LA - Mickey Shunick, 21, Lafayette 19 May 2012 - #31

[waiting1979]

In one of those pictures I see some sort of ghost and in another part of a boat.


Just thought I would chime in!

oh no, it's contagious..

 

[justwannahelp]

IMO looks like bike in first pic and truck balls in second......objects don't move themselves a lane over...may be same truck in both unless I missed something. Truck balls may be in first pic and not visible.......Imo bike is under tire in first pic and either dragged out of view are more likely removed before truck came back.

And again ......about my.theory.which I believe more and more still...a lot of questions were asked about elapsed time andbif elapsed time between pics was long enough to abduct her......according to my theory......the truck ran over a bike right after he turned the corner....he didn't know what he hit or what happened and went back to see but it wasn't there when he passed back in the pic that we see what I think is truck balls...or cow bell....whatever.....could it be some sort of hitch like the kind I have bashed my shins on all my life? LOL....

So my opinion only but I still believe even more and more firmly someone got her attention and she was stopping as they approached her (foot on ground) asked for help with something nicely.....phone cash cigarette etc......and then took off with something she thought she should chase them down for...(most likely phone because if nit shed just call someone) I think she dropped her bike there and ran after them....and either they lured her away like that to do her harm or she chased after them so they harmed her........it is the only thing I can think of to account fo
Picture being cropped
Looks like bike undervtruck
No screams
Nothing left behind......no blood no belongings
Sudden decrease in desire for outside help

good theory that they ran over the bike, but not her. i hadn't thought about that.

but how does this explain the sudden decrease in desire for outside help?
i'm not being snarky. just trying to process your theory.

 

[cluciano63]

true true true. you see, I'm just getting so desperate for something besides a white truck. and i desperately want to understand why they won't do the radioshow

They probably do not have any reason to trust WS; we know it is strongly moderated and well-run and respected, etc...all they really know about the radio show comes from the fact that a PI they did not hire was on the show talking about the case and they probably heard that from mostly rumors and gossip, etc...

JMO

 

[cluciano63]

Do I have to be a member of Facebook to read about the searches the sister has been talking about?

I am not sure? I just look at Charlie's personal page and she has photos posted over the past several days, some of which are at the search facility. I will see if they are on the public Mickie page...

ETA: There is a post on Charlie's page from Monday where it says that volunteer searches have picked back up again...FWIW

 

[justwannahelp]

oh my y'all. LE has GOT to release SOMETHING more for us to work with. we are down to ghosts, aliens, and TRUCK BALLS.

:crosseyed::crosseyed::crosseyed:

 

[:+:MrTT:+:]

I am not sure? I just look at Charlie's personal page and she has photos posted over the past several days, some of which are at the search facility. I will see if they are on the public Mickie page...

ETA: There is a post on Charlie's page from Monday where it says that volunteer searches have picked back up again...FWIW

Can you link the Charlie page?
I wanna know if they will be checking any of the exits off I10
going east after the bridge.
​

 

[waiting1979]

Originally Posted by waiting1979
this object can move.. also, a bump in the road cannot move. if it's 'just a bump', it needs to pick a lane. LE's description of the bike damage is not consistent with a multiple drive over kind of event.. but mostly it's their silence yelling at me.

the bump goes across the whole road. i wish someone could find chickenfried's pic. it's like the whole road is higher all the way across where the front wheels are. like a ramp. a ramp is the best way to describe it.

i agree that it REALLLLLY looks like her bike light under that truck, but the physics of it keep me from being convinced. i never thought about the truck going in reverse, but someone at the Circle K would have noticed thaaat, right?

The CF pic really helped me with orientation. I was surprised to see the road work looking so half finished. If memory serves it was blacktop, with some white asphault underneath. At that time I backwards about Mickey's direction of travel and whether she was through the intersection. We'll dig up the photo by tonight.
I'm expecting a drop tho, not a rise.
Also, the lights at the Circle K look blinding. I doubt you could see much beyond the islands.

 

[NewYork625]

Do I have to be a member of Facebook to read about the searches the sister has been talking about?

