I'm amazed at the way that the public seems to have sealed Terri's fate. It seems cruel to me. I preface this by saying that I am not certain she is innocent...and I am not certain she is guilty. We do not have the full picture. We have absolutely no evidence to prove that Terri did anything illegal here.
Others have suggested Terri wanted to destroy her husband. I suppose they are using the landscaper's story to accuse her. While the mfh plot seems condemning, we do not have proof of the landscaper's story.
We have folks saying Terri deserves to be homeless or worse. If she has done something to Kyron then she deserves the full measure of the law to be thrown on her. But the law says we are innocent until proven guilty. I suppose I am thinking of that.
Sorry if I have offended....
I don't think you've offended anyone
And although I can see how its frustrating to feel that the public has already sealed Terri's fate and of course we are innocent until proven guilty, but I think its important to point out Law Enforcement seemed to try very hard to not condemn her. They were openly critical of public opinion in a press conference, saying that the family was trying hard to find some normalcy, and that others shouldn't criticize her for twitter/facebook whatever remarks about her "hitting the gym." They went out of their way to state that she was not a suspect. She was included in press conferences with the family. Law Enforcement stated that she had been fully cooperating. (This was before these new revelations.)
Public opinion is a loose cannon phenomenon.
When people talk about someone being innocent until proven guilty, that means that she can't be sentenced to punishment in the judicial system until a guilty verdict is rendered.
This is not true in the court of public opinion. People certainly have a right to form a premature opinion of innocence or guilt based on what they have read or have been told. I don't think many can comprehend the abduction of a child, so they try to wrap their brains around it. So they try to figure it out based on common sense, statistics, facts available. My question is this: Should people not be able to speculate or arrive at what they deem a sensible conclusion just because someone's reputation may be forever damaged if many others also arrive at the same conclusion?
I've seen so many comments talking about how what is being done to Terri is a shame, or that the media should have more responsibility. If the masses do believe she is guilty, its not the media's fault. The people have a natural curiosity, and the right to know some things at least. Law enforcement has released a small amount of information for whatever reason. The media reported it. So now the air of suspicion around Terri Horman is thicker. Law enforcement did not release information about her in order to libel her, to slander her, or to damage her reputation or social standing. Kyron's family have a right to speak their feelings in a press conference, whether or not there is damage done to Terri Horman because of it.
Of course its frightening to think that perhaps an innocent person is being railroaded. It could happen to anyone of us if we are ever in the path of an investigation. But the alternative is even more frightening to me. What if no one was ever allowed to discuss or hear any facts about an unresolved case unless they sit on a jury?
In order to ensure that no innocent person is being railroaded or portrayed negatively, the entire public would have to be prevented from knowing any and all facts of a crime and also not even be allowed to form an opinion let alone discuss it publicly. If Terri Horman has been damaged because of this, the damage only happened as a by product of a very necessary investigation, free press, and free speech.