LIVE MSM COVERAGE on BABY LISA - 24 OCTOBER 2011

[LancelotLink]

Why the spin? I have to continue to ask myself this question in these cases. Why not maintain quiet counsel and wait for the investigation to be completed rather than spin stories?

I agree. They have nothing else, so they attack LE as if they were the enemy.
My opinion of these lawyers and PI is pretty low, but we saw this before. We know that ABC, NBC, etc. pay for pictures and videos, so the family is making flipping wadges of cash with each new story. This is a win-win for everyone but LE and Lisa. The lawyers and media keep this "bizarre" case in the news, adding a new twist everyday. Ratings, spin, cha-ching.

Also, I noticed early on that they stopped using the name Pumpkin Pie and DB used the "brand" Baby Lisa that reporters were beginning to use. That hit me like a punch in the gut.

Add to that, the strange way DB would thank the reporters for coming, like you thank someone for showing up at a funeral. It sounded strange then and still does, to me. I think she has been playing to the media and this is becomming the newest in realty TV.

and plese, let me add, I don't find it strange fora parent to thank the media for being there and getting the story out. It was the WAY it was said that pinged for me.

 

[lil momma]

Does anyone know that the neighbor claiming to see a man walking around with a baby, wasn't the same neighbor that was over the house that night? Who is the neighbor that was over drinking with Deborah that night?

sorry if i missed it

 

[Abby Normal]

I was a bit taken aback by the attorney on the Today show. He said the decomp hit by the doggie was much ado about nothing, but IMHO seemed to be placing great weight in the white blob shown on the video.

So the decomp hit is just junk science/garbage - but the white blob should be found immediately?

:waitasec:

MOO

Mel

I agree that he's over focussing on the white blob bit. Unless they have some great technology that makes things clearer- it's completely useless IMO.

 

[butwhatif?]

This kind of thinking is why Casey Anthony was not convicted. It's the CSI effect.

RSBM:
LOL....why do peeps always refer to CSI? I can't stand that show. :maddening:

I understand they can't take everything, but I had also wondered out loud here why doing blood alcohol testing wasn't SOP. I guess I'm still hung up on that, and the wine cask would be the next best thing.

And my concern has everthing to do with KC not being convicted. That was my concern from the day I started following that case.

You can never have too much evidence when it comes to justice. Didn't they say, 'leave no stone unturned'?

MOO

 

[matou]

Sorry, I need to go back a few days to ask a question. On Saturday night, Joe Tacopina was on Judge Jeanine on FOX at 9 pm. He stated a few things:

JI called 911 from his phone.
JI went across the street to the neighbour. WHY? Why not go the the house next door, where the person lives who was in his house with his kids to ask what happened? At this point, it's unclear to me if DB also ran out and went across the street as well. Judge J interrupts Joe while he's speaking. He mentions DB shaking on the floor (in her house?).

So why did JI go across the road? This is really bugging me.

 

[justbeachy]

It's totally cool for you to be irritated by that. To each their own. Something I would think about though, think about Mark Klaas or any other "model" parent. Unless they suddenly started looking like Jesus, or random hippie band members, then they were going to the barber more than once during their ordeal.

I can't think of any reason there should be a double standard for men and women. If innocent men can continue to function and tend to their appearances, then so can women IMO.

MOO, and like I said- it's totally cool if it bothers you. I think sometimes we just question women for things that men get away with no problem.

Respectfully, this has nothing to do (for me) with a man vs woman thing. This has to do with it being, IMO, a cut vs a makeover. Above I posted my opinions about this being a strategic move vs a necessity. I didn't word it that way in my previous post, but you get the gist.

I stand by my opinion that her actions infuriate me. Trimming your bangs to keep them out of your eyes is one thing. To me, this isn't that. You are entitled to your opinion as well. As you said, to each their own.

 

[Lera213]

I will not watch ABC ever again no matter what!

 

[Patty G]

Thinking outside of the box for a second, the carpet that was shown being carried out of the house may have been on top of the carpet in the parent's bedroom.

 

[LancelotLink]

:waitasec: Sure looks like they took a carpet!

I have seen pics of them taking it out. I have seen pics of them taking it back down the driveway. Heck, I tried to watch the live stream, but for the longest, they IMO asked the cameras to train only on the back yard, so I have no idea what they took from the party rooms in the basement. Voddka? Who knows?

