IMO this is a very good analysis of George's WHY? WHY? WHY? letter.
Friday, June 25, 2010
George Anthony Letter to Casey Anthony 2010
.....seamusoriley.blogspot.......
http://***************************/2010/06/george-anthony-letter-to-casey-anthony.html
excerpt:
"We do not find a denial in the letter. Rather than a denial, we have the question "WHY" which leads us to ask:
is he asking why did she disclose this? We must see if this is supported within the letter. There is one word that sticks out that tells me that
George had been concerned for a long time; likely since the beginning, that this would come out. "
"Jose "delivered" the news, in Chaney's office.
George is humiliated. One attorney delivers it in the other's office; both are in on his humiliation."
"It is likely that George and Casey had discussed this sensitive topic since Caylee's death and George now was asked 2 questions, personally, by the attorney which
he questions why Casey would have such a thing delivered to him."
'"This may help the public understand why he has not visited "Gorgeous" for a long time.
There is no denial. Ask yourself: if you had been accused, falsely, of molestation, what would you say? Would you ask why?
Most people agree: they would say, plainly, and with no need of emphasis:
I didn't do it."
_________________________________________________________
I have read posters guessing before that JB would have browbeaten George into not deny Casys accusations because he would be calling her a liar. However, George could have easily denied the accusations without calling her a liar.
For one thing her accusations about George are very mild
She claimed that her father may have abused her. She claims that memories are coming back to her now and she is beginning to realize that her father may also have come into her bedroom at night to molest her when she was very young.
George could have easily gone on GMA and said that he never abused or molested his daughter that he often came to her bedroom at night when she as young, like any good father, to check she was safe and well. And that in the the horrible confines of her jail cell for 2 years without being in any contact with her family may have her remembering waking up at night with him hovering over her and made it in to something it wasnt. Thus, the states refusal to let them visit and talk it out and clear the air is cruel and unusual punishment etc.
He could have easily written the same to Casey in jail, but he did not.
He could easily have denied it without making things worse for KC (as if they could be much worse).
I never put much stock in the possibility of an incestuous relationship between George and KC until I read the letters he sent to her in prison. But after reading them, I am sure there was at least emotional incest on his part.
He always refers to her as in physical terms, Gorgeous and Beautiful, he is much more concerned about her physically then mentally. He sounds much more like a man writing his lover then his daughter.
He states, I love you, I need us, and I need to see you (yes, he even underlines it)
In the letter where he does not deny a relationship he makes the very telling slip
I have tried, sacrificed, continued to have you
After reading his letters I went back and looked at the jail visit videos, and they are the same, his same sick flattery and always referring to her looks, and I am convinced there is something horribly sexually wrong about the way he views his daughter.
_________________________________________________________________
I soo get what both of you are saying.
Don't get me wrong, I would
NOT be surprised to learn that KC had lied about GA (&LA) as far as the accusations she's made. However, I also have run across things that have seemed "off" to me.
I started watching the jail visitation video's again and in this first one, CA is asking about KC talking to a pyschologist. This is not verbatim but darn close.:
CA: Have you spoken with a psychologist yet?
KC: Everyday. That's who I was talking to when you saw me sitting at the table.
CA: Are you able to freely speak with her or is it recorded?
KC: No, it's not recorded.
CA Do you feel that you can open up to her?
KC: No.
CA: Ok, understood.
KC: We've talked about how I feel about things but I'm not opening up to someone I don't know. The only person that I have would be Jose- I mean, for obvious reasons- he's someone I know I need to trust. That I've started to trust.
Around the 8:00 mark
http://www.wftv.com/video/18206256/index.html
What bothers me with the above conversation is that is seems like CA only wants to know if KC is spilling the beans. Once she hears that KC says no she isn't opening up to her, she leaves it at "ok, understood". Why doesn't she instead encourage KC to open up, so that maybe they can get to the bottom of what happened to Caylee??? IDK.....it just sounds so fishy to me.
_______________________________________________________
Now we have part 2 of the same visitation, and it starts out with GA telling KC that the longer this goes on, other stuff could come out. WTH!!? What other stuff is he afraid of surfacing?? Why is it "very critical" to get KC out before this additional stuffs hits everyone?? And what is up with "if I could get you out right now I would, but I want Caylee back too" He wants Caylee back too? too? Shouldn't getting Caylee back be foremost on his agenda? IDK....to me this is just so weird, so fishy. Something is not on the up and up here. I don't know what....but something. Again not verbatim but darn close.
GA: the longer this drags on, there's gonna be maybe additional things that might hit everyone and I don't want to get into that with you but - it's getting very critical - we gotta get you out of here. If I could get you out of here right now I would, but we gotta get Caylee back too.............I want to take away your pain.........
http://www.wftv.com/video/18206653/index.html
Starts at very beginning.
Then in this video GA is talking about Caylee's personality. He says that she has an
excitable personality. Now, I don't have a link, but I am positive I remember GA talking with, either LE or FBI and he describes KC's personality as
"exciting". Does anyone else remember this and know where the link to it is? I reacted with a shiver the first time I heard him say that and it gives me an "EW" shiver hearing him speak of Caylee like that. I am not making any accusations, b/c KC is such an accomplished liar, but I am saying that it struck me as creepy to hear GA describe KC that way, and to hear him describe Caylee that way. And I first heard that way b/f any letters surfaced. It just isn't an adjective that I would use as a parent or grand parent to describe my child or grand child of the opposite sex. KWIM???
Around the 23:00 mark
http://www.wftv.com/video/18206395/index.htm
Honestly I don't know that I can say that I believe either way, he did or he didn't, IDK. But I can say that something feels "warped" in the father/daughter relationship.
And they all seem to be a little delusional where KC is concerned don't they?
Because GA in the bottom video around the 24;20 mark, he starts talking about how KC got alot of CA's good traits and maybe from him is where KC got the being consumed about making sure your car runs. WHAT?? Did he really just say that? To the girl who doesn't even stop to put gas in her car??? GEESH!
Around 24:20
http://www.wftv.com/video/18206395/index.html
:cow:
