- Joined
- Aug 22, 2009
- Messages
- 7,363
- Reaction score
- 28,278
MOD NOTE
To be certain everyone knows that the info you are discussing in your post can be linked back to an MSM article that contains the facts you are referencing, it is a good idea to include the link in all subsequent posts. You can also quote the post that contains the link. Many members come into a fast moving thread without the luxury of time to read all prior posts that contain links, and thus do not know if what you are referencing was indeed substantiated by a MSM article or LE statement. They can then ask for the link or report the post.
At some point after much discussion some info becomes understood as fact in a case and readers generally know what info has been repeatedly substantiated and thus accepted without a link. It is not exactly a hard and fast rule because it depends on a number of issues - the amount of traffic on a thread, the prevalence of info in MSM, the history of the case etc. Again, to be certain your opinions and comments are understood, it is safest to provide links to the MSM substantiation OR be prepared to do so when requested.
ALSO, ALL members are encouraged to read the most recent articles listed in the MEDIA thread for the case. That way everyone is current on the latest info substantiated by MSM and LE. Reminder that the Media thread is NOT for discussion, but only for posting links to MSM publications about the case.
Hope that helps a bit.
CocoChanel
Moderator
To be certain everyone knows that the info you are discussing in your post can be linked back to an MSM article that contains the facts you are referencing, it is a good idea to include the link in all subsequent posts. You can also quote the post that contains the link. Many members come into a fast moving thread without the luxury of time to read all prior posts that contain links, and thus do not know if what you are referencing was indeed substantiated by a MSM article or LE statement. They can then ask for the link or report the post.
At some point after much discussion some info becomes understood as fact in a case and readers generally know what info has been repeatedly substantiated and thus accepted without a link. It is not exactly a hard and fast rule because it depends on a number of issues - the amount of traffic on a thread, the prevalence of info in MSM, the history of the case etc. Again, to be certain your opinions and comments are understood, it is safest to provide links to the MSM substantiation OR be prepared to do so when requested.
ALSO, ALL members are encouraged to read the most recent articles listed in the MEDIA thread for the case. That way everyone is current on the latest info substantiated by MSM and LE. Reminder that the Media thread is NOT for discussion, but only for posting links to MSM publications about the case.
Hope that helps a bit.
CocoChanel
Moderator