I am not on a fence, I am certain the Ramseys are innocent.
I will start with motive, the Ramseys had absolutely no motive to murder their child, their history is clearly that of loving parents. John had older girls who adored him, Patsy was the oldest of three girls ,this in itself offers patience and learned parenting skills, she clearly was devoted ,caring and sharing when it came to her child rearing. She was neither selfish nor distant. She was involved at every level with her children, in their schools, in their activities and in their homelife. Patsy was not a fanatical Christian in the sense that she isolated her family from others through either Christian home schooling or limiting relationships to only the "godly". Her children smiled often, were socially well adapted and shared their playtime with many, both among close friends and among neighborhood kids. No one had a bad thing to say about Patsy, unless they thought they could cash in, such as LHP months after the murder.
From the first moments the police arrived at the home, they lied about what they saw, they needed the killer to be a parent, in all of their claims they tried to shove this idea down the throats of the public through media leaks.
There were no footprints in the snow, because there was no snow on the walkways. (get over this) The doors were secured the windows were locked. In reality there were many windows unlocked, some with cords running Christmas lighting through them, others opened to allow for ventilation, and at least one door was ajar.
The door that showed tampering was said by police to be old tampering, however in interview the locksmith said this was not a fact , the door showed NEW tampering, and not only was this a fact but the police had deliberately twisted his words and LIED.
The spider web story, do you know when they discovered this web? Wasn't it after the murder on a fifty degree afternoon? No one knows the details of this twisted information.
No parent would have the need to clean their prints off of their own flashlight.
Putting a teabag in a glass is an odd habit that no one in the Ramsey household had ever done before, why would they choose that night to put a teabag in a glass. This is a clue, someone that does something this odd, could be known to friends or family members.
Jonbenet had a life sized barbie doll, you all think the barbie nightgown was hers, when in fact it could very well have been "barbie's nightgown" , which would add more perversion to this crime than a parent could muster.
Patsy's jacket was multi-colored, yet four fibers of red acrylic were attached to the tape over Jonbenet's mouth. Of course they are consistent, as they would be consistent with most red articles of clothing at Christmastime.
Many ,many fibers that can NOT be sourced to that household were on both her body, and on the blanket that covered her. We CAN NOT disregard these, they came from somewhere, they are not on the bed in the parents room, they are not on the bed in Burke's room, they are not to be found anywhere but on Jonbenet and that blanket. THIS is a huge clue. Sure one can ditch some clothing, but not ditch the fibers in every other area of the home.
The beaver hair, forget about Patsy owning beaver boots, this is a MYTH. There isn't a beaver hair in her closet, in her room, or anywhere else in that house.
Think however, about the fur found in her hands, she had no access to her dog that night, of which we are aware, this is a huge clue. If the police have sourced this , it has not leaked, if it turns out to be from her dog, we must re-think a few things.
Motive, motive, sadly there are about eight people surrounding this child and her family that had motives including but not limited to jealousy,obsession, fantasy, rage, we can name these people can't we. Even more sad, many of these people had keys to the house.
