Can anyone name a better looking defendant?
Yes but I am not going to spend my time searching for something like that, sorry.

Can anyone name a better looking defendant?
well and even where all the blood was in the car. it sounds like a lot was in the backseat. Did she come back to her car to get the gun? did she get blood everywhere when she was transporting the knife or maybe she had another blood covered person in the car with her.
Claudine Georgette Longet?
I can only try. The state's concerned if the jury learns Jodi stalked Travis it could unfairly bias them which could lead to a guilty verdict which could lead to an appeal. An appeal that could and possibly would overturn a conviction.
Jodi was never convicted of stalking Travis and even had she been it may have been ruled inadmissible. Not sure on that one though. Some prior bad acts are allowed in.
To all the nurses here, God bless you all for the work you do. Can you elaborate on what you mean by noisy? I feel like JHole with my morbid curiosity, but I'm wondering if you mean vocally noisy or something else. Thanks!
That french model chick that was married to Andy Williams and shot the ski instructor. I don't remember her name and I am too lazy to look it up.
Can anyone name a better looking defendant?
I know opening statements aren't evidence, so if the stalker statement was only made in opening statements, I guess there wouldn't be any issue regarding "stalker evidence" on appeal.
Mimi's Cross Exam.
Jodi Arias Trial Day 1 (Audio Only) - YouTube
Nurmi "he told you he had a stalker"
Mimi "he told me he had a stalker, she followed us on a date, I was really scared"
Nurmi "he didn't say this was Jodi, correct?"
ETA: 2:30:30 the stalker stuff begins.
:great:Hi, BritsKate. Jodi's history with Travis, including stalking, is definitely in. (Some conjectural things, like the tire-slashing might be minimized or excluded.) Her history with Lisa is out, probably for multiple reasons.
I was with my friend when she was removed from life support and we were warned there would be some noise. There was some gurgling noise and I was surprised how loud it was. To be honest it was disturbing. It went on for a bit as her body shut down. It was very sad and etched in my memory.
BTW This is the Lisa we're all talking about:
![]()
I'm not going to sit and watch the video, what is the point? What was Mimi's answer?
Is there a reason I should be bothered by jurors questions?
Awesome!Let me see what I can do.
The point is that Nurmi explored the stalker accusations on cross exam, and this is what Martinez was referring to today.
I was watching on my phone while waiting for my car...I thought my head would explode!
I am not happy!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hi, PolleyPockets. I think that they are making the right decision. Bestselling novelist David Baldacci said that some of the best narratives that he ever constructed were put together when he was a lawyer. Lawyers are storytellers. In this case, a shorter story not only keeps it safe from a mistrial; it is also more persuasive because it's uncluttered.[/
John Hepworth
One of the things that really bothers me about this trial is the way the defense is trying to demonize Travis. Travis was one of the nicest people I have ever met. He opened his home to me when I needed it. I was in the kitchen when he and Jodi broke up. There was no yelling. They sat down in the front room and Travis explained to her that the relationship was not going anywhere. I was in the house when Travis caught Jodi reading his gmail. There was no threats of violence. There was a time when Travis was pretty upset with me because of something that I had disclosed to a mutual friend. He had a right to be upset with me. Travis told me that he wished that I respected him enough to talk to him instead of behind his back. Travis was a kind, cheritable soul who would literaly give you the shirt off his back if you needed it. He remains an example to me.