 

[Abby Normal]

Evidence of what though? That they had legally purchased wine? I don't understand what everyone thinks they are to do with any leftover wine. It isn't proof of a crime, it isn't against the law, it's just leftover wine. What am I missing?

They would have no need for wine in a court room. Photos of the box, and what was remaining would be plenty if they wanted to establish consumption. It's not scientifically accurate though, since two were drinking and we don't know if any spilled. So they would more likely use her own media confession if they wanted to establish consumption. And likely they have her admitting to drinking in interrogation too. I don't think they need the wine itself.

 

[LancelotLink]

I will not watch ABC ever again no matter what!

Somenoe plese refresh my memory. Was it disclosed if and which network was paying for WildBS?

 

[Kat]

If the carpet being taken out of the house in the picture was being taken into evidence wouldn't it have been covered in plastic? Usually they will cover it with something to keep from getting transfer on it before they can process it?

Just some thoughts, I have no clue.

 

[Sigh Sister]

Sorry, I need to go back a few days to ask a question. On Saturday night, Joe Tacopina was on Judge Jeanine on FOX at 9 pm. He stated a few things:

JI called 911 from his phone.
JI went across the street to the neighbour. WHY? Why not go the the house next door, where the person lives who was in his house with his kids to ask what happened? At this point, it's unclear to me if DB also ran out and went across the street as well. Judge J interrupts Joe while he's speaking. He mentions DB shaking on the floor (in her house?).

So why did JI go across the road? This is really bugging me.

Not sure where I read or heard it, but JI said he went to the neighbor's to see if Lisa was there.

 

[LancelotLink]

Sorry, I need to go back a few days to ask a question. On Saturday night, Joe Tacopina was on Judge Jeanine on FOX at 9 pm. He stated a few things:

JI called 911 from his phone.
JI went across the street to the neighbour. WHY? Why not go the the house next door, where the person lives who was in his house with his kids to ask what happened? At this point, it's unclear to me if DB also ran out and went across the street as well. Judge J interrupts Joe while he's speaking. He mentions DB shaking on the floor (in her house?).

So why did JI go across the road? This is really bugging me.

Good question.

 

[jjenny]

I agree that he's over focussing on the white blob bit. Unless they have some great technology that makes things clearer- it's completely useless IMO.

The video of this blob is of such poor quality I don't think it can be enhanced much. So I am frankly amazed press is calling the blob a man-how do they know the blob isn't female?

 

[Patty G]

Sorry, I need to go back a few days to ask a question. On Saturday night, Joe Tacopina was on Judge Jeanine on FOX at 9 pm. He stated a few things:

JI called 911 from his phone.
JI went across the street to the neighbour. WHY? Why not go the the house next door, where the person lives who was in his house with his kids to ask what happened? At this point, it's unclear to me if DB also ran out and went across the street as well. Judge J interrupts Joe while he's speaking. He mentions DB shaking on the floor (in her house?).

So why did JI go across the road? This is really bugging me.

I may have missed that the neighbor who was at the house lives next door, did DB say the neighbor lived next door?

 

[Elley Mae]

The video of this blob is of such poor quality I don't think it can be enhanced much. So I am frankly amazed press is calling the blob a man-how do they know the blob isn't female?

Females know not to wear white after Labor Day? j/k

 

[daisy7]

:waitasec: Sure looks like they took a carpet!

AFAIK, they took a carpet out, unrolled it on the driveway, and then took it back inside. I believe that pic. is showing them taking in back inside.

 

[Just K]

I didn't pick up anything new except that it was Franzia boxed wine and that the box was empty

It will be interesting if that is a prop and that the real box was taken by LE, in a search, or if they were unable to locate the actual box bought on Monday, October 3, 2011. Certainly, LE took pics of every room in the house on their first search. Many things are different now. In the first inside report, after the crime scene tape came down, the camera panned to the window in the computer room. The screen, unbent, was learning against the wall and just to the right of the window. In Yesterday's video, with the attorney, CS, it was not there anymore.

 

[kljohnson0458]

I still want to know WTH this neighbor is that was drinking on the stoop with DB. Why is she either not being talked to or anything she says being released.