Do you mean from May until the next search? Parents probably not allowed to touch anything.Crazy it sat there the whole time!
Sent from my SM-T320 using Tapatalk
Can someone refresh my memory please. Exactly how did Laura meet DM in the very beginning?
Do you mean from May until the next search? Parents probably not allowed to touch anything.
I assume this is the kind of bag that was found in MS's house?
http://www.ottawaprices.ca/Product/...uffle-id=d3c5b3ad-cbff-460d-a1e3-5a572dd9699c
These guys are both so dumb. Smich doesn't take the tag off of the bag? I wouldn't be surprised if DM gave Laura's jewelry to his girlfriend since he is also cheap. Guess we won't know.
Did we find out what was inside of that bag today BTW?
These guys are both so dumb. Smich doesn't take the tag off of the bag? I wouldn't be surprised if DM gave Laura's jewelry to his girlfriend since he is also cheap. Guess we won't know.
Did we find out what was inside of that bag today BTW?
Where did you find that?
The thing that struck me the most about today's testimony is the revelation that Mark Smich had CLEARLY taken possession of the iPad on July 4th. Marlena Meneses testified that she was annoyed that he got it because it was promised to her by Millard. How could that be? For him to promise it to her a) she would have had to be there that night or b) she would have had to have had prior knowledge that it was becoming available. Given that SL had only given the iPad to LB about a week previous, and from prior testimony, me know that LB did not see Millard during the days between. So how would Millard know there was an iPad and how could he promise it to Meneses?
Both scenarios seem unlikely. Meneses very likely was unaware of the crime given that Smich kicked her out of the garage when he boasted about it to friends, although she did appear in the video for the same song. But why does she testify about having prior knowledge about it?
My only explanation would be that Millard already had an iPad that he wasn't using. At some point he tells her that maybe he'll give it to her. When Smich shows up with the SL iPad, he tells Meneses that it is the one that Millard wasn't using. So she may not have been aware of the SL iPad at all, and may not have known when she testified.
Where did you find that?
Sent from my SM-T320 using Tapatalk
Oh I just think she was being told anything by Millard. I also don't think she was completely honest on the stand, as with all of the Millard and Smich friends during the Bosma murder trial.
But how could she be told about an iPad that Millard didn't even know about?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.