Jose Baez has his own podcast. "What's juicy? What's sexy?"

[passionflower]

I'm sick, really.........JB makes me want to barf...............not kidding!

 

[RR0004]

The job of the prosecutor is not to win the case but to ensure that truthful evidence comes forward.

Regarding cross examination....It's not about twisting the evidence, it's about putting it to the test. If it is true it can't be discredited.

He shares a case he tried that included a shooting. He said there was lots of blood....that LE didn't take dna swabs and test for gun shot residue. He shared that the jury was frustrated (or was it frushtrated???) that LE didn't take adequate samples.

People forget that KC is human. That she could easily be anyone's daughter or friend.

There are experts that live and breathe a case....then there are experts that do the bare minimum and charge for every minute on the case. You have to find a middle ground. If the expert seems too emotionally invested in the case.....they will not be perceived as an independent opinion.
You have to find that middle ground.

He knows that his every move will be more heavily scrutinized than normal. It requires he do double work. He states that he makes no move without consulting all the other attorneys working on the case before acting. ( IMO I doubt that)

He states that you are always scrutinized and analyzed by those that know less than you do. ( ummmmmmmmmm :rolling: )

Commenting on why he is was not well known...
because most of his trials were in the hispanic community. The English community didn't know a lot about him because of the language issue.

Many lawyers have been VERY gratuitous in their advice. (is that because he can't pay for consulting???)

The problems he has encountered in this case are such rare issues that even lawyers with much more experience were unable to advise.


Pearls of wisdom from JB if someone gets stopped by the popo.....
One should not feel that they are not cooperating if they do not speak to LE.
You should always have an attorney present.
If you speak without an attorney present your words can be misinterpreted and used to wrongfully convict you.

BBM: 31 days...

 

[RR0004]

I interupt this thread to "pause for a thought to consider".....If JB feels it necessary to second guess his actions, give additional consideration to his decisions, and to consult with all the other members of his team....PRIOR TO taking action........Were they in full support of him giving this self aggrandizing interview? Did Andrea offer her stamp of approval on this podcast?

It also seems to be that JB feels the heat of his critics and is just a tad insecure, don't ya think?

 

[RR0004]

Shouldn't he be finishing up on the one he started??? Time for all these media appearances but no time to do a witness list, take depos, do what they normally do to prepare for trial. JMO

You would think?
Tactical move...I guess he sees his career getting flushed. I truly wonder if he sees himself going the distance.

 

[ynotdivein]

OK my inner semantics prof is chomping at the bit on this.

Jose feels that the general public has a detachment with the case. he compares it to a video game where you have violent games yet players are detached from it.

OK. I can see this. It's true of many cases that make news "blips"--but in this case the general public has had ample opportunity to see discovery and to form an emotional attachment to the highly sympathetic murder victim. This is not Grand Theft Auto writ large, JB.

The next series of thoughts is interesting:

The media is responsible because of the old saying.."When it bleeds, it leads."

Viewers =dollars .

"What is juicy? What is sexy?"

"When it bleeds, it leads" is a well-known media cliche, referring to bloody/deadly crimes leading "boring" items like state budgets on the nightly news, etc. There's a child's murder at hand here. And yeah, maybe people tune in to the gruesome. And maybe that equates to more viewers, for what it's worth. I'll let him off the hook for that statement.

But to hop from that to "what is juicy? what is sexy?" is um... a leap to say the least. He could have said "what is compelling?" or "what is going to keep viewers watching?" or... well, anything more professional than "juicy/sexy." At the very least, he should know that by now, his client will in no way benefit from him using such words.

Even if he was only trying to point the finger at a media system that does in fact follow every jiggle of Paris Hilton's new boob job, the last thing he should want to do is link "juicy" and "sexy" with KC in ANYone's minds.

MOO, of course...

 

[cecybeans]

I think some JB quotes (and the threads we include them in) should have a high colonic alert...

 

[ZsaZsa]

I think some JB quotes (and the threads we include them in) should have a high colonic alert...

I was thinking a BS alert, but you're close enough..:innocent:

 

[gogrannypop]

:snake::sick::sick::sick::loser::twocents:

 

[100%Agave]

JB is an Ummmmmmm, yeah, okay, uhhhhhh, what to say, what to say, ummmmmmm,

No Comment!

 

[Eidetic]

Baez and sexy just don't fit in the same sentence...:sick:

5:58 he snorted a bit of air through his pharynx while inhaling before responding to her lol

 

[Trapshooter]

His "test"....."if they can explain it to me, they can explain it to anyone."

Respectfully snipped

This is my favorite!!! I picture Jose with the E-Trade babies!!! Milkaholic! Milkawhat? ROTFL!!!!

 

[mitzi]

The job of the prosecutor is not to win the case but to ensure that truthful evidence comes forward.

Regarding cross examination....It's not about twisting the evidence, it's about putting it to the test. If it is true it can't be discredited.

He shares a case he tried that included a shooting. He said there was lots of blood....that LE didn't take dna swabs and test for gun shot residue. He shared that the jury was frustrated (or was it frushtrated???) that LE didn't take adequate samples.

People forget that KC is human. That she could easily be anyone's daughter or friend.

There are experts that live and breathe a case....then there are experts that do the bare minimum and charge for every minute on the case. You have to find a middle ground. If the expert seems too emotionally invested in the case.....they will not be perceived as an independent opinion.
You have to find that middle ground.

