Nomoresorrow, I would like to say at the onset of this comment that I have the greatest respect for your posts and insight in this case. I find myself agreeing with your position virtually all of the time. However, in the part I have bolded above, I must respectfully disagree.
Sadly, I feel that the information contained in KP’s Bar Complaint defense was likely true. I see two compelling reasons to believe as such.
(1) KP was forced by the Complaint to answer allegations of a lack of diligence by not filing for child support modification and custody. She was compelled to answer truthfully as to why she had not, and could not, file these actions. She gave the reasons to the Bar, they investigated the allegations and her defense, and completely vindicated KP of any violations.
(2) KP was CS’s attorney for only 4 months (mid-March through mid July). A new attorney has represented CS for the past SIX MONTHS and has not filed for support modification or custody either.
Why do you suppose the new attorney hasn’t filed?
In all reality, yesterday’s ruling granting temporary custody to CS was still not as a result of any action filed by CS or her attorney. According to this article it was an Emergency Shelter Hearing which can ONLY be brought in Florida by the DCF.
It sounds like DCF may have actually removed Jr soon after RC’s arrest:
And
I am very glad that Crystal now has Jr no matter how it came about. However, she will still have to file for custody and have a hearing before this temporary measure becomes permanent. I hope and pray that she can and has taken whatever measures in her life are necessary to provide a stable, loving home for her son.
He deserves no less.