- Joined
- Jul 15, 2016
- Messages
- 271
- Reaction score
- 1,818
I have never hear about the girdle or the magazines!!! Wow!! I still believe this is a solvable case. Let's brainstorm.
I have never hear about the girdle or the magazines!!! Wow!! I still believe this is a solvable case. Let's brainstorm.
I've read the articles and I've reviewed the crime scene photos of the kitchen.
I'm now convinced JR knew the person who was in her house that day, and on other days. I believe JR and the person had met