MA MA - Holly Piirainen, 10, Sturbridge, 5 Aug 1993

This honestly could be nothing, but thought I’d post this here just in case. I was watching videos about Holly on YouTube and came across a strange comment.

Go to this video and then to the comments section:

The video was posted 3 years ago and the last comment was posted 2 years ago. The comment says:

‘93 water street. Check the camper. Original police sketch’

I have so many questions!

Why would someone post this? 93 Water street in what town? What police sketch are they referring to? I don’t think there is a police sketch for the suspect/killer that took Holly, so are they referring to the Bish police sketches?

Again this could be nothing, but it’s strange that someone posted this in the comments section on one of Holly’s videos.
 
This honestly could be nothing, but thought I’d post this here just in case. I was watching videos about Holly on YouTube and came across a strange comment.

Go to this video and then to the comments section:

The video was posted 3 years ago and the last comment was posted 2 years ago. The comment says:

‘93 water street. Check the camper. Original police sketch’

I have so many questions!

Why would someone post this? 93 Water street in what town? What police sketch are they referring to? I don’t think there is a police sketch for the suspect/killer that took Holly, so are they referring to the Bish police sketches?

Again this could be nothing, but it’s strange that someone posted this in the comments section on one of Holly’s videos.
It might be nothing but you should call this into the tip line. That YT comment looks like it was made by a Palmer resident who lives at that same address in Palmer. I don’t understand the comment either. But there is a camper at that address.
 
Could the new info be related to this case? speculation, imo. rbbm
Nov 13 2024
''SPRINGFIELD, Mass. (WWLP) – New information is expected on Wednesday on a cold case from decades ago.
The Hampden District Attorney’s Office says they will be holding a news conference at 11:30 a.m. about a significant development in a murder case that was never solved.''

Holly Piirainen​

220px-Holly_Piirainen-217x300.jpg

''In 1993, 10-year-old Holly Piirainen disappeared after taking a walk to see collie puppies near her grandmother’s Sturbridge summer home. Two and a half months later, On October 23, 1993, her remains were found in Brimfield by a hunter in the woods.

Those with information about this case please contact the State Police Detective Unit at 413-505-5946 or the State Police Unresolved Cases Unit at 1-855-MA-SOLVE (1-855-627-6583) or you can text the word Solve to 274637 from your cell phone.'
 
Could the new info be related to this case? speculation, imo. rbbm
Nov 13 2024
''SPRINGFIELD, Mass. (WWLP) – New information is expected on Wednesday on a cold case from decades ago.
The Hampden District Attorney’s Office says they will be holding a news conference at 11:30 a.m. about a significant development in a murder case that was never solved.''

Holly Piirainen​

220px-Holly_Piirainen-217x300.jpg

''In 1993, 10-year-old Holly Piirainen disappeared after taking a walk to see collie puppies near her grandmother’s Sturbridge summer home. Two and a half months later, On October 23, 1993, her remains were found in Brimfield by a hunter in the woods.

Those with information about this case please contact the State Police Detective Unit at 413-505-5946 or the State Police Unresolved Cases Unit at 1-855-MA-SOLVE (1-855-627-6583) or you can text the word Solve to 274637 from your cell phone.'

Just to close the loop, the announcement was about a different cold case, a rest area double murder in 1978 in West Springfield, MA.

Hoping that one day soon it will be Holly's turn.
 
Hello everyone. New here. But not new to this case. I remember it from day one since it was a pretty local case and have been following it ever since.

I just finished listening to Richard Price podcast on Holly.

He has worked closely with the family to produce the podcast. And it really helps bring Holly to life. Especially the interview with her 13 yr old cousin who had attended Camp Marshall in Spencer the week before her disappearance with Holly. I was at the horse camp there that same week. We were separate from regular camp Marshall for most of our activities, and where we slept, but we ate in the same dining hall, and the first night we all at outside picnic style, it was always chicken pucks aka chicken patties. Thursday night, the last night of camp was always the social which we also attended with camp Marshall and it always ended with American Pie and the whole camp dancing in a circle in the beginning and end to that song.

