The first comment about OJ Simpson refers to Americans believing in OJ Simpson's guilt even though there's not much evidence. Whereas people are willing to give John Ramsey a pass.
I think John Ramsey promotes these theories about Patsy, Burke, neighbors and routine intruders. Because it should be the other way around - that people think John Ramsey is guilty but think OJ Simpson is probably not guilty.
Plus OJ Simpson was arrested and charged, just not convicted. Whereas John was not arrested and charged. In terms of motive, John Ramsey had motive to silence JB from reporting PREVIOUS sexual abuse. (Because of the armed robbery with oj simpson, I think Simpson may be guilty. Perhaps simpson originally hired the killers, and then owed organized crime a favor.)
John's older daughter from his first marriage, who was named Elizabeth, also accused John of sexual abuse. Six weeks later, she died in the car accident. That's why the car accident was reinvestigated after the murder, though I certainly don't think it's suspicious. But that's the reason for reinvestigation. Look at John's family - his father married his first wife's mother! That was after the first wife (John's mother) died. When the father remarried, it was to John's first wife's mother.
Also I think Nancy Krebs is credible, though some of her details may be embellished. Krebs testified about the same issues and details years prior to JB's murder. It's not as if Krebs came up with the details after JB's murder. Remember about the child
and prostitution, and that's what the accusations against Access Graphics and Subic Bay are about.
And I do think Fleet White may have been involved. He was always so anxious to endorse the theories that Patsy or Burke did it, or that it was supposedly an accident. But maybe he was just anxious because the Ramseys were framing him, as being the "Secret Santa."
<modsnip: Removed political commentary>
