Kathleen Savio's Death #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #201
Here's an abstract of the obit that goes a little further...

"SAVIO, KATHLEEN [Chicago Final Edition]

Chicago Tribune - Chicago, Ill.
Date: Mar 4, 2004 Section: Obituaries Text Word Count: 131
Abstract (Document Summary)
Kathleen Savio, age 40, suddenly March 1, 2004, at her residence in Bolingbrook, formerly of Glendale Heights. Survived by her loving children Thomas and Kristopher Peterson; devoted daughter of Henry (Marcia) Savio; sister of Anna Marie Savio-Doman, Susan M. Savio, Henry M...."


Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
 
  • #202
Joliet Herald, Obituaries for 3/4/2004

"Recent Deaths
Savio, Kathleen, 40
Bolingbrook,March 1
Anderson Memorial Chapel
(815) 886-2323"
 
  • #203
Tom'sGirl:

Just a couple of questions here:

You said (snip.....)

My thinking is that unless something is high priority/suspicious they don't do a thorough exam...........like x-rays for instance.

So, they don't think it is a high priority/suspicious death at this time? So no, x-rays, etc..

Sunday, Feb. 29th, not Monday, March 1st which would account for the time errors on report, they were dated wrong.

Then later you say:

The autopsy of Savio, performed by a Will County corner's forensic pathologist three weeks after her death.

Seems contradictory........if non suspicious, you do your review, get the body out of the morgue for other more SUSPICIOUS bodies, etc.

But then there is a 3 week period, until her autopsy is done??

I am confused!!!

Help!
 
  • #204
Here's an abstract of the obit that goes a little further...

"SAVIO, KATHLEEN [Chicago Final Edition]

Chicago Tribune - Chicago, Ill.
Date: Mar 4, 2004 Section: Obituaries Text Word Count: 131
Abstract (Document Summary)
Kathleen Savio, age 40, suddenly March 1, 2004, at her residence in Bolingbrook, formerly of Glendale Heights. Survived by her loving children Thomas and Kristopher Peterson; devoted daughter of Henry (Marcia) Savio; sister of Anna Marie Savio-Doman, Susan M. Savio, Henry M...."


Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Dee, wonder when she was actually buried ?, if only a few days later the media link I posted was wrong, if not...........hmmm
 
  • #205
Kathleen Savio

Kathleen Savio, age 40, suddenly March 1, 2004, at her residence in Bolingbrook, formerly of Glendale Heights. Survived by her loving children Thomas and Kristopher Peterson; devoted daughter of Henry (Marcia) Savio; sister of Anna Marie Savio-Doman, Susan M. Savio, Henry M. (Mary) Savio and Nicholas Savio; aunt of Charles H. Doman, Melissa (Tom) Moore, Michael E. Lisak, Angela M. Lisak, Elizabeth Savio, Robert Savio and Noelle Savio; niece of Mike Szpak; dear friend of Steve Maniaci; preceded in death by her Mother, Mary Savio. Visitation Friday 3 to 9 p.m. at the Anderson Memorial Chapel, 606 Townhall Dr., Romeoville. Funeral Saturday, March 6, 2003, 9:30 a.m. from the funeral home chapel to St. Andrew Catholic Church for a 10 a.m. Mass. Interment Queen of Heaven Catholic Cemetery in Hillside. 815-886-2323.
[SIZE=-1]Published in the Chicago Tribune on 3/4/2004.[/SIZE]
 
  • #206
Dee, wonder when she was actually buried ?, if only a few days later the media link I posted was wrong, if not...........hmmm

Chicago Tribune's Obituary says the funeral was held "Saturday March 6, 2003" but I believe the year is a typo, should say "Saturday March 6, 2004."
 
  • #207
Then later you say:

The autopsy of Savio, performed by a Will County corner's forensic pathologist three weeks after her death.

Seems contradictory........if non suspicious, you do your review, get the body out of the morgue for other more SUSPICIOUS bodies, etc.

But then there is a 3 week period, until her autopsy is done??

I am confused!!!

Help!

From the Obit published in the Chicago Tribune: She died 3/1, obituary 3/4, funeral 3/6.

ETA: I think the media link posted by Tom's Girl was wrong.
 
  • #208
Chicago Tribune's Obituary says the funeral was held "Saturday March 6, 2003" but I believe the year is a typo, should say "Saturday March 6, 2004."

Thanks so much dee for finding this for us, shish, no one seems to type dates or time right :doh:
 
  • #209
The time lapse could be the waiting for tox reports to complete the report.??
 
  • #210
  • #211
From the Obit published in the Chicago Tribune: She died 3/1, obituary 3/4, funeral 3/6.

ETA: I think the media link posted by Tom's Girl was wrong.

Was it ever, it really threw me when I read it!
 
  • #212
Coming out of lurk mode to say keep up the good work everyone. :clap:

I just saw on a msnbc video link that an independent person will perform the autopsy -- not the same man who did the previous one. So that's good news atleast.
 
  • #213
Hi Cakegirl! Nice to see you posting :)
 
  • #214
Should I put the info from Kathleen's obit on the "Key Players" thread??
 
  • #215
Coming out of lurk mode to say keep up the good work everyone. :clap:

I just saw on a msnbc video link that an independent person will perform the autopsy -- not the same man who did the previous one. So that's good news atleast.


Welcome to WS Cakegirl!

Jump in we welcome all opinions!
 
  • #216
The time lapse could be the waiting for tox reports to complete the report.??

oh geeze, I just thought of something. The autopsy report is signed on March 20th, 2004.

Can't anyone get their dates straight?
 
  • #217
Chicago Tribune's Obituary says the funeral was held "Saturday March 6, 2003" but I believe the year is a typo, should say "Saturday March 6, 2004."

Thank you Dee! :blowkiss:
 
  • #218
  • #219
Coming out of lurk mode to say keep up the good work everyone. :clap:

I just saw on a msnbc video link that an independent person will perform the autopsy -- not the same man who did the previous one. So that's good news atleast.

That is great news. You should post more often!
 
  • #220
SuziQ:

Going to do it in a few minutes!!!!!

Anything else should I add???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
129
Guests online
2,188
Total visitors
2,317

Forum statistics

Threads
632,507
Messages
18,627,764
Members
243,173
Latest member
neckdeepinstories
Back
Top