I've found that it's a hard thing to talk about the victim's actions. I butted heads with another sleuther who disagreed with me about a victim before.
To answer your question, if we supposed that she had a sexual relationship with him, then that certainly changes the motive for the murder. Instead of him killing her after molesting her, we might then have to think that perhaps she threatened to expose the relationship if she didn't get what she wanted from him--whatever that could be in the world of speculation. So he sodomized her out of anger and killed her to keep her quiet. I don't know...
Whether she had sex with him willingly (or at least what she thought was willingly) at any point, we have to admit SOMETHING was going on between them for her to have his number, for her to think that she could text him for "rides" and for her to willingly lie to her mother that she was going somewhere with the 19 year-old when she was really going somewhere with AL.
I have to assume she was lying about the 19 year old, because he had not come up at all in this case. There's no reason to hide his identity because he's over 18. If she'd actually had correspondence with the 19 year old that night, I'm certain the police would have added him to the suspect list--especially after the things Longoria said in that KSN interview and in that KWCH interview.
What i'd like to know is how often since the girlfriend's birthday party did Alicia go out late at night and say she was with someone else and a black SUV picked her up. I'd like to know if her behavior changed at home after the night of that birthday party. Some of her friends or this 19 year old or somebody has got to know whether she had a relationship with this man.
Also, I made the assumption that TC didn't know about the texts until the monday after the disappearance. I gleaned that the mother learned that the party had been at AL house. she went over there to confront him, and THAT is how she learned that Alicia was texting AL. I assumed from that KWCH interview that the mother did not know all along that AD was texting this man. I figured that it was the girlfriend who knew all along, because in the interview, AL said that the mother said "I didn't have to worry about her texting me anymore." And for some reason, I seriously, seriously doubt that TC had EVER had a conversation with AL before that Monday.
What are y'all's thoughts on that?
First of all it is illegal to have a sexual relationship with a 14 year old in Kansas, and so she could not "consent" to a sexual relationship, so she would have been being molested, in other words, a victim of a crime.
Second, when he says he was told to text her that night and invite her to a party at his house, but didn't know "it" and tell her who all was going to be there, he was setting her up, ie, premeditation. imo.
Whether he has done this before, it appears to me that he enjoys manipulation, not just the kill, and that imo he has done this before.
He knows who the vulnerable ones are.
Personally I think he was grooming her.
For some reason he doesn't think the AG was allowed to bring up his past criminal history, so he was angry that he wasn't "playing fair" and that his rights were being violated, apparently again. If looks could kill, eh?
He was intentionally attempting to intimidate the AG, but it was clear that he was the one who felt intimated.
Imo, that was what the interview was about too, manipulation.
She hadn't even started high school yet.
What a horrible crime.
RIP baby girl.
Wonder if he'll be needing the pr of jeans he mailed? Doubt the cowboy hats will come into play, don't you? If he comes to court in a suit and tie, I'm going to faint from laughter. Seems he would feel most comfortable in state provided clothing as he's spent most of his life in them. ?
