Dogface
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2009
- Messages
- 2,734
- Reaction score
- 453
witness accounts contradict this. but this is the south im sure what he says goes.
I'm sure gun powder testing of the car will be able to confirm or dismiss this.
witness accounts contradict this. but this is the south im sure what he says goes.
Jail records show 54-year-old Ronald Gasser was arrested late Monday.
Man who shot ex-NFL player arrested for manslaughter
http://www.kake.com/story/33941036/man-who-shot-ex-nfl-player-arrested-for-manslaughter
wth? has that sheriff lost his mind? im only 15 minutes into the PC but if i were a member of joe mcknight's family right now i would be highly disappointed in the way this sheriff has chosen to conduct this PC so far.
too many things to list, you have to see it.
I'm assuming, as he is the person holding the press conference he can use it to address whatever he seems fit.
the press conference wasnt held to discuss what some morons have said on social media, it was to discuss the decision to charge gasser with manslaughter.
the sheriff went on a nearly 20 minute rant about everything but the decision to file charges, he actually opened it up for questions before he ever addressed the actual case.
he never once stated what the critical factor/s were that brought them to believe this case was not covered by the stand your ground law.
none of this has anything to do with whether or not i agree with his initial comments or believe them to be accurate.
Blech! :blah: You are right. I thought he started out okay with the tough talk, defending the decision his dept. made, but he really lost me when he went into the profanity-filled rant. I understand him explaining the need to seek out and interview witnesses and analyze evidence. That makes perfect sense. But, he should have stopped there and opened the floor for questions. MOOthe press conference wasnt held to discuss what some morons have said on social media, it was to discuss the decision to charge gasser with manslaughter.
the sheriff went on a nearly 20 minute rant about everything but the decision to file charges, he actually opened it up for questions before he ever addressed the actual case.
he never once stated what the critical factor/s were that brought them to believe this case was not covered by the stand your ground law.
none of this has anything to do with whether or not i agree with his initial comments or believe them to be accurate.
To some extent, I agree. Normand addressed some things he needed to address at the beginning (evidence, witnesses), but ended up responding to hateful language with hateful language. He showed no emotional intelligence. It's understandable to defend one's reasoning and actions firmly, but a profanity-laced vitriol against one's detractors is unnecessary and simply childish. It did not put Normand in a good light.Personally I am glad he is taking to task all the hateful language used by people, directed at them, while, as it seems, they were conducting a thorough investigation based on evidence, not emotion. I swear, society is drifting towards having no emotional intelligence whatsoever.