I believe he means they suspect no foul play was involved. The investigation is ongoing and their opinion is subject to change the more evidence they gather.
A spokesman for police in Kansas City, Kansas, says the death of a boy killed while riding a waterslide at a local water park is considered a criminal investigation because a death was involved. Officer Cameron Morgan said investigators didn't believe anything criminal happened, so it would be a "civil matter."
On Tuesday, he clarified that the investigation is a criminal case because a death was involved, as is standard procedure. He reaffirmed police don't believe any criminal wrongdoing occurred and are investigating to rule out that any crime was committed.
He is saying at this time he doesn't 'believe' any criminal wrongdoing occurred. That is just an opinion and not an affirmation.
http://www.ky3.com/content/news/Pol...tterbahn-in-Kansas-City-Kansas-389622462.html
I do believe they will change their opinion and find out that indeed it is a criminal matter especially if it is true about the straps just being there for show and were prone to snap. It will depend how far back others complained of the straps not holding them in and how long the owner had known about this problem and did nothing to rectify it to ensure the safety of everyone.
I think at least they will be charged with criminal negligence but then that doesn't seem to fit if they were fully aware of the problem and did absolutely nothing about it. That is more like a wonton disregard for human life to me. They weren't negligent, imo, meaning they just overlooked the problem but if they knew about it all along they were complicit knowing it was a serious safety hazard and did nothing to correct it.
I do believe they will also be civilly sued as well and not only by the family but by those who were there and are going to be traumatized for life by seeing what happened to this little boy. That is something so horrific that can scar people for life, mentally, who cant ever get the image out of their head.
IMO
Wow, this is awful, I hope this place isn't still open or doesn't open again. Just terrible for this family and whoa that poor brother..So sad![]()
KCK police have already announced this is a civil matter, no criminal investigation is being done and there will be no police report on the incident.
Editing to add they announced that less than 24 hours after the incident.
Schlitterbahn money apparently works fast in Wyandotte County.
Aren't most cases like this civil? What would the criminal charges be?
IDK
It certainly could turn into a manslaughter charge and even a voluntary manslaughter if they find the owner of the ride had a total disregard for safety of human life by not making sure the straps holding the people in were secure. If they have known about this for sometime they certainly could be looking at a criminal charge.
IMO
Wow, this is awful, I hope this place isn't still open or doesn't open again. Just terrible for this family and whoa that poor brother..So sad![]()
Wow, this is awful, I hope this place isn't still open or doesn't open again. Just terrible for this family and whoa that poor brother..So sad![]()
BBM---
It makes complete sense that a more traditional type harness would not allow a rider to get free if the raft flipped over.... But I'm not sure if the greatest risk on this particular water ride is drowning. Seems like the biggest risk here is passengers flying out of their seats, as evidenced by early video. Does not appear the major modifications and the addition of the netting. which delayed the opening of the slide, were very effective.
Again, I say ego and profit clouded a lot of judgement in the design and ultimate approval of the world's tallest water slide.
JMO
KCK police have already announced this is a civil matter, no criminal investigation is being done and there will be no police report on the incident.
Editing to add they announced that less than 24 hours after the incident.
Schlitterbahn money apparently works fast in Wyandotte County.
Aren't most cases like this civil? What would the criminal charges be?
IDK
Stewart Parnell must have had the same line of thinking when he covered up the salmonella peanut butter contamination issue in his company. He'll be serving 28 years in prison now though. http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/21/us/salmonella-peanut-exec-sentenced/
After looking at all the pictures and watching all the videos, how in the world can anyone assume that the netting being supported by those bars add any measure of safety?? Wouldn't common sense tell you that those bars would cause injury if the rider came out of the raft or if the raft came off the chute? I am completely baffled by how obviously dangerous this ride is . . .