JW finishes her last Question for her expert witness, and before she even can grab her stuff and leave the podium, Juan jumps up and asks the witness:
JM:Remember sir, you said ‘I would have re-administered if I thought about it?
And you provided us with some raw data right?
DS: No, I did not provide the defense team with that data….
Jm:T
here is raw data associated with this test, rght?
Ds:Yes
Jm:Lets take a look at it –ex 550 -PTS test, circles filled in…
Obj/SIDEBAR
[ during sidebar, juan goes to his desk and retrieves other papers to show the judge—she leafs thru them/while JW fights hard to distract her…]
[ After sidebar,Juan goes to the evidence clerk, gets a paper]
Then he angrily goes to the overhead and shows that exhibit of the raw data—
Exhibit 535: LOOK AT THIS, these numbers are different…right?
DS; Yes, I scored that twice…
JM; Compare to ex. 550—look, the numbers do not correspond—you changed this, right?
DS;... I misplaced that particular wksheet, so in preparation for testimony I rescored it. But …both scores meet the criteria…
JM; you are making all of these changes aren’t you sir? one is totalling 17 pts the highest she could score…
DS; No, I scored that twice…
JM :u did tell us that u didn’t need to retest her on this, right? Cuz according to u she would stay the same..right?
DS; yes…..I think I said that..
JM- But isn’t she already at the maximum of 17? On 550…
DS; yes..but…
JM;
Sir, did you ever tell us that you had misplaced the original raw data sheet? You didn’t tell us that did you?
DS;
No, I don’t think I did.
[He says his first visit w/ the killer was “ 2, 3, or 4 hours…” he seems rattled.]
[Exhibit submitted= definition of compassion. LOL ]
DS:“ My nature is to help people who are in trouble..”
JM:So that is part of your bias…
DS;“ My training of 35 yrs has taught to be nonbiased, and objective....”
JM;
“ let’s look at that 35 yrs of training, shall we … the PTS report..”
“ You left out pertinent information, correct? “
{ rewind to 44;00 to see Doc getting really upset w/Juan.] lol
[You can see some real anger there.. the doc has a hissy fit...]
JM; ...with the PDS test; u were asked, why didn’t u do it again? right?
You said, the answers would have been the same---
This hypothesis was formed at the first meeting, wasn’t it?
DS; No, it was not. It was months later…
JM; Ok, u say it does not matter what the triggering event was, correct?
DS;For the scoring, it did not matter…
JM;Ex 540; non sexual assault by a stranger, not important, right?
DS;“ in both of her stories, someone was killed and her life was threatened…”
JM; Both of those stories were told by the same person, so doesn’t 1 of them have to be untrue?
DS;Yes..
JM;So doesn’t that make her second version suspect?
DS; no..
JM;
So her answers on 16 to 21 are considerd VALID to you?
Even tho one was based on a lie?
DS:That’s right…
JM; Isnt it true that you consider them so because you have compassion for her?
Isnt it true that you have changed exhibit 550/and 535, because u are biased towards the D?
Isnt it true that it is an ethical issue for you, that you have ex 535 as the ONLY raw data, but then u had exhibit 550, calculated differently…
[Look at 53;50===look at the 3 faces at the DT table…when Samels is trying to justify his major ethical gaffe..]
[@5500= Juan goes in for the jugular… ex 534…]
from 55:00 to the sidebar at 59:00, Juan is leading the doc to his trap. And Doc’s mouth is so dry he cannot even swallow. It is worth watching it again for the lolz.
JW MARCHED up the bench like her hair was on fire.

She couldn’t stop this line of discussion fast enough.
Court adjourned. :denied: