Juror public statements LIST ONLY

[lauriej]

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20521892,00.html

"We did our first vote and it came out half to acquit, half to convict," says the juror. "And we talked about it for a while, going through the evidence. I'd say that some people got intense, but there were no personal attacks, no real yelling. And we talked for a while, then it was 11-1 to acquit. And the guy who didn't want to acquit basically looked at us and said, 'O.K., whatever you all want.' He knew he wasn't going to convince us."

---"he" didn't need to convince "them"---if they could NOT agree-----"he" could have stuck to his guns and caused a hung jury.
..apparently he wasn't aware of this---didn't the jury foreman inform him of the way it works ???? NO???? (shocker.)

"And then we sat there for a few minutes and were like, 'Holy crap, we are letting her go free,' " he continues. "Everyone was just stunned at what we were about to do. [One of the women jurors] asked me, 'Are you okay with this?' and I said, 'Hell, no. But what else can we do? We promised to follow the law.' "

---again, they've said that the jury instructions said that they had to be unanimous--"per the law"----12 for Guilt---12 for Not Guilty
---OR---NOT 12 for either you idiots!!!!--it's called a mistrial!

Nearly two months later, would the juror change his vote? "I've learned a lot more about the case by reading the documents," he says.

---maybe this juror would have "learned a lot more" by askng to have the testimony read back....read THOSE documents while deliberating--

-----and not going over them NOW----while in the comfort of his pinellas county home........when it's way too late.

 

[okiedokietoo]

Juror Number 11
VAN SUSTEREN: You mentioned the chloroform. How did that figure into this and into your thinking?
*if there was possible more traces of it in greater amounts
*We were told, and they did, you know, as far as how -- and what chloroform is detected in other products at the levels -- you know, chloroform is detectable in other products, as well But there just was not enough, there really was not enough for us to bring chloroform into the mix.
*We know there were smaller levels of it in the trunk. We know there was a Google search on it. And that's what we had. It wasn't detected anywhere else. It wasn't on the steering wheel. It wasn't on the handle of the door, going into the car.

VAN SUSTEREN: Did you think that Cindy Anthony was telling the truth when she said that she had done those searches for chloroform?
*Well, there's a lot of speculation into that. There's a lot that went into her and looking for the chlorophyll because she was worried about her dogs.
*You know, allegedly, she was on a lot of medication. And she's been questioned a number of different times.
*But you know, as far as her going back and forth with that, you know, that was something that you always kind of kept in the back of your mind.You know, as far as her lying about it, well, there's, you know, people that may look into that and people -- but that was not something that we really considered much when we were going into deliberation.

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/on-the-record/transcript/exclusive-casey-anthony-jury-foreman-039everything-was-speculation039

 

[BD1]

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20521892,00.html

"We did our first vote and it came out half to acquit, half to convict," says the juror. "And we talked about it for a while, going through the evidence. I'd say that some people got intense, but there were no personal attacks, no real yelling. And we talked for a while, then it was 11-1 to acquit. And the guy who didn't want to acquit basically looked at us and said, 'O.K., whatever you all want.' He knew he wasn't going to convince us."

---"he" didn't need to convince "them"---if they could NOT agree-----"he" could have stuck to his guns and caused a hung jury.
..apparently he wasn't aware of this---didn't the jury foreman inform him of the way it works ???? NO???? (shocker.)

"And then we sat there for a few minutes and were like, 'Holy crap, we are letting her go free,' " he continues. "Everyone was just stunned at what we were about to do. [One of the women jurors] asked me, 'Are you okay with this?' and I said, 'Hell, no. But what else can we do? We promised to follow the law.' "

---again, they've said that the jury instructions said that they had to be unanimous--"per the law"----12 for Guilt---12 for Not Guilty
---OR---NOT 12 for either you idiots!!!!--it's called a mistrial!

Nearly two months later, would the juror change his vote? "I've learned a lot more about the case by reading the documents," he says.

---maybe this juror would have "learned a lot more" by askng to have the testimony read back....read THOSE documents while deliberating--

-----and not going over them NOW----while in the comfort of his pinellas county home........when it's way too late.

There are a number of quotes in this article that make me wonder if this jury knew what they were supposed to be doing at all.

 

[everyoneneedsavoice]

July 26, 2011

Reached by telephone Tuesday evening, alternate juror Dean Edward Eckstadt wouldn't comment.

"I'd really rather not say anything on the phone," he said. "There's a lot of headaches when we all talk to you guys."

Eckstadt said fellow jurors have said they don't want each other talking to the media.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...-jury-names-released-20110726,0,5310429.story