LE wants to interview the parents separately

[frankie069]

Snipped by me for space and only this quote:

In response to your second post: I really don't care WHO started the Innocence Project. I do care how many innocent people have been released from prison after decades, even released from death row. These are people who were INNOCENT of the crime they were convicted of. And they've lost years of their lives.

I am all for the prosecution of the guilty. But I am equally for the rights that allow USA citizens to defend themselves against unjust prosecution.

I do care who started the innocence project, it shows why it was started but on the other hand, decades ago we didnt have the DNA testing we have today. You dont today find that very often someone innocent has been put in jail for something they did not do. Most of these people are from many many many years ago and we can now process their DNA correctly. It is sad that there are times an innocent person is jailed. On this hand though, you have parents who are not cooperating. Their words. Come on, they want different LE brought in?? Who are they to ask for that. They need to start speaking to the police and I stand by every single statement I have made on these forums.

 

[TorisMom003]

When LE releases a statement to the media that they want "unrestricted" interview time with the parents, how is the public supposed to take that? What does that mean? Does it mean that it would be ok with LE for the lawyer to be in the room at the time of the interview? Then it would not be "unrestricted" would it? After all, the lawyer will speak up and advise their client to not answer certain questions. So yes, IMO LE wants to speak with the parents seperately and without their lawyer present.

MOO

 

[norest4thewicked]

I could be wrong, but LE collected the computer from the home. I'm sure it has been analyzed by now.

Left field, I know, but kind of related: Look at baby Christopher's abduction circumstances. The family, at least as far as I can tell from the website, strongly believes Christopher's father's "girlfriend" or "affair" or whatever she was is a suspect in his abduction.

While Baby Lisa's abduction would perhaps be random, it could also be by the hands of someone close to the family (an affair, etc.), or a family member.

If it were me, I would want to talk to LE with my lawyer to see what the forensics on the computer and house revealed. I would have a burning gnawing NEED to know or at least try to find out!

I guess we'll just have to see how this plays out, or if it plays out at all. Sigh.

Great post! Another reason that you would want to help LE find your child.

 

[TheDuchess]

I am very familiar with LE and I can tell you that they wouldn't be saying that if there wasn't a reason.

I am at work, but don't have time to look up the cases, but I can probably come up with over 20 cases right off the bat where LE interrogated innocent people and accused them of being guilty. It happens all the time! I'm not saying it is right or wrong, but we already know that not only do innocent people get accused of guilt, they also give false confessions.

I think LE is doing their jobs, but is obviously focusing mostly on the parents, most likely DB.

They need to stop asking them if they are guilty. Even if they are, they will continue to say no. So ask questions that actually could lead to Lisa.

 

[Geralyn]

I would be looked at as guilty then because there is no way that I would allow LE to interegate me yet again without my lawyer present. I can only look at this as how I would react and how I would feel. To me, it is as if LE is focusing so much on the parents (mom more so than dad) that they are neglecting to look at other options or possibilities. I would not allow them to badger me and accuse me of killing my child repeatedly for however many hours they wanted to instead of actually doing police work and looking for the person that took my child.

LE wants to talk to them again? Fine, but be prepared to have the lawyer present and ready to stop the interview at the first sign of trying to pin it on the parents.

MOO

BBM.
Thats really what I hope they do.

I wish I had the link, I'm sorry I don't...but reportedly they were in negotiation with LE to resubmit to more questioning, but with stipulations? The one that stood out in memory is that the same detectives as last time aren't used. (the ones that accused her of murder or disappearance of baby)

Anyhow, I hope those negotiations are still ongoing and result in a resolution that gets both parties back on the same page. :::sigh:::

 

[lauriej]

..it sounds like they were interviewed seperately in this transcription ( by the awesome "not_my_kids". )

10/17/2011 - Megyn Kelly interview with parents – Pt. 3
http://video.insider.foxnews.com/v/1...olygraph-test/


MK: “How far into it did they accuse you?”
DB: “Couple hours.”
MK: “Really?”
DB: “Yeah.”
MK: “Into the first interview?”
DB: “Yeah.”
JI: “Yeah.”
MK: “What did they say?”
DB: “’You did it,’ ‘Where is, where’s she at?’ You know, stuff like that. I can’t really get into that. I don’t wanna affect the investigation, it’s not about clearing my name. “
MK: “Did they do that same thing to you, Jeremy?”
JI: ”Yeah, uh, yeah, they did, very the same thing. They first told me it was her, then later, they told me it was me and that an accident had happened, or, yeah.”

[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7273999&postcount=40"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - compare the parent's statements to media here[/ame]

 

[tehcloser]

I have plenty to say........but I like it here. It's Satsuma all over again. Arrest em' already.

 

[Cappuccino]

It would be normal practice to interview the parents separately straight away, would it not?

 

[norest4thewicked]

This is JMO-But If I am innocent-I would take my lawyer with me to the interview-I would not care who interviewed me or whether its restricted or unrestricted..who cares-ask me all the questions you want-give me LDT- just clear me -so you can look in other directions for my baby-this should have happened a long time ago--precious time has been lost due to this family's games..its really not a good sign for Lisa..WOW

Unfortunately, I think that is the point of the games...to stall LE so that it is less likely they find Lisa...

 

[alwaysonmymind]

never once has it been stated by LE that they do not want an atty present when they interview the parents seperately. That came ONLY from the parents attys and the parents. LE never said it and it is wrong to imply that it came from LE.

