Joel Alan Brodsky

[Littledeer]

LOL...........

Fran, I beat you by half a second!

 

[Dobler]

was the "short-term" goal- to tick everybody off?

 

[SuziQ]

was the "short-term" goal- to tick everybody off?

No kidding!

 

[fran]

LOL...........

Fran, I beat you by half a second!

Yeah I know!

 

[chicoliving]

A caller with the question...Has Drew sold his airplane or boat or any personal things to raise money for his "fund" His esteemed attorney replies no, but he will have to soon. waa waaa waaaa

 

[fran]

A caller with the question...Has Drew sold his airplane or boat or any personal things to raise money for his "fund" His esteemed attorney replies no, but he will have to soon. waa waaa waaaa

I wonder when he's going to start looking for his lost wife?:doh:

Oh, wait, he's more worried about his defense!

Never mind, he probably knows where she is anyway.:chicken:

JMHO
fran

 

[chicoliving]

Yep he's got some odd priorities all righty!

 

[mysteriew]

A caller with the question...Has Drew sold his airplane or boat or any personal things to raise money for his "fund" His esteemed attorney replies no, but he will have to soon. waa waaa waaaa

He can't sell that plane! His children need the plane. And what will he hand down to them when he dies if he sells his personal items! And he needs the cars back so that he can give one of them to his son who will be old enough to drive in a few years. And the guns- ahh now the guns, he needs all 11 in order to protect himself and his children against the world!

 

[NascarMom]

I wonder when he's going to start looking for his lost wife?:doh:

Oh, wait, he's more worried about his defense!

Never mind, he probably knows where she is anyway.:chicken:

JMHO
fran

I'm hoping FBI has tapped his phones and/or bugged his house. He's got to slip up sooner or later.

 

[Taximom]

JAB's email (or text) to Greta today:

JAB through his wife: Tell Jerry Springer and her panel of 8th graders that her circus will have to go on without me.

 

[nanandjim]

JAB's email (or text) to Greta today:

JAB through his wife: Tell Jerry Springer and her panel of 8th graders that her circus will have to go on without me.

I knew this piece of crap would back out. What a loser.

 

[SuziQ]

Taximom found this link I had lost, nice Jerry Springer couple Brodsky and his wife are. Their child had to be hospitalized due to their immaturity!

http://www.ilnb.uscourts.gov/JudgeSquires/Opinions/99a00069.pdf

 

[philamena]

Yep he's got some odd priorities all righty!

The odd thing to me is that he hasn't had priorities right from the day Stacy disappeared but he thinks the general public is too stoopid to see him for what he is. :loser:

 

[Camper]

Watched Greta last night of course.

Someone tell me how large JAB's practice is, how large is his firm? How many attorneys in the office IF it is not his own practice, I know of course about JPC.

He obviously has had some 'coaching' about dealing with the media, and the ethical practice of law in general. He needs to make a phone call to Mark Geragos just to be more comfy in his approach.

I am still wondering what caused the removal of media from DP's neighborhood? I am hoping it was out of regard for DP's children. I am guessing the neighbors may have taken up arms after that DINGBAT that wrote PIG in the snow - for the children to see.

.

 

[mysteriew]

I think we may need to start and "According to JAB" thread soon. His statements are almost as outrageous as DrewP's.

Drew Peterson's attorney, Joel Brodsky of Chicago, was confident the police investigation would get to the bottom of the two mysteries surrounding the fates of Drew Peterson's last two wives, but blamed an impatient public for rushing to judge his client.

"I see a real mob mentality out there, and it's scary," Brodsky said.

He said he could envision "the rope over the tree in Drew's backyard. If this was Oklahoma in 1870, I'd be scared."

http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/696779,4_1_JO14_PETERSON_S1.article

But just suppose (I don't believe he is that "scared") but just suppose he is. Do they really expect us to believe that DrewP is scareder than a wife who had been threatened by her husband- the husband who was right with her every day, the husband who monitored her activities, a husband who had already used physical violence and a husband who knew her schedule? Somehow, I don't believe that he is quite that scared yet.

 

[Littledeer]

In one way I want to tape both BRODSKY'S AND DP'S MOUTH SHUT, so I don't have to hear any more STUPID STUPID STUPID comments out of their mouths.

But then, I stepped back and realized, they are just digging their own coffin by talking. (Putting duct tape away until needed for a more useful purpose).

 

[curiositycat]

I think we may need to start and "According to JAB" thread soon. His statements are almost as outrageous as DrewP's.

Drew Peterson's attorney, Joel Brodsky of Chicago, was confident the police investigation would get to the bottom of the two mysteries surrounding the fates of Drew Peterson's last two wives, but blamed an impatient public for rushing to judge his client.

"I see a real mob mentality out there, and it's scary," Brodsky said.

He said he could envision "the rope over the tree in Drew's backyard. If this was Oklahoma in 1870, I'd be scared."

http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/696779,4_1_JO14_PETERSON_S1.article

But just suppose (I don't believe he is that "scared") but just suppose he is. Do they really expect us to believe that DrewP is scareder than a wife who had been threatened by her husband- the husband who was right with her every day, the husband who monitored her activities, a husband who had already used physical violence and a husband who knew her schedule? Somehow, I don't believe that he is quite that scared yet.

Well, sometimes I wish it was Oklahoma in 1870. If things get much worse out there it may become very much like that. His client is not a "lovable" guy. They had better pray for a jury with few women IF it gets that far. Has DP ever had a thought about women he didn't verbalize in a negative way? Sexied up??? PMSing??? Crazy??? Depressed???? I am sure there are more but those are the ones that really tick me off. :angel:

 

[mysteriew]

Well, sometimes I wish it was Oklahoma in 1870. If things get much worse out there it may become very much like that. His client is not a "lovable" guy. They had better pray for a jury with few women IF it gets that far. Has DP ever had a thought about women he didn't verbalize in a negative way? Sexied up??? PMSing??? Crazy??? Depressed???? I am sure there are more but those are the ones that really tick me off. :angel:

LOL, somehow I don't think it has crossed either of their minds that there will most likely be women on that jury! In their minds of course, women shouldn't be out of the home and in the courtroom.