Someone here mentioned earlier about NOLA. I think I'd be willing to add that as a possible scenario, based on info someone here referenced as having been seen on MS's FB page early on in the case.
Can you elaborate? or provide a link?
Someone here mentioned earlier about NOLA. I think I'd be willing to add that as a possible scenario, based on info someone here referenced as having been seen on MS's FB page early on in the case.
Can you elaborate? or provide a link?
If the perp wanted to make a statement or use the dumping of the bike as a ruse, wouldn't he/she have made the bike's distinguishing features more obvious?
Someone here mentioned earlier about NOLA. I think I'd be willing to add that as a possible scenario, based on info someone here referenced as having been seen on MS's FB page early on in the case.
Can you elaborate? or provide a link?
Someone obviously dumped the bike.. Assuming it was the perp and Mickey is still alive, maybe he has her in a room of some type (storage facility, shed, basement) and it is his only hiding space...maybe he leaves her there for periods of time and doesn't want her to have anything she could use as a weapon or means of escape...All obviously speculation on my part.He couldn't store a bike, yet has a place to keep Mickey hidden?
Maybe he has her in a room of some type (storage facility, shed, basement) and it is his only hiding space...maybe he leaves her there for periods of time and doesn't want her to have anything she could use as a weapon or means of escape...All obviously speculation on my part.
I am trying to think of an analogy...something along the lines of someone steals an armored car and keeps the money but ditches the armored car. A wildly ridiculous analogy I know, but I just don't see why he would want to hold onto the bike...
I wish I could be much more specific, but there's something that's been troubling me and staying at the back of my mind throughout this search for clues to Mickey's disappearance.
I know of a Lafayette policeman who went out of his way to pursue a young blonde female friend of mine. She never pressed charges of any kind, but she moved out of town soon after. I use the word "stalk" because he drove up behind her at a gas station and basically began flirting with her. She asked if she'd done anything wrong and he said no, but he wanted to know her name and where she lived. She got home to the house she was sharing with a female friend, and the policeman showed up at her door later in the day!
He was roughly 35 years old, 6 ft tall, stocky, with dark hair and tanned complexion and she remembers his legs were kinda bowed. She was polite to him, but made it clear that she had a boyfriend. He still showed up again at her home to pursue her and she had to make it clear she was not interested in him. Every time she saw a cop car behind her in town she felt uncomfortable thinking it might be him.
I am in no way accusing this member of LE as having anything to do with Mickey's disappearance, just sharing this reminder that policeman are human and sometimes mix work with pleasure. Also, the fact that the girl in question was in her early 20's, blonde and pretty, and this all took place in Lafayette, is worth mentioning on this thread. I've also wondered if he was thrown out of the police force since that time, and for all we know, could be the cop impersonator who's been mentioned in recent stories.:what:
I believe it would be thrown away b/c to her it is a means of escape.
The other girl in Jacksonville, the bike was not found, she was.
In Mickey's instance, It would be used as a I have you and you have no means of escape, a control mechanism of sorts.
This has nagged at me since early on for various reasons. I too wish I could be more specific but I obviously will not slueth by name to protect WS. Although, The facts of which are readily available through MSM if you google. especially Dec 2011, The Advocate. It's a serious consideration and very hard to investigate properly for obvious reasons. I certainly do hope that the private investigator seriously looks into it.
He couldn't store a bike, yet has a place to keep Mickey hidden?
the case in jacksonville happened friday june 1st ...that was after mickey went missing..so if he is keeping mickey alive..it wouldn't be the same perp
Yes. He had a place planned for a girl. But nothing else. He probably didn't count on seeing her ride her bike that night. But when he did he went into action. He had no interest in keeping anything but the girl. Didn't want to take a chance someone seeing something on the property later on, and then seeing a news report that person remembers seeing it there. Not even the meter man coming by to read a meter. Get rid of it soon as possible.
Of course I am speculating under the theory she was abducted. Which from watching and hearing from the mother on here that a abduction is what happened.
I know we have hashed and rehashed the "what ifs" about the possibility of the bike being dumped from the bridge at WB. Even if the person was familiar with the area.... how dark would it be a night to dump over the bridge and hit the water, or the correct area? (was the moon out that night???)
I am imagining it pitch black under the bridge - and would be hard to know exactly where to pitch the bike to make sure it hit in the water where the person intended it to land. With the car/truck's lights on, it would make it seem even darker and harder to see down below the bridge, wouldn't it?
Locals that have been there??? Is the darkness and hitting the "target" off the bridge in the dark an issue?
TIA
I know we have hashed and rehashed the "what ifs" about the possibility of the bike being dumped from the bridge at WB. Even if the person was familiar with the area.... how dark would it be a night to dump over the bridge and hit the water, or the correct area? (was the moon out that night???)
I am imagining it pitch black under the bridge - and would be hard to know exactly where to pitch the bike to make sure it hit in the water where the person intended it to land. With the car/truck's lights on, it would make it seem even darker and harder to see down below the bridge, wouldn't it?
Locals that have been there??? Is the darkness and hitting the "target" off the bridge in the dark an issue?
TIA
I do understand your perspective, but since Mickey hasn't been found yet, as unrealistic as it may be odds-wise, I prefer to go on the assumption that she is still alive.I absolutely agree that she was abducted...but not to "keep".