He knows that his every move will be more heavily scrutinized than normal. It requires he do double work. He states that he makes no move without consulting all the other attorneys working on the case before acting. ( IMO I doubt that)

He states that you are always scrutinized and analyzed by those that know less than you do. ( ummmmmmmmmm :rolling: )

Commenting on why he is was not well known...
because most of his trials were in the hispanic community. The English community didn't know a lot about him because of the language issue.

Many lawyers have been VERY gratuitous in their advice. (is that because he can't pay for consulting???)

The problems he has encountered in this case are such rare issues that even lawyers with much more experience were unable to advise.


Pearls of wisdom from JB if someone gets stopped by the popo.....
One should not feel that they are not cooperating if they do not speak to LE.
You should always have an attorney present.
If you speak without an attorney present your words can be misinterpreted and used to wrongfully convict you.

Bold mine.

Guess no one will be scrutinizing JB. :innocent: LOL

 

[Aedrys]

The job of the prosecutor is not to win the case but to ensure that truthful evidence comes forward. Is it me, or did this make no sense whatsoever? So it's only the defense's job to win?

Regarding cross examination....It's not about twisting the evidence, it's about putting it to the test. If it is true it can't be discredited. So you're supposed to do that with cross examination? I ask because he's done that WITHOUT cross examination thus far...

People forget that KC is human. That she could easily be anyone's daughter or friend. I read this statement and CHILLS ran through my body...if she passes for human to him, I hate to think what he considers a real monster to be...

He knows that his every move will be more heavily scrutinized than normal. It requires he do double work. He states that he makes no move without consulting all the other attorneys working on the case before acting. ( IMO I doubt that) Really? I think AL would shocked to hear this. It's another example of do one thing, say another *sigh*

He states that you are always scrutinized and analyzed by those that know less than you do. ( ummmmmmmmmm :rolling: ) Actually, we scrutinize you and know way MORE. Someone's a bit too big for his britches...

Many lawyers have been VERY gratuitous in their advice. (is that because he can't pay for consulting???)Yeah, because they're so embarrassed by your performanace so far, they're probably offering advice for free, no, begging you to take it. That should tell you something!

The problems he has encountered in this case are such rare issues that even lawyers with much more experience were unable to advise. I don't even have to comment on this one. I just don't have the words. I mean seriously...


Pearls of wisdom from JB if someone gets stopped by the popo.....
One should not feel that they are not cooperating if they do not speak to LE.
You should always have an attorney present.
If you speak without an attorney present your words can be misinterpreted and used to wrongfully convict you. In other words, you should hire him instead of cooperating with LE. Look where that got Casey!

Red is me. Also, respectfully snipped by me. Wow Just...I never realized he was THIS delusional...*shakes head in wonder*

 

[BondJamesBond]

I just find his use of the words "sexy and juicy" when describing the allure of this case to the media .....coupled with his comment designating KC as an attractive woman accused of a crime, a bit hard to "shwallow" (yes I spelled it that way intentionally). Why does he feel the need (consciously or subconsciously) to "sexualize" the matter at hand.

I find those comments very curious. I am no body language expert nor am I a linguist.....but as an average person (passing judgement via internet posts or blogs which he may or may not peruse for humor) I notice a distinct pattern in his verbiage and behaviors which suggests a "deep emotional investment" in this client. Thought provoking if nothing else.

IKWYM, Sleuther.

I dunno, though. Seems like, "sexy" is more commonplace now than it was just a few years ago to titillate in general. IOW...sexy = alluring or appealing. "Juicy", as in "juicy tidbit" wouldn't raise any eyebrows would it? Throw'em together and I guess its just tempting to extrapolate :saythat:

In fact, I'd say there's more innuendo in this thread than JB would get Somebody 'splain it to him... it'll make you an expert :doh:

 

[lauriej]

Quote respect... "What's juicy? What's sexy?" by JB during this interview.

On November 29, 2009 Jose was generous enough to give an interview to Blog Talk Forensics.

He was interviewed by Leslie sitting in for Larry Daniel .Here is the link to this rather informative "event".

http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/id304701292 #13 is his podcast.

Due to "technical difficulties" JB was late on the call. He later admitted his confusion on being held in queue and that he was "not all there with technology".

Studying criminology at FSU he aspired to a career in federal LE. It was a "girl" that inspired him to change his plan. His GF at the time was in law school.


I will offer more "highlights" in the next post.

..thanks for this sleuther...

..( and for the shwallow

..JB is SO full of himself, i can barely shwallow myself----------( haven't listened to all of yet, but, i love it that he has a TEAM of lawyers go over everything that he does----------judging from all of the ill prepared etc motions his TEAM has filed--------------JB'S one sad excuse for a QB.)

 

[LaLaw2000]

In my best JB voice:

"I have no further questions."

 

[The World According]

Maybe Jose can have Mr. Cabott join him next time on the podcast. LOL!!!

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVATAKaV4HQ[/ame]

 

[ZsaZsa]

It also seems to be that JB feels the heat of his critics and is just a tad insecure, don't ya think?

Yes, very!
I think the 'gratuitous advice' he mentions is from Bill Sheaffer and Richard Hornsby, among others- attorneys who have actually successfully defended clients and have a thorough understanding of the law.

 

[CA Mom]

In my best JB voice:

"I have no further questions."

LOL...that televised statement sticks with me too!

 

[The World According]

Why is he NEVER asked how is his search for Zanny going?
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyNVYEAkbps[/ame]