SeriouslySearching
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2007
- Messages
- 35,526
- Reaction score
- 272
No. Do I care?! No.Do you know which date the snake picture was taken ?
No. Do I care?! No.Do you know which date the snake picture was taken ?
Just watched the interview.. and just as I thought.. this guy wasn't tipped, and never met the A's. If he was the person speaking to DC on the phone, I don't think he would have come across as honest as he did this morning.
RK did what he should have done... followed proper protocol and called LE. LE didn't take his tip seriously, so he stopped caring. How differently all of this would have turned out if LE had taken it seriously, and searched through the swamp the best they could.
As far as getting paid a licensing fee for a pic of a snake (I didn't see it!)... more power to him. I would have done the same thing. Maybe he will donate it to a missing children's fund... he seems like the kind of guy who's disgusted at what that cash may symbolize to those who doubt him.
I don't think he's a hero, but he is the kind of guy that this case needed... he came along at the right time, followed his gut instincts, and found what no one else could.
What is the definition of a hero? A person who shows exceptional courage, nobility, etc.
I believe Mr. Kronk is showing a lot of courage to withstand the treatment he has gotten for his efforts in recovering Caylee. In my book, it is noble as well. It appears he meets the criteria and by definition is indeed a hero.
There are very few heros standing up for Caylee in this case. I know we can all name them without a list and not one of them is from her own family.
I agree but If It was me I would have walked over to the bag in front of LE and opened that bag.He could have even called the detectives in charge of Caylee case.Just thinking that Caylee could have been found so much sooner.
OK. I'm unable to look this up: In any of the updates, did Kronk say that he saw anyone going into the woods: PI's, Psychics, Anthony's, etc.?
I agree but If It was me I would have walked over to the bag in front of LE and opened that bag.He could have even called the detectives in charge of Caylee case.Just thinking that Caylee could have been found so much sooner.
This I do not agree with. A hero would have never just said I stopped caring,Not if he really felt there was a 2 yr old rotting away in a plastic bag.
What in the world is going on here? So he's been to that site in November also? Why would that small detail be left out? Did he find the body then? Could he have been the person on the phone talking to the PI trying to lead him to the body? And since the PI's didn't find it, he went back to the site in December to "just find it himself"? I am so confused about all of this but I am still not convinced that this meter reader is some stand up guy. I knew something was not right about him and now we find about this? I wonder what's going to be said on Tuesday?
I think it is ridiculous to accuse Krunk of taking a bag of remains home.![]()
I'm not sure this is totally true, redhead. Christina made some money from her Globe interview.
As for Tony and Annie - I am still holding out hope for them. Tony's roommates seemed to be very nice young men.
Salem
OK. I'm unable to look this up: In any of the updates, did Kronk say that he saw anyone going into the woods: PI's, Psychics, Anthonys, etc.?
Kronk says that on Aug 11 he and his co-worker had an hour to kill at 1:30pm. They went to Suburban Dr. because it's shady. Apparently, that is when he saw suspicious things. Was he actually at the crime scene then, or some other part of Suburban (closer to the school)?
Would the street and mowed shoulder at the crime scene have been shady at 1:30pm - or only if you actually enter the woods? Were they seeking shade with a vehicle or on foot? IOW, did they drive to shade or walk? Parked on Suburban or Hopespring?
what I got from it was that when LE came out, after that third call, neither of them saw the bag. It must have been moving around. He said the officer looked up and down and didn't see anything. You'd think RK would be saying, "it's right there, dufus!!!"
What in the world is going on here? So he's been to that site in November also? Why would that small detail be left out? Did he find the body then? Could he have been the person on the phone talking to the PI trying to lead him to the body? And since the PI's didn't find it, he went back to the site in December to "just find it himself"? I am so confused about all of this but I am still not convinced that this meter reader is some stand up guy. I knew something was not right about him and now we find about this? I wonder what's going to be said on Tuesday?
If he WAS NOT familiar with the case, he would not have found the body, IMO>
I guess there is a longer version of the GMA Kronk interview. I haven't watched it. But if the interviewer doesn't understand these kinds of nagging questions like we have... then they won't get asked of Kronk.
Mr. Kronk, on Aug 13, did you specifically direct LE to the bag that you found suspicious? Did they look inside this particular bag? Etc.
C'mon. He had to "know" something--like he was very familiar with the case and/or he saw some "authorized" people going in there.
If he WAS NOT familiar with the case, he would not have found the body, IMO>