I'm confident you are correct. The entire house, the outbuildings would be listed separately in the description but if the Judge agreed they had probable cause to search, that's all that is required. The law has been carefully followed in this case. There will be no constitutional challenge on today's search.
all, JMO
I agree with you, MyBelle. I don't see a constitutional challenge either.
IF LE were to put in the warrant they wanted access to every square inch of the home, property, and outbuildings where a small item might be concealed, I think the judge would grant that access. IMO, that would include all areas up to and including grass, ground, any dirt, etc. That would include every square inch, IMO. IF LE were trying to locate cell phones, and possibly tiny sim cards, those are small enough to have possibly been concealed anywhere on the property or anywhere inside the home. We will possibly get to see these search warrants if there is ever a trial in this case. The warrants will be detailed to the nth degree, IMO, along with an extremely detailed description of the entire property and home.
There is an area teen who murdered his parents and LE was looking for ammo, weapon, and anything connected as to where it could be concealed. They had unfettered (lol, a JT word) access to every inch of that home and property. LE found everything they were looking for. That trial is about to start. He is being tried as an adult.
Sorry to interrupt the flow of the posts because I have not as yet caught up. I guess I just don't understand the debate about the warrant. LE and the FBI are gonna be sure to cover their respective azzes.
MOO