I haven't seen or heard that anywhere except someone posting here without a link.

LE would not say that.

 

[Rooster27]

Second page of this ABC report.

The man in the photograph has been questioned by the police several times, but the other witnesses, a couple who live three houses down from the Irwin house, said the photo did not match the man they say they saw with a baby the night Lisa disappeared.

"No, I don't recognize him," the woman said when shown the photo. "He was tall and slender and, as far as his head, we thought he was bald."
Did anyone get an odd feeling when they read that.
Tall thin and they thought he could have been bald.

I haven't been reading today's threads so maybe this is yesterday's old news, but is this the first we have heard of tall and then and possibly bald? And that probably now, the two sightings (the first couple and motorcycle man) are not identifying a similar looking man?

I think this is what many of us suspected would be true.

Again, JMO

 

[Marshmallow]

When LE releases a statement to the media that they want "unrestricted" interview time with the parents, how is the public supposed to take that? What does that mean? Does it mean that it would be ok with LE for the lawyer to be in the room at the time of the interview? Then it would not be "unrestricted" would it? After all, the lawyer will speak up and advise their client to not answer certain questions. So yes, IMO LE wants to speak with the parents seperately and without their lawyer present.

MOO

IMO unrestricted means they'd like the parents to cooperate, it in no way says "without an atty present" that is just a rumor startedto turen people with a bias against LE . I ask you: who would deliberately not cooperate when their baby is gone?


without an atty present is nothing more than gossip and slander being used against LE by this family. LE has never stated it. Never.

 

[Camille]

No they havent answered specific questions, I will take LE's word for this. If you are innocent, you have no problem doing this. And I believe someone had added up the time they spent with LE answering questions and LAST WEEK that averaged out to be less than an hour a day. Now its a shorter amount of time. There is no excuse for that behavior and they want special and different LE brought in for this. You dont get a choice in the matter. The FBI should be grilling them in separate rooms. Just like they do on TV.. Put one against the other so one of them talks. I have no issue with this at all. One of them will talk. They need to get them apart and as far as I know this hasnt been done yet. Its been BOTH parents. Not just one at a time. They need separate lawyers for this. Thats also how you can tell this hasnt been done because one lawyer cannot do both clients questioned separately. Conflict of interest.

Let's say that someone has taken your child and you know this without a doubt. When you report it the police get in your face for hours and accuse you of killing your child. Every time that you talk to them they don't ask you anything about anything that has anything to do with your missing child unless it is them pointing a finger at you and asking you what you did with that child.


How long do you put up with it even though you know you are innocent and had nothing to do with it? A to of people keep saying if you have nothing to hide then you won't mind talking to the police but if their actions are abusive and appear to be useless how long do you put up with the abuse?

 

[frankie069]

When LE releases a statement to the media that they want "unrestricted" interview time with the parents, how is the public supposed to take that? What does that mean? Does it mean that it would be ok with LE for the lawyer to be in the room at the time of the interview? Then it would not be "unrestricted" would it? After all, the lawyer will speak up and advise their client to not answer certain questions. So yes, IMO LE wants to speak with the parents seperately and without their lawyer present.

MOO

Once you lawyer up, they CANNOT speak to you without your lawyer present unless you give them permission and even then most of the time LE wont do it. Thats why they want you before you lawyer up. No one on Gods green earth is telling these parents that they cannot have their lawyer there, they are not allowed to tell them that, unless DB and JI are suddenly now going to use the defense that they hear voices in their heads....

 

[Rooster27]

i did put the quote from the press article in quotes, but they did not appear, sorry.

 

[marge_rita]

Well maybe they are convinced their attorneys can find Lisa and the police are not needed for anything.

Honestly, rights are all well and good and it is a relief we have them, but I just don't understand how people even think of their own rights if their child is gone, maybe in danger, maybe deceased, maybe being kept by a pervert...only LE seems concerned about Lisa's rights as a person. JMO

Powerful words. :thumb:

 

[Cappuccino]

It often seems to me that a few are more concernerd with the 'poor parents' than the child who is missing and desperately needs to be found. Baby Lisa deserves justice.


imo

It seems to me that some of us just don't see how railroading the parents is going to do Lisa any good.

 

[frankie069]

It often seems to me that a few are more concernerd with the 'poor parents' than the child who is missing and desperately needs to be found. Baby Lisa deserves justice.


imo

Thank you for saying that.. I second your post... Makes me sick. :furious:

 

[norest4thewicked]

So LE will never arrest innocent people?

That's not what I said. The bottom line here is pretty clear to see. LE wants to find whoever caused Lisa to be missing. DB and JI are more worried about their own inconveniences than finding their daughter. This is a very simple concept and speaks VOLUMES to me.

 

[Marshmallow]

Let's say that someone has taken your child and you know this without a doubt. When you report it the police get in your face for hours and accuse you of killing your child. Every time that you talk to them they don't ask you anything about anything that has anything to do with your missing child unless it is them pointing a finger at you and asking you what you did with that child.


How long do you put up with it even though you know you are innocent and had nothing to do with it? A to of people keep saying if you have nothing to hide then you won't mind talking to the police but if their actions are abusive and appear to be useless how long do you put up with the abuse?

that scenario might work better if the mother in this case hadn't already given several versions of her story.