----------But wouldn't there have been blood, skin, hair, etc. evidence there, as well as fragments of her bicycle? I imagine that the pavement would have been scraped as well?
The only way that it could be her would be if she had been stopped, fallen over immediately after this picture was taken of her, the truck came along and ran over her.
Both her and the truck are in the same locations when the picture's were taken. If that truck hit her and she ended up under it, the picture of her under the truck would have been in the middle of the intersection.
Not to mention the people pumping gas that close would surly of heard something, seen something, especially the truck backing off her and loading her and the bike into the truck.
Impossible for us to know. There are so many white trucks of that make and model in Louisiana.
Solving this crime will not be anything like a C.S.I. episode, of course. But I was thinking that one aspect seems inprobable enough to be in modern day crime drama...The perp(s) who seem to be stumping le.
My fear is that this is CSI vs Andy Griffith.
MOO
but if you take a close look under the road work sign, IMO there's Mickey, clear of the bike and the truck, but in serious trouble.
![]()
![]()
and if we zoom out a bit to re-orient ourselves..
![]()
some think the gear of REVERSE is what is shown in DWTiq
http://www.katc.com/videos/nancy-shunick-speaks/ There's a new interview on KATC this morning with Mickey's mom. She said "We haven't been told anything. It's not like C.S.I. I don't think 6 people stand around and the machine 'dings' and it tells you it's John Smith from Anytown,"
----------but if you take a close look under the road work sign, IMO there's Mickey, clear of the bike and the truck, but in serious trouble.![]()
![]()
and if we zoom out a bit to re-orient ourselves..
![]()
some think the gear of REVERSE is what is shown in DWTiq
Here's a side-by-side of Mickey and the DWT. Is it possible that the light near Mickey's tire isn't actually a reflector from the pedal (that's what I had assumed it was)? It's almost in the same spot as the light under the DWT. (Not in any way saying that's her under there!)
![]()
This image shows a side-by-side of the trees. There are definitely lights in the image with the truck, but I don't think there's enough clarity to determine if that's a car and especially not enough to tell if it's the hoopity.
![]()
-----
Calling A.C.I. -- I thought A.C.I. asked LE and they said there was video of her beyond the point of where she was shown by Circle K.
Perhaps some of you can recall that?
they didn't say what her ride was, if they did see her. on foot,bike, in a car, truck..in a subsequent video
frankly I think they gave us the slip on the grips "found at the scene".. I heard one account of the grips being submerged with the bike, but I didn't hear the cop at press conference by the bay say that. At "the scene" could also mean 'scene of the crime' IMO. The bike's handle bars are so sawed off and narrow, a big stilted truck like that could clear many objects that lower vehicles could not.
Reverse gear might indicate the bike got wedged under the truck. The handlebars are the most likely point of contact, on the right side making contact with the hot hot oil pan and exhaust area, and on th left, getting scraped along the asphalt.
I'll repeat that pressure washers and truck parts were discovered missing from the scene of an arson fire that morning. Pressure washers do what is implied, and they run on gas, no electricity needed. If one returned with a hard hat, some orange safety garb, and some pressure washers, one is considered a road worker, not a person of interest... street gleaming with spic and span-ness.
I'll repeat that pressure washers and truck parts were discovered missing from the scene of an arson fire that morning. Pressure washers do what is implied, and they run on gas, no electricity needed. If one returned with a hard hat, some orange safety garb, and some pressure washers, one is considered a road worker, not a person of interest... street gleaming with spic and span-ness.
but if you take a close look under the road work sign, IMO there's Mickey, clear of the bike and the truck, but in serious trouble.
![]()
![]()
and if we zoom out a bit to re-orient ourselves..
![]()
some think the gear of REVERSE is what is shown in DWTiq
----------
BBM, above, in sequence.
1. So, how did she get clear of the bike and truck IYO without leaving blood or tissue evidence on the road? I've proposed one of my theories. I want to hear yours.
2. Gear of Reverse. Why do they think that? Are you confirming what I said about the truck backing up after perhaps grabbing her, or are you saying it was some other reason?
Not being hostile, just critical thinking.
IMO, if LE really wanted help finding the DWTIQ they would release some streaming video. It's almost laughable that LE would tell the general public to be on the lookout for a white Chevy Z71...there is one on every corner! I have got to imagine that LE has figured out who owns the white truck but releasing that they know may not be in the best interest of the investigation. On the flip side, LE has not recently stated that they are still looking for the truck, have they? It's been a while since we have heard that.
And also...what the heck is the deal with no front license plates needed in LA??? Where I live plates are required on the front and the back of a vehicle, IMO front plates sure would have helped to ID the vehicle in question here and likely assist in helping ID vehicles in many other crimes...it is often a person (or camera) catching a plate # that helps, I am baffled by any states not requiring front and back plates! (Just my opinion).
----------IMO, if LE really wanted help finding the DWTIQ they would release some streaming video. It's almost laughable that LE would tell the general public to be on the lookout for a white Chevy Z71...there is one on every corner! I have got to imagine that LE has figured out who owns the white truck but releasing that they know may not be in the best interest of the investigation. On the flip side, LE has not recently stated that they are still looking for the truck, have they? It's been a while since we have heard that.
And also...what the heck is the deal with no front license plates needed in LA??? Where I live plates are required on the front and the back of a vehicle, IMO front plates sure would have helped to ID the vehicle in question here and likely assist in helping ID vehicles in many other crimes...it is often a person (or camera) catching a plate # that helps, I am baffled by any states not requiring front and back plates! (Just my opinion).