Listening to her cousin talk about her at camp, made Holly feel so alive. So animated. So full of personality. In a way the still image so ingrained in my head, never could.

Anyway Price talks about many suspects but in the end he comes around to believing the one responsible was the man spotted by two teenage girls in a brown/tan pick up truck on Allen Road. This man was interviewed by cops, admitted to being in the area, said he followed a cement truck to see if he could get a job wherever it was headed. He admitted to seeing Holly, and was even able to describe the Camp Marshall t-shirt she was wearing that day. It’s worth noting the shirt the media said she was wearing was a Barry Simpson t shirt. Not a camp Marshall t shirt. But this truck driver knew what she was wearing.

He narrows the abduction time to a max of a 9minute window. Based on when passerby’s had seen Holly, and then later saw the two brothers who had gone back for her.

His theory is she was taken directly to Five Bridge Road, which would have been about 20 minutes. Declothed, assaulted, and murdered her and left. This man which he will not name, is from Brimfield and lived with his mother who worked at the public house in Sturbridge. It’s believed he went home, cleaned up, and headed back out to look for work. At 2pm he was pulled over by a cop, because his truck matched one seen at the scene of the abduction. But when they ran his license it was good and they couldn’t hold him (turns out this was a glitch and his license was actually suspended.)

So if we run with all this one thing I keep coming back to was how would the abduction actually gone down. Would he have pulled into south shore road, with her on his drivers side? Did he then back out and reverse and take off with her down Allen? How would he have been able to grab a 10 yr old and keep her out of sight and in control as he drove? Could he have sedated her? With what? If so was he prawling?

It was summer. So conceivably windows were open. Back then I doubt too many of those old homes would have had AC. Heck my parents still don’t. If she screamed I think someone would have heard.

This is one part I still feel confused by. How did he get her in the car, and drive those 20 minutes? Could he have had a weapon?
Could he have put her in a his truck bed?

Any thoughts?
 
She was 10, no weapon was necessary. I was little then, but I remember seeing her missing poster at a fair (might have been the Spencer one). I still remember coming home from my aunts house months later, and learning her body had been found.

I just don’t think we’ll ever have a definitive answer here, but I am confident her killer is dead or in prison. That’s almost always the case with cases with these elements.
 
She was 10, no weapon was necessary. I was little then, but I remember seeing her missing poster at a fair (might have been the Spencer one). I still remember coming home from my aunts house months later, and learning her body had been found.

I just don’t think we’ll ever have a definitive answer here, but I am confident her killer is dead or in prison. That’s almost always the case with cases with these elements.
He may be but if that were the case I think it would have been solved by now. Because if they were in prison likely there would be chatter in prison about it.

No he wouldn’t have needed a weapon. But still how would he have gotten her in and kept her out of sight while driving? Any thoughts on that. As that is what I’m pondering. Would he have been holding her down with one hand while driving with the other. I’m just trying to picture the logistics of doing this.
 
He may be but if that were the case I think it would have been solved by now. Because if they were in prison likely there would be chatter in prison about it.

No he wouldn’t have needed a weapon. But still how would he have gotten her in and kept her out of sight while driving? Any thoughts on that. As that is what I’m pondering. Would he have been holding her down with one hand while driving with the other. I’m just trying to picture the logistics of doing this.
He wouldn’t have to hold her down. I’ve followed and read about lots of cases like this, and nothing like that is necessary. They’re too scared to make a fuss, and if anyone sees the victim there are no red flags.

I mean, how often do you notice passengers in a car when you’re out driving?

Prison doesn’t mean chatter. Plenty of killers convicted of crimes are found to be responsible for others after their dead, via DNA.
 
He wouldn’t have to hold her down. I’ve followed and read about lots of cases like this, and nothing like that is necessary. They’re too scared to make a fuss, and if anyone sees the victim there are no red flags.

I mean, how often do you notice passengers in a car when you’re out driving?

Prison doesn’t mean chatter. Plenty of killers convicted of crimes are found to be responsible for others after their dead, via DNA.
What do you make of the guy in the tan/brown truck being the only one who identified the T-shirt she was wearing?

If she was facing the fence waiting for puppies. And he’s out looking for jobs, how does he notice the details of a kids shirt on the side of the road with her back facing him?

This man btw is not in prison.
 
What do you make of the guy in the tan/brown truck being the only one who identified the T-shirt she was wearing?

If she was facing the fence waiting for puppies. And he’s out looking for jobs, how does he notice the details of a kids shirt on the side of the road with her back facing him?

This man btw is not in prison.
I just don’t trust witness statements in general. This case would be solved within weeks if it was now, but there’s just nothing at this point.

They could have a confession and we’d still never know.

I hate it.
 
I just don’t trust witness statements in general. This case would be solved within weeks if it was now, but there’s just nothing at this point.

They could have a confession and we’d still never know.

I hate it.
I’m sorry but I don’t follow. The man in the truck was interviewed and described the T-shirt she was wearing accurately. What exactly do you mean when you say you don’t believe witness statements?

What witnesses are you not believing here?
 
Came across this article from this past summer. It’s by the same guy that made the multiple episode podcast on the case, Richard Price.

There is an angle in it I hadn’t seen before.

From the article:

Jackman said investigators reported to her that this man vaguely identified a detail on Holly's T-shirt from that day. Yet Jackman still had doubts.

"It’s complex," she said. After the Telegram & Gazette published a story on my reporting, a woman emailed me that the investigator’s timeline was erroneous. I was the 15-year-old, she wrote.

We spoke on the phone. The woman was credible. Her memory says she walked alone to the mailbox that day. She was creeped out by the driver staring but not fearful of being grabbed. She flipped through mugshots in 1993 and again about seven years ago, picking the same person twice, she said.

What is his name?" I asked.

At first, she struggled to remember.

Eventually, I said the name of the Man in the Pickup Truck.

“No, that’s not who I picked.”

My heart sank. I glanced at a file of another man, never mentioned in the press, with a long record but little info on his whereabouts that day.

She uttered his first name. I offered a last name.

"Yup, him," she said.

Soon we hung up with a plan to meet.

But she canceled because, she told me, the lead investigator asked her to.

Full article.
 
Full article.
IMO this is not a good article. Half the article seems to be fluff based on the thesis stated: "How can society improve the unsolved murder rate?". The other section is the long quote from the article, which I snipped for this post, with vague information about the man in the brown truck and the girl walking to her mailbox witness.

" The reasons for the decline are multifaceted, but the pain families like Holly’s feel while they wait for justice is intense. Before the establishment of Miranda rights, police departments faced less oversight, resulting in more individuals imprisoned for crimes they may not have committed. It also empowered law enforcement to submit inaccurate data to the FBI, according to Jeff Asher, a crime data expert with Datalytics."

Miranda rights were established in 1966. Well before 1993.

He goes on to talk about solved and unsolved homicide rates from 1990s to 2010s and the increase of homicides by firearms. The states that Holly's case is not likely a firearms case. There are some ways listed to increase the solved homicide rate; two being supporting Violent Incident Clearance and Technological Investigative Methods Act, or VICTIM. The other being supporting increased reporting about cases.

However, is Holly's case complicated, or is Holly's case stymied by the rural location, the decomp related to how long it took to find her body, and just an overall lack of physical or witness evidence. I don't see how the VICTIM bill would necessary help, and there was substantial reporting of Holly's case at the time.
 
IMO this is not a good article. Half the article seems to be fluff based on the thesis stated: "How can society improve the unsolved murder rate?". The other section is the long quote from the article, which I snipped for this post, with vague information about the man in the brown truck and the girl walking to her mailbox witness.

" The reasons for the decline are multifaceted, but the pain families like Holly’s feel while they wait for justice is intense. Before the establishment of Miranda rights, police departments faced less oversight, resulting in more individuals imprisoned for crimes they may not have committed. It also empowered law enforcement to submit inaccurate data to the FBI, according to Jeff Asher, a crime data expert with Datalytics."

Miranda rights were established in 1966. Well before 1993.

He goes on to talk about solved and unsolved homicide rates from 1990s to 2010s and the increase of homicides by firearms. The states that Holly's case is not likely a firearms case. There are some ways listed to increase the solved homicide rate; two being supporting Violent Incident Clearance and Technological Investigative Methods Act, or VICTIM. The other being supporting increased reporting about cases.

However, is Holly's case complicated, or is Holly's case stymied by the rural location, the decomp related to how long it took to find her body, and just an overall lack of physical or witness evidence. I don't see how the VICTIM bill would necessary help, and there was substantial reporting of Holly's case at the time.
I don’t think the point of sharing this article was for its overall arc or quality. But for the part about where the witness contacted him and corrected some errors and the fact she was asked I identity a man when it happened and again 7 yrs ago.

Out of curiosity have you listened to the journalist who wrote this articles multi year podcast specific to this case?
 
Remember, many cases, are often very close to being solved, there is just something inhibiting LE from proceeding with a certain suspect for some reason , they usually have the name of the individual responsible within a week or so of the investigation
 
Ill add a few things to consider.

In the majority of abduction sexual murders of children, (Victim under 18 years of age) the offender is in the area for some legitimate reason, they either live or work nearby, or its a route they may travel often in daily congress, therefore they often do not seem out of place.

The offender is stranger to the victim only slightly more (53%) than someone they know or are acquainted with.

The motive in these types of cases are almost 100% sexual.

Stereotypical stranger abductions with a sexual component are usually impulse driven, and not planned, in other words they are not out trolling for a victim, they have been harbouring deviant sexual urges for some time, and the victim just so happens to cross their path. The offender then acts impulsively and will often physically grab their victim, the use of a ruse or con is used less often in stereotypical child abduction murders.

Unlike murders of adults, there usually isn't any precipitating stressors, or triggering events prior to the incident in question.

Because they act impulsively they are often in a state of fray following the abduction itself, the victim is killed not because they want to murder a child but to avoid being identified, its important to note however that this may change over time and these individuals of all criminal types have the most chance of becoming serial killers. The manner of death in the overwhelming number of cases, is strangulation, usually manual but ligature is a very close second.

One thing I feel is important to note is these types tend to be more sociopath than psychopath, therefore there have been cases, where a child victim was selected simply because the killer was not able to abduct an adult victim, and they act out of frustration when they select a smaller more controllable victim, or simply one that was alone. (On February 1 2004 11 yo Carlie Bruscia was abducted and murdered by Joseph Smith in Sarasota Florida, Smith had failed to abduct 2 women in the weeks prior to Bruscia's murder, one victim physically fought Smith off)

Just as with familiarity where the abduction occurs, even more so is the killers familiarity with the body recovery site , due to the fear and anxiety following the abduction itself the killer will often take the victim immediately somewhere they feel safe, and will be undisturbed. In these cases, the body recovery site and the site where the victim was killed are often one and the same if not they are usually within 200 feet of each other.

(its important to note however that very often the assault and murder of the victim happen inside the offenders vehicle, but the spatial relationship remains consistent)

One stunning fact is that the killer will return to the victims body about 85% of the time, usually within the first 24 to 48 hours after they have deposited the victim there, and will often do so in regular intervals until a certain state of decomposition or the body is discovered. The victims body is more often hidden than displayed . This provides a very good opportunity to possibly identify a suspect if police can find any witnesses to anyone in and around that area from the date of abduction till the victims remains were discovered.

The victim is usually killed within 30-45 minutes following the abduction , sadly most of these victims aren't noticed to be missing until 2 hours after they have been abducted , which presents a very heart wrenching fact, most often in these cases the victim is killed before their parents even notice they are missing. this is why time is of utter importance in these cases.

(More than half of these cases, are simply reported to law enforcement simply as a "missing child" , which demonstrates the importance of a swift response by agencies involved)

A vehicle is used in approximately 97% of abduction murders of children, and when the police do not know the initial contact site the solvability of these cases drop approx 40% below average.

Also interesting to note is that in the majority of these cases, the killers name becomes known to law enforcement with the first 7 days of the investigation, therefore when addressing "cold" homicide cases investigators should re-interview anyone whos name was included in the original findings.

The Victim:

In the overwhelming majority of these cases, the victim is a White Female (74%) between 9-13 years old,with 11 being the most common age at time of their abduction and subsequent killing,black females were targeted much less (14%) other races were much lower.

The victim is not targeted for any other physical feature other than being the preferred gender for the offender and that there is no adult presence with the victim at the time.


The victim is usually abducted within .4 miles from their home, only 33% are abducted withing 200 feet of their home , and is often transported greater than 2 miles away by the offender.

The victims are usually described as "normal" kids with nothing in their personal life that would increase their chances of being a victim, only (16%) are usually involved in some type of high risk lifestyle, however the victims that did live a lifestyle that may make then a victim tended to be in their teens , therefore in most of these types of crime becoming a victim is largely based on chance.


The offender:

These offenses are almost always committed by males close to 99%

The offender is usually between the ages of 26-36, with a mean age of 27.8 at the time of of the offense, this can vary however depending on whether or not the individual has served time or was away for military service, in treatment or something else where they were supervised and may not have had access to a victim.

The majority are under no official supervised status (probation/parole) at the time of offense

Race plays in interesting role in these types of offenses, as the overwhelming majority of these cases the offender is white and usually selects victims of their own race, Only (19%) were black , however in the case of minority offenders, (Black, Hispanic, Asian) the offenders tend to mix victim preference more and tend to cross lines of much more readily, statistically this factor holds true throughout the entire spectrum of sexual offenses.

(Serial Killers of adults may have a lesser defined victim type depending on their ability to procure a victim, killers of prostitutes tend to be more socially inept, and therefore will kill victims simply because they are able to get them under their control, therefore racial lines in certain serial murder cases, may be crossed, however again it usually has more to do with accessibility)

They usually live alone or with parents or a parental figure,the later end of the age range 30+ may be married or in some kind of relationship or agreement.

Most will have a history off frequent changes of residence with the majority having relocated to the area where the abduction occurs just within 12 to 16 months prior.

These types have been described ad "Social Marginals" often known as "odd" to those around them, they often have few friends or peer groups other than possibly on line (in modern times)

Almost all have some type of criminal history , often it reflects some type of deviant behavior that has been identified as early as adolescence, more than half will have some type of criminal history involving children .

They most often work in some facet of the construction industry usually unskilled or semi skilled labor with periodic work history.

The use of various sexual materials with these types is extremely high as one may surmise, these most often focus on whatever age and gender preference they have, and they go to great lengths to hide whatever objects that may identify their predilection to others, also because much of it is illegal. Its important to note however that not all of these materials may ba sexually explicit, as they may be pictures the offender has taken himself or collected from magazines , many of these killers have ben caught with collections of pictures of children the clipped from newspapers , magazines, circular ads etc, but they usually have large volumes of such and the collection of such materials alone is telling.
(Investigative consideration: These individuals have a very high propensity to be involved in the on line trading of child sexual materials and are often identified through "stings" therefore a thorough investigation of any individual arrested for such should be considered, as it may identify a potential suspect in unsolved cases)

Because these types are often isolated from normal peer groups to begin with, post offensive behavior , though usually very noticeable often goes unreported . However Post offense behavior (POB) is often noticed by those around the offender.

Post offense we often see increases in drug alcohol and tobacco use, they may gain or lose weight, they may suddenly have an interest in religion, they often alter their appearance, such as cutting hair or shaving facial hair, or the opposite. they may have tattoos covered or altered, They will usually appear suddenly anxious and tend to isolate more, They may alter, sell or destroy things they may carry on a daily basis such as a knife , jewelry or clothes they were wearing the day of the murder, or their vehicle especially if it matches any eyewitness accounts.

The offender may even confide in someone about the murder, often confirming their involvement but denying intent. "It was sex that got out of hand", "I hit her with the car and panicked" etc

Those who are around the victim may report items that seem out of place being found in the offenders possession, such as childrens clothing, or other items the victim may have had on their person

The 2 most readily identifiable POB's are a sudden overwhelming intense interest in the case, that seems to appear out of nowhere, in the past they would collect newspaper clippings, now they may print out articles on line, save everything they can find, all media devices should be scrutinized such as computers, , cell phones, detachable storage devices, they will attend police briefings, their browser history will often reflect numerous searches on the case, in which the killer may offer to help with the investigation, the second is a sudden unexplained move from the area, however its interesting to note that child killers that go unidentified may eventually return to an area where they have offended in the past after a period of time, because they still have family there.

Its well known that sex offenders of all types have a propensity much higher than other criminal types to re-offend, however these types have the highest propensity of all to become serial offenders.

Now Unlike serial predators who primarily prey on adults, serial murder of children the MO usually doesn't change much (if at all) throughout the offenders career. In cases of sadistic type killers however this may change with trial and error.

Ill refrain from writhing the entire book out on Child murderers, but Holly's case tends to fit the above .
 
I don’t think the point of sharing this article was for its overall arc or quality. But for the part about where the witness contacted him and corrected some errors and the fact she was asked I identity a man when it happened and again 7 yrs ago.

Out of curiosity have you listened to the journalist who wrote this articles multi year podcast specific to this case?
The quality speaks to the believably or trustworthiness of the writer.

I tend to steer away from podcasts, Tiktok, Youtube true crimers, and sensationalistic true crime writers. I will make exceptions. I am not seeing a extensive body of journalistic reports from this Richard Price. I am mainly seeing one guest column in the Worcester Telegram & Gazette.
 
He wouldn’t have to hold her down. I’ve followed and read about lots of cases like this, and nothing like that is necessary. They’re too scared to make a fuss, and if anyone sees the victim there are no red flags.

I mean, how often do you notice passengers in a car when you’re out driving?

Prison doesn’t mean chatter. Plenty of killers convicted of crimes are found to be responsible for others after their dead, via DNA.
To add to the last line.. people admit to killing adults all the time, but when it comes to the kids, nobody wants to ever admit they are that evil, especially in prison! (They don't take kindly to child killers, even there)
 
