I saw Jodi hiding behind her hair as blatant consciousness of guilt. JMO
I think it's an act put on for the jury's benefit. It's her attempt to mimic genuine sadness
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I saw Jodi hiding behind her hair as blatant consciousness of guilt. JMO
Wow didn't think about that. I did think about the fact that she didn't hide when they showed the close up of her vajayjay in court.
eta- guess she's lucky the hot ME didn't testify related to anything on that picture!
Could the "pants" we see in this photo actually be these gym shorts that were in the evidence?
did they really show a picture like that in court?
I missed that one!:rocker:
Ok...for those still puzzling about the photo of JA dragging TA...this should help:
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/album.php?albumid=1674
I personally feel like it is a possibility or that he has a pair of long pants that are similar to those in the pic. I just don't see how she would keep any of his pants up even with a draw string thru a struggle and slipping in blood such as this crime scene. I think that is why she wiped the floor. She was slipping and falling in it.
Yep and as other ladies here have pointed out, he is attractive, so I bet this is just killing her!
thank you! that is very helpful and I can see it now... now I want to look at it without the outlines again and it will most likely pop right out at me
Yep And the more I think about your other post the more I enjoy the thought because she really did look like crap yesterday. I hope he is recalled at some point in the trial just for this reason!
I am not convinced we really know what is in this photo. DA seems to say you can see her "foot". Not once have I heard it used as the word "shoe". With that being said, I don't think the spot on the floor looks like a foot, I think it's just coincidence. The sense of scale is WAY off for it to be TA's or JA's foot.
I also saw the outline of the shoe that someone posted earlier. Was she wearing all black shoes? I have a hard time believing so. I'm still not convinced. Also, keep in mind that the PHOTO ON THE CAMERA WAS TAKEN UPSIDE DOWN. So this would have been the true orientation on the camera. Does this help anyone??
It bothers me that his head and arm appear 'up'. Still alive?
Looking at the 'dragging' photo, is it possible the seam we see is the bottom edge of her shorts? She is on her knees or sitting back somewhat on her calves? It looks like the bottom of those nike shorts have a typical hem, or double seam. And at 5'4 and 115, it would take a very low center of gravity to pull his body along.
thank you! that is very helpful and I can see it now... now I want to look at it without the outlines again and it will most likely pop right out at me
yes in court and a close up no less during opening arguments.