You don't need to be a member. You can go here: https://www.facebook.com/findmickeynow and http://www.facebook.com/findmickeynow#!/charlene.shunick

 

[gngr~snap]

I was wondering about "the brake lights" in the photo...
IF the driver is OUT of the truck,could he have turned
his "flashers" on before exiting the vehicle? ~ I am not familiar
with "trucks" and I have no idea how the flashes would appear.

 

[justwannahelp]

there is a FB page called New Orleans' Effort to Bring Mickey Home
There is an apologetic comment by Charlene on there about the whole Jordan situation

 

[Deleted member 39678]

They probably do not have any reason to trust WS; we know it is strongly moderated and well-run and respected, etc...all they really know about the radio show comes from the fact that a PI they did not hire was on the show talking about the case and they probably heard that from mostly rumors and gossip, etc...

JMO

BBM
It may be true that they have no reason to trust WS, but they did use the word "foolish" when they declined the offer of going on the WS radio show.

I'm not sure why using this type of media to get information out about Mickey would be "foolish".
It's not that hard to decline to say anything that may harm the search while being interviewed. JMO.

 

[justwannahelp]

BBM
It may be true that they have no reason to trust WS, but they did use the word "foolish" when they declined the offer of going on the WS radio show.

I'm not sure why using this type of media to get information out about Mickey would be "foolish".
It's not that hard to decline to say anything that may harm the search while being interviewed. JMO.

Yes. I get the impression that the mother doesn't like us and thinks we are foolish. Quite frankly, I feel foolish wasting all of my time trying to figure this out - especially when they aren't helping us to figure it out in ANY way shape or form.

 

[cluciano63]

Honestly I don't think the family knows any more than the public does, or very little more. And what they may know, they probably cannot share. I can't pick apart the words they use.

 

[JurysOut]

OK. If she's not under the truck & she's not being held for ransom and she wasn't abducted by aliens, where the hell is she?

If we have absolutely, positively nothing after that intersection, where'd she go?

That's what we have. Mickey across from the Circle K --> no Mickey. Poof!

Whatever happened either happened in front of our eyes or just out of frame. Because there is zero evidence of her presence any farther in any direction. None.

And if nobody anywhere has any idea WHAT could have possibly happened out of frame - after all this time - it seems to me that in front of our eyes at the very least deserves continued consideration.

Dogs haven't found her, cameras didn't see her, people have searched. Hundreds of people for hundreds of hours.

If you want to dismiss the under the wheel theory, offer something equally plausible. Why is there nothing after that intersection? Nothing? But that's when and where something happened? Where there's nothing? There's never been anything? Not a sound, not an image, not a witness, no dog picked up her scent further along, but she definitely kept going? And you're completely convinced? By what? Why are you convinced she continued after the last known image? It seems to me that THAT's a bigger leap of faith than under the wheel.

I'm not there. I can't get there. I can't physically touch that street, sniff the air.

I see the right front wheel of that truck in a position indicating that something's under it. Unless there's a photo of a 5 or 6" bump in the road, only on that side, I'm going with it's rolling over something. Something as substantial as a speed bump.

No one's even attempted to show that the right front wheel was flat on the pavement because it can't be shown. It's not flat on the pavement. There is no speed bump there. 30 threads later, there's no reasonable explanation for why the truck's front end is askew. Why not?

Show me a picture of the bump in that exact location that would cause a vehicle that size to so obviously be off kilter and I'll let it go. Really I will. Sincerely.

I don't think it's been solidly demonstrated to be impossible. 'Because I don't think so' doesn't work for me.

I've been scoffed at, schooled in personal versions of possible physics and I put it all away for a while. Went away, did other stuff.

But it's still there. The image is still there. It broke my heart the first time I saw it. I wept for an hour.

I'd love to be wrong. I want very badly for it to be nothing. I hate having that picture in my head.



Show me the 6" bump, give me some peace. Please.

 

[NewYork625]

OK. If she's not under the truck & she's not being held for ransom and she wasn't abducted by aliens, where the hell is she?

If we have absolutely, positively nothing after that intersection, where'd she go?

That's what we have. Mickey across from the Circle K --> no Mickey. Poof!

Whatever happened either happened in front of our eyes or just out of frame. Because there is zero evidence of her presence any farther in any direction. None.

And if nobody anywhere has any idea WHAT could have possibly happened out of frame - after all this time - it seems to me that in front of our eyes at the very least deserves continued consideration.

Dogs haven't found her, cameras didn't see her, people have searched. Hundreds of people for hundreds of hours.

If you want to dismiss the under the wheel theory, offer something equally plausible. Why is there nothing after that intersection? Nothing? But that's when and where something happened? Where there's nothing? There's never been anything? Not a sound, not an image, not a witness, no dog picked up her scent further along, but she definitely kept going? And you're completely convinced? By what? Why are you convinced she continued after the last known image? It seems to me that THAT's a bigger leap of faith than under the wheel.

I'm not there. I can't get there. I can't physically touch that street, sniff the air.

I see the right front wheel of that truck in a position indicating that something's under it. Unless there's a photo of a 5 or 6" bump in the road, only on that side, I'm going with it's rolling over something. Something as substantial as a speed bump.

No one's even attempted to show that the right front wheel was flat on the pavement because it can't be shown. It's not flat on the pavement. There is no speed bump there. 30 threads later, there's no reasonable explanation for why the truck's front end is askew. Why not?

Show me a picture of the bump in that exact location that would cause a vehicle that size to so obviously be off kilter and I'll let it go. Really I will. Sincerely.

I don't think it's been solidly demonstrated to be impossible. 'Because I don't think so' doesn't work for me.

I've been scoffed at, schooled in personal versions of possible physics and I put it all away for a while. Went away, did other stuff.

But it's still there. The image is still there. It broke my heart the first time I saw it. I wept for an hour.

I'd love to be wrong. I want very badly for it to be nothing. I hate having that picture in my head.



Show me the 6" bump, give me some peace. Please.

I could be mistaken, but didn't LE issue a statement specifically stating Mickey wasn't under the truck some days ago in direct response to the conversation on here?

 

[jujube]

I could be mistaken, but didn't LE issue a statement specifically stating Mickey wasn't under the truck some days ago in direct response to the conversation on here?

LE said Mickey was not under the truck. They never said that her bike was not under the truck.

 

[cluciano63]

Who was it that called and asked about Mickey being under the truck? Maybe they should call back, ask about the bike and...end this.

 

[NewYork625]

I haven't read backwards yet, but on 6/14 at 4:58pm Red Haired Girl wrote "LE says that Mickey is not under the truck, there has not been any confirmation that anything else was there. From the pictures, it clearly appears that something was under that tire. Not MS, but maybe her bike, or backpack??"

 

[Deleted member 39678]

Yes. I get the impression that the mother doesn't like us and thinks we are foolish. Quite frankly, I feel foolish wasting all of my time trying to figure this out - especially when they aren't helping us to figure it out in ANY way shape or form.

I'm not sure if Mickeys family feels that WS or its members are foolish for trying to find her, but they got the idea from someone that it would be foolish to participate in a interview on WS radio.

I think that they may be misguided. JMO.

 

[fairest of them all]

good theory that they ran over the bike, but not her. i hadn't thought about that.

but how does this explain the sudden decrease in desire for outside help?
i'm not being snarky. just trying to process your theory.

Because all outside help was asked in helping find the wt ......notice how attention on wt decreased msm coverage decreased and rufusal of outside help all happened at about the same time...IMO wt was ruled out as perp from get go either because rule out criteria was on video or wt was identified or came forward....was made very clear IMO that wt was wanted for questioning as to what they saw.......

Now all the specifics about the truck were left vague Randall questions unanswered...in my opinion if wt was the perp le and family and pi sour have made specifics VERY CLEAR! and they didn't...so I think they left it vague because they ruled out wt as perp.......they weren't hoping that the public identify wt......they were hoping wt would say "that's my truck in the picture........yea I hit something in the road....yea I saw something/ or no I didn't see anything .....else.