The intersection of South Shore and Allen was in my opinion intentionally chosen to relate to the South Shore Line train wreck (7 dead) of January 18, 1993, (MLK day) in Gary Indiana. According to a Northwest Indiana Times Article, the 10-year-old boy killed in the wreck, traveling to Chicago from South Bend, was taken to the Guy and Allen funeral home in Gary. Two days before James Earl Ray escaped from a Jefferson City prison in 1967, allowing him to eventually assassinate MLK almost a year later, there was another wreck on that line in South Bend, near the end of the line near the old LaSalle Hotel the same day as the Belvidere/Oak Lawn tornado. (The Lasalle hotel in South Bend is homonymous with the infamous La Salle Hotel in Chicago, which suffered a disastrous fire (61 dead, many of them children) at 12:15 am, June 5, 1946, corresponding in local time to when RFK would be shot 22 years later.) What is especially weird about it is that one week earlier in 1967 there was another wreck (on April 14, 55th anniversary Titanic hitting iceberg, responsible for the Titanic trail that Piirainen's remains were found near being called the Titanic trail) on the South Shore Line that ended at pretty much the exact same spot for the same reason (brake failure). I'm guessing that superstitious Ray thought the alignment of the Belvidere/Oak Lawn tornado and the non-fatal wrecks in South Bend across from the LaSalle Hotel were a sign from disaster spirits or whatever that he should try to escape forthwith. According to a June 2017 article in the South Bend Tribune, it was Mayor Allen of South Bend (the last Republican Mayor of that city), who as a result of the 1967 accidents decided to get the South Shore Line to end street running through South Bend by having the line end on the west side of town. August 5 probably relates to the Tipton Ford, MO, railroad wreck (43 dead) of August 5, 1914, the day (Berlin time) Britain formally started its war against Germany in WWI (it started at midnight, Berlin time, which was 11pm, August 4, London time). In 1922, eight years to the day after this wreck, there was another horrific Missouri train wreck in Sulphur Springs that killed 34. Tipton Ford reminds me of Tipton Air Base, which was located on the South Shore Line of the former WB&A railroad in Maryland, and which was where Robert Preston flew the helicopter from that landed on the White House grounds on February 17, 1974, the day Carla Walker was snatched in Fort Worth to be murdered and the anniversary of the 1950 Rockville Centre wreck, the other well-known train wreck that occurred on a partially overlapping "gantlet" track (like the 1993 South Shore line wreck on the bridge in Gary). Possibly, though it's not nearly as clear, Five Bridges Road may be a reference to Bridge No. 5, where the Southern Pacific's City of San Francisco wrecked on August 12, 1939, east of Harney, Nevada, in what is officially at any rate the deadliest ever railway sabotage in the history of the United States.

The Truesdell bridge disaster happened the day before Leon Czolgosz was born opposite where Reagan lived in Dixon when he went to Dixon High (the bridge was very close to where Dixon High is now, but that's not where Dixon High was when Reagan went there). As a lifeguard on Lowell Beach on the Rock River, Reagan saved 77 people, who I suppose if left to drown may have floated down to where the bridge used to be. I'm pretty sure the bridge was built from iron work created in a factory in Belvidere, Illinois. The design of the (dangerously ineffective) "Truesdell truss" bridge design employed in Dixon was created by Lucius Truesdell when he lived in Warren, Massachusetts. Of course, Warren is where Molly Bish vanished from on June 27, 2000, when she was a lifeguard. She vanished on the anniversary of the South Bend train wreck of 1859 (at least 42 dead), sometimes also called the Great Mishawaka train wreck since it actually happened between South Bend, Indiana, and Mishawaka, Indiana. Notice how the "Mish" in Mishawaka rhymes with "Bish".

May 5, 1973, on what would be Leon Czolgosz's 100th birthday (thus, one day after the centennial of the Truesdell bridge disaster in Dixon), Donna Maria Boudreau was murdered in Fitchburg, Massachusetts, where the Iver-Johnson revolver that Czolgosz used to assassinate President McKinley was presumably made. There's a findagrave page for Lincoln conspirator Mary Elizabeth Jenkins Surratt that indicates she was born May 4, 1823, which would be 50 years to the day before the Truesdell bridge disaster, but more common opinion on internet is that it is unknown when she was born in May/June 1823.

A few years ago I called about these things to the Holly hotline, but they weren't patient enough to let me tell them about most of the clues and how they relate to one another. Oral presentation isn't best approach. The ideal thing is to send several hundred page treatise full of similar coincidences in hundreds of murders and assassinations, but there is no place in law enforcement that advertises to want such. You can't evaluate complex theory presented orally otherwise than sequentially, while books can be flipped through, allowing one to see quickly with high degree of probability that likely almost whole book is indeed remarkably full of same sort of coincidences repeated over and over, which thus obviously would signal an actual pattern. The Piirainen/Bish case is highly interesting as being at the tail-end of the murders of young females that I have noticed which have creepy coincidences with disasters. They seemed to peak in 1970s and early 80s. Maryland and Massachusetts seem to have had the most cases like that. But mass murders nowadays often have similar references to disasters, I have observed.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
150
Guests online
648
Total visitors
798

Forum statistics

Threads
625,663
Messages
18,507,846
Members
240,832
Latest member
bibthebab
Back
Top