I don't think he did it. After catching up today with the trial and with the evidence, this kid will be acquitted. There is no evidence against him other than the word of the cousin, whose story is highly suspect to me.
It sounds like the story she was told to tell police when Gouker initially wanted to pin the whole thing on him. Because why, if he committed it with his father, would he then run next door to the cousin's house, implicate himself and expose the crime. Wouldn't he just expose of the weapons quietly with his father? Why did he need to be driven anywhere? It is just something to give Cassie knowledge of the case. The only way she could know anything is if she wasn't there. She initially said that JG did it. She's covering for him, but since JG recanted and took responsibility for the whole thing, she has to stick to her story.
The murder was not even committed with a baseball bat. Her story is BS.
Maybe Josh Young was there, but as of right now there is not one scratch of evidence that he was. When Trey tried to leave the house that night, he was alone, he was not with Josh.
It sounds like the story she was told to tell police when Gouker initially wanted to pin the whole thing on him. Because why, if he committed it with his father, would he then run next door to the cousin's house, implicate himself and expose the crime. Wouldn't he just expose of the weapons quietly with his father? Why did he need to be driven anywhere? It is just something to give Cassie knowledge of the case. The only way she could know anything is if she wasn't there. She initially said that JG did it. She's covering for him, but since JG recanted and took responsibility for the whole thing, she has to stick to her story.
The murder was not even committed with a baseball bat. Her story is BS.
Maybe Josh Young was there, but as of right now there is not one scratch of evidence that he was. When Trey tried to leave the house that night, he was alone, he was not with Josh.