Identified! LA - Slidell, WhtFem 20-30, UP852, Breast Implants, Pregnant Jun'86 Pamela Lee Hupp

  • #721
  • #722
Oh my. Yes. OMG. If this isn't her, I'll eat my hat. (I've done it before -- they're quite good lightly steamed and served with hollandaise.)
 

Attachments

  • Kathleen Beitzel with Lake Ponchartrain JD.png
    Kathleen Beitzel with Lake Ponchartrain JD.png
    166.5 KB · Views: 84
  • #723
It's possible, the petite frame, implants and the face do have similarities. Her DNA is in NAMUS tests were submitted however not complete as of @ a month ago. Now that NAMUS has removed identifiers from public view we will not know when they are complete publicly.
 
  • #724
Oh my. Yes. OMG. If this isn't her, I'll eat my hat. (I've done it before -- they're quite good lightly steamed and served with hollandaise.)
Everything and anything is good with hollandaise :p
 
  • #725
Oh my. Yes. OMG. If this isn't her, I'll eat my hat. (I've done it before -- they're quite good lightly steamed and served with hollandaise.)

Hahaha, eet smakelijk !(Dutch for 'enjoy your meal',). Stick with the hollandaise...
 
  • #726
Hopefully, someone submits Kathleen to NamUs as a potential match, even though last we knew her DNA was pending. Since we can't see their DNA profiles anymore we can pretend we don't know, LOL and just do it.
 
  • #727
Hopefully, someone submits Kathleen to NamUs as a potential match, even though last we knew her DNA was pending. Since we can't see their DNA profiles anymore we can pretend we don't know, LOL and just do it.

I'm still not sure about the age gap....Doe Network says she could have been 30, but Kathleen would have been 40 in 1986. I'm a WS member since 2016 and still have to learn a lot. I did submitted people to Namus, but then there would be a realistic (within ranges) match or all the stats would mostly add up.
 
  • #728
Oh my. Yes. OMG. If this isn't her, I'll eat my hat. (I've done it before -- they're quite good lightly steamed and served with hollandaise.)

Say what ........... a hat, steamed with hollandaise????
 
  • #729
I'm still not sure about the age gap....Doe Network says she could have been 30, but Kathleen would have been 40 in 1986. I'm a WS member since 2016 and still have to learn a lot. I did submitted people to Namus, but then there would be a realistic (within ranges) match or all the stats would mostly add up.

BOT, I will leave you with this ... Mary M had stated she was not rule out LPJD being in her 30's. In to her 40's may be a bit of a stretch but then again have seen cases with as much as a 15 year tolerance from what was initially thought to identification.

I truly wonder when the photo of Kathleen with the suit jacket on was taken? In that photo she appears tiny and has the appearance of a very young person.
 
  • #730
BOT, I will leave you with this ... Mary M had stated she was not rule out LPJD being in her 30's. In to her 40's may be a bit of a stretch but then again have seen cases with as much as a 15 year tolerance from what was initially thought to identification.

I truly wonder when the photo of Kathleen with the suit jacket on was taken? In that photo she appears tiny and has the appearance of a very young person.

I was going to say I thought she looked tiny, tiny in that blue outfit. Her fingers are odd looking, IMHO, but it could be the camera angle.
 
  • #731
I was going to say I thought she looked tiny, tiny in that blue outfit. Her fingers are odd looking, IMHO, but it could be the camera angle.

Indeed Alleykins it looks rather odd, it kind of reminds me when young kids you would dress up an press around in your mother's high heels, clothes and jewelry. It very well could be someone took a pic of the original photo from their phone, sometimes it will come out a bit distorted.
 
  • #732
In my experience, the age estimate of a UID is frequently wrong. Possibly wrong more often than height.
 
  • #733
  • #734
I was going to say I thought she looked tiny, tiny in that blue outfit. Her fingers are odd looking, IMHO, but it could be the camera angle.

Yes, indeed the hand looks odd.The other thing is that is looks like she almost doesn't have breasts, especially in the first picture with the brown shirt/dress. She could be very young there of course, but if she was built like that in general it would be kind of logical to take smaller breast implants. If the info about the breast implants is coming from the family it would mean that she had them before she went missing, the latest in 1979. Would that add up with what we know about the implants?
 
  • #735
Yes, indeed the hand looks odd.The other thing is that is looks like she almost doesn't have breasts, especially in the first picture with the brown shirt/dress. She could be very young there of course, but if she was built like that in general it would be kind of logical to take smaller breast implants. If the info about the breast implants is coming from the family it would mean that she had them before she went missing, the latest in 1979. Would that add up with what we know about the implants?

Its plausible and not out of the realm of possibilities
 
  • #736
:Bumping: This week will mark 32 years this young lady has remained unidentified. Hope DDP picks her case :) as it stands now just feel as thou this maybe the only means left to identify her. LPJD's remains are at LSU Faces I'm sure they would gladly extract her DNA then we can only hope its usable and not degraded.
 
  • #737
:Bumping: This week will mark 32 years this young lady has remained unidentified. Hope DDP picks her case :) as it stands now just feel as thou this maybe the only means left to identify her. LPJD's remains are at LSU Faces I'm sure they would gladly extract her DNA then we can only hope its usable and not degraded.

They've been working miracles extracting usable DNA, so here's hoping!
 
  • #738
32 Years has now passed. I truly hope and pray this will be the last year you go without your rightful name and are reunited with your loved ones.
 
  • #739
32 Years has now passed. I truly hope and pray this will be the last year you go without your rightful name and are reunited with your loved ones.

Still see (identifying) miracles happen. There is hope.
 
  • #740
Update - St Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office Case # 6-6084-86
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
78
Guests online
2,523
Total visitors
2,601

Forum statistics

Threads
633,153
Messages
18,636,477
Members
243,415
Latest member
n_ibbles
Back
Top