So he leans out a window and shoots at them. Then doesn't shoot any more as he realises it is LE. If what you say is right then why did the GJ disagree and believe it was self defence by Mattingly and Cosgrove? When he called 911 he knew it was LE because he stated in his interview that was why he did not shoot any more and kicked his gun under a bed.
ETA have you a link to the Kentucky statute please? Otherwise it cannot be quoted as a fact.
There has not been a "no true bill" released. We don't know what the grand jury heard or didn't hear. This is exactly why it is important to see/hear/read the grand jury testimony.
See above, the question in the post:
If what you say is right then why did the GJ disagree and believe it was self defence by Mattingly and Cosgrove?
Last edited: