MA MA - Chelsea Jane Doe, BlkFem 17-25, UP14135, "Lisa from Philly”, Nov'00

[Aurora90]

If no one has, I would be more than happy to submit this as a potential match to be looked into..

 

[Anomalocarididae]

If no one has, I would be more than happy to submit this as a potential match to be looked into..

Please do!

 

[Lwieckowicz]

If no one has, I would be more than happy to submit this as a potential match to be looked into..

Following!

 

[Aurora90]

Suggestion sent!

 

[sorcoy14]

As of now she has no rule outs listed. I’ll keep an eye on it.

 

[John/Jane Doe]

@Caring1 Hey could you post the current list of NamUs exclusions for this Jane Doe? I would greatly appreciate it.

 

[DS2021]

@Caring1 Hey could you post the current list of NamUs exclusions for this Jane Doe? I would greatly appreciate it.

No rule outs

 

[beavt]

Toi Mitchell? Time frame matches, as do height/weight and a similar face to my eye. Can almost see the very slight overbite…

The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)

By bringing people, information, forensic science and technology together, NamUs helps resolve cases.

www.namus.gov

 

[Megsc]

Toi Mitchell? Time frame matches, as do height/weight and a similar face to my eye. Can almost see the very slight overbite…

The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)

By bringing people, information, forensic science and technology together, NamUs helps resolve cases.

www.namus.gov

Many similarities!
You should definitely submit this one

 

[walt91]

Toi's Charley page states that she had contact with a family member in early 2001, which means she couldn't be this Doe if that information is correct.

 

[DS2021]

Toi's Charley page states that she had contact with a family member in early 2001, which means she couldn't be this Doe if that information is correct.

Mitchell was last seen in St. Louis, Missouri on August 27, 2000, but the last time she had contact with anyone was six months later, on February 5, 2001. She has never been heard from again. Few details are available in her case, but investigators believe she isn't missing voluntarily.

 

[beavt]

I’m thinking DNA would better rule her out over a perhaps misremembered contact. Unless they physically saw her in 2001. Please clarify if family saw her in 2001.

 

[Kamiko123132]

I think this jane Doe could be on the younger side judging no the picture of her I wanna say 17-22 She looks like she would be around that age