- Joined
- Feb 14, 2021
- Messages
- 4,765
- Reaction score
- 9,478
Just thinking aloud here….could the ring line be from a class ring? I know a lot of people I went to high school with wore their class rings on their left hand before they were married. It may fit if she was on the younger end of the age range. And it would definitely help ID her, a reason for a killer removing it more so than a wedding band. Just MOO.
It could be any kind of ring. I (we?) always assumed the ring was taken off by her killer (most likely) for preventing identification...she might as well thrown it away herself....fed up with the marriage or whatever situation.
@Bit of hope @folieadeuxnola - I received confirmation from LSU FACES that Kathleen Beitzel (NamUs #MP40487) is NOT a DNA match to Unidentified Female (NamUs #UP852, LSU 03-35).Lost and Found shows Kathleen as, Status Samples submitted - Tests not complete
As to whether their is an update since they were able to last acquire that status do not know since NAMUS changed the ability to view the identifiers.
@Bit of hope @folieadeuxnola - I received confirmation from LSU FACES that Kathleen Beitzel (NamUs #MP40487) is NOT a DNA match to Unidentified Female (NamUs #UP852, LSU 03-35).
Implants can always be traced back because of their unique markings but its 86 and omg i cant believe implants of that caliber even existed, i wonder how toxic the materials must've been back then. They're kind of harmful in this day and age but imagine in the 80s..She was exhumed a few years ago (can't really remember exactly) and LSU faces lab was doing some work with her case. If I remember right, they can't get a match on her breast implants, but I can't recall why. Here is a couple of links for her.
http://www.lsu.edu/faceslab/unidentified/1986.htm
http://www.wdsu.com/news/2570317/detail.html
If I remember correctly from this thread, serial numbers on breast implants didn't come until late 80s/early 90s. And then we don't even know if she had the procedure in the US, either.Implants can always be traced back because of their unique markings but its 86
Date found: | 1986-06-19 |
PMI: | 2 days or less |
Location: | Saint Tammany Parish, Louisiana |
Est. age at death: | 20 to 30 |
Sex: | Female |
Race: | white |
Hair color: | auburn |
Height: | 62 to 66 inches |
Weight: | 126 pounds |
Dental Records: | Available |
DNA Records: | Available |
FACES Case #: | 03-35 |
I don't agree with the breast implants part, because they could have placed after someone went missing.I think she was either never reported missing or she was and her report was lost and collecting dust in a police department somewhere. I dont think she is a missing person in any database as the breast implants are very distinctive and would have been mentioned in any missing person case.
Interesting. I wouldn't associate this woman's teeth with perfect. But then again in the description of Jane Doe it could mean perfectly healthy. Hopes up.At the original article, the author implies that the unidentified decedent is this woman:
Kathryn Grace Knox Zedick
At the original article, the author implies that the unidentified decedent is this woman:
Kathryn Grace Knox Zedick
Yeah but don’t you think someone would recognize such a distinctive feature also are the Breast implants traceableI don't agree with the breast implants part, because they could have placed after someone went missing.
I don't agree with the breast implants part, because they could have placed after someone went missing.
I guess your right but that is still such a distinctive feature surely someone must recognize them or they should be traceableIndeed. Also, she may not have told people about the implants. Someone in my family didn't tell their closest siblings. I only found out by accident. I am still not supposed to know.
I guess your right but that is still such a distinctive feature surely someone must recognize them or they should be traceable
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.