she didnt know how the camera settings worked. TA had just gotten the camera, and she hadnt seen it yet, which is probably why they used his camera for the pictures and (supposedly) her camera for the movies, cause she couldnt figure out how to work the settings and such.

That part, I do find believeable.
 
  • #249
Ok y'all first day of work done... Anything worth anything or just nurmi wailing?

Nah...but apparently she had various guns to choose from as well as cars. :waitasec:
 
  • #250
I don't know about y'all, but of none of the guys I've know - bfs and just friends - ever "jokingly" asked a girl to marry them. Just sayin'....
Guys here??? What say you??

No, no, no! That's a problem no guy wants to deal with if she thinks it's real.

I don't think I have even seen a trial, or one of those shows about crimes, where a victim was so thoroughly trashed, without one bit of evidence. Not one bit of proof. And only coming from the cold-sored mouth of the killer.

From the CA trial, I am sick of defense attorneys and their lying clients being able to say any freaking thing they want with no evience to back it up.

For instance WHY can't Jodi's stalkish behavior (tire slashing) be brought up? Even though there is no concrete proof? Why is she allowed to talk about Travis accusing him of being a pedophile, of abusing her, relaying things he said to her with no freaking proof?

IIRC, one of the lawyers here said that defenses that trash the victim rarely win.
 
  • #251
  • #252
Question: Would the defense know if JM has MM as a state's witness?
 
  • #253
This and the fact that she so blatantly just threw him under the bus about unregistered guns. She probably knows full well, that he has flipped!

Agreed. This throwing of Matt under the bus is a pre-emptive strike. They want to sully him before he hits the stand.
 
  • #254
Perhaps that's why she threw him under the bus!

Now he'll probably have the ATF knocking on his door by midnight!

She's somethin'
:moo:
fran

If ATF does knock on his door, he can make a deal and tell them everything he knows about JA :)
 
  • #255
Dwane Gates on with Vinnie right now is certifiable!
 
  • #256
Late again? At this rate, the trial will last until Memorial Day.

:floorlaugh: That's a conservative estimate, I was thinking more like Independence Dayosj....Maybe the jury verdict will come back on the 2-year anniversay of FCA's jury verdict but with a much different verdict!
 
  • #257
  • #258
I never said Ibelieved he died in sexual sin I said JODI in her warped mind probably thought that. She was out to make him into a bad MORMON and trash him in every way was my point. Please read the context of what is being written before implying that I believed that at all.

One of Travis' friends stated on a facebook post that JODI (not you or me, or anyone I know) thought this very thing. He wrote a beautiful post about how wrong she is and Travis is just fine, this I know we do believe. I know his family knows this also. :)
 
  • #259
MM was who the magazine message was meant for. He did pretty much say that he would lie for her and Jodi was convinced of it. He was also the one that she claimed had supposedly seen the bruises on her neck from the strangling claim, and JA said that they had talked about it. Juan asked her if she was sure about that, so he suggested that they call MM on the phone in court. They did call and MM said that he had never seen any bruises on JA and had never had any discussion with JA about TA supposedly strangling her. The look on her face was priceless. Matt obviously has had a change of heart about his willingness to lie for Jodi!!!

I have not seen that footage. Is there a link to this somewhere?
 
  • #260
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
140
Guests online
2,774
Total visitors
2,914

Forum statistics

Threads
632,199
Messages
18,623,483
Members
243,056
Latest member
Urfavplutonian
Back
Top