- Joined
- Jan 6, 2020
- Messages
- 3,374
- Reaction score
- 54,127
Delphi was truly an unfortunate error likely due to the sheer volume of information that was coming in and the inadequacy of staff to manage it in the beginning. Delphi, Indiana is a very small town where crimes like what happened to Abby & Libby - opportunistic abduction and murder of victims likely unknown to the perpetrator - rarely occur.Hopefully they can make a chart, untangle lies and move forward.
Richard Allen the Delphi murderer was convicted after a retired detective from CPS was doing volunteer "housekeeping" on the case, reviewing initial case interviews and she found that the Carroll County Sheriff's office had misfiled RAs initial interview and marked "cleared" in error.
That initial interview contained the information to fix his time and location the trail, and thus be able to prove he was the man on the bridge, beyond a reasonable doubt.
MOO Same here -
I would like to add the Georgia Bureau of Investigation did a "thorough" peer "top to bottom" case review in Delphi and did not find this discrepancy -
Apparently it took a retired "girl" detective to dig in and look at every single thing.
I suggest they hire her to come look at this case. (Kathy Shank)
But investigators SHOULD most certainly treat very carefully information that comes in early. In the Delphi case, Allen "self-reported" his presence near where Abby & Libby were killed, likely because he feared that he may have been seen walking the trails that day and/or his wife might recognize him from the photo (taken from Libby's cellphone) of the perpetrator approaching Abby and Libby that LE released very early in the case. Given that perpetrators will be concerned about whether they have been detected and are under suspicion, such "self-reports" should receive scrutiny by more than one person, and certainly by a person who possesses the kind of skepticism necessary to investigative work.
Ticking items off a list to put them in the "done" box is not skeptical enough.