I just wanted to comment on something regarding ReH. If she indeed lured Pat out of the house, she should be charged right along with the other two.
However there is a chance that she may not have known about it until after the fact. I'm sure ReH put two and two together and figured out the her husband had something to do with this. I'm sure she knew that her husband owned that hat and money clip. She started questioning him about it, etc. If this is the case, she should get a deal.
I do want to see whoever did this horrible thing in jail forever even if it takes setting ReH free unless of course she actually took part in the kidnapping.
She should have came forward with the info. that he owned those things right when it first happened. BUT if that same thing happened to you, would you turn your own husband in without know absolutely for sure that he did it? Just on the fact that he owned those two things? Well, she also had the fact that not only did her husband own those two things but that he was also associated with EK. That would pretty much tell you that he did it.
I just don't know what I'd do. Especially if I was controlled and beat down. I don't know if she was controlled and beat down but gossip says she was.
Things are happening pretty fast now. There won't be much more of a wait.
I'm grateful that the Kimmi kids won't be wondering forever what happened to their mom. Nothing would be worse than that. I'm just sad that it will be a bittersweet ending.
Mima, your posts are always so well thought out and stated. Bravo!
ITA with what you said above concerning ReH.
In my mind (scenario of what may have happened), I see RoH being either alone that night or with EK waiting in the truck. We know there was a scuffle on the porch. Did he knock than attack? When I read the snip below I gather that they both were subpoenaed to the inquisition the Thursday before the accident and I see RoH angry... perhaps for her giving something away...like if she knew where he was when Pat was attacked..
Hill says
Hollister was present with his wife, Rebecca Hollister, in Atchison County the day before the accident and become upset with his wife for speaking to law enforcement about his involvement in the Kimmi matter that day. http://www.knzafm.com/stories/01587...RDER-OF-WIFE-PROVIDES-MORE-DETAILS_113734.php
(the following is just thoughts)...
if a beat down, abused, timid woman is 'coerced' into hurting Pat than these attributes would most likely extend to her testimony.. meaning she would lie under oath or be RoH's alibi. But no, RoH is on-the-handle angry with her for what she testified to.
and another snip:
He says on the day of the accident, Roger Hollister was driving to Topeka with his wife and became upset at her for asking him why he had become so involved in the Kimmi matter. Hill says Roger Hollister then asked Rebecca Hollister what he wanted her to do about it now and then stated lets just end it now
So to paraphrase the above, ReH asks RoH why he has become so involved in Pat's case (is she probing him to tell her more?)
RoH than asks ReH what should he do about (being so involved in Pat's case) now?
RoH further tells her, "let's end it (his involvement) now".
And she is seen shaking her head no as RoH swerves his car into a semi truck with an evil look on his face.
What is most interesting to me is the obvious fact that ReH and the truck driver have both been questioned since the accident. So in this article we are basically getting to see ReH speak for the first time.
I see her being a person who can put holes in RoH's alibi... but I don't, at this time, see her being more involved. But only time will tell. And if she had anything to do with it in the first or second degree she needs to pay.
((sorry for the long post))
