I'm gonna call this guy's bluff and put him in the same category as Gus Searcy, someone who is seeking attention out of this matter.
It just does not make sense. If what he said in the video is true, that he lent her money for a trip to see Travis and that she was frantic, he most likely would have been called as a witness. JA's version was that she called Travis en route to SLC and Travis was compelling; his testimony would further bolster the PT's pile of evidence, including the rental car, gas cans, cell phone, etc.
For him to have been repaid, there would either have to be cancelled checks, sending cash through the mail, or trips to Big Sur from Yreka to pay him cash. Just does not sound plausible, IMHO.
Listen to his other stuff and it just comes off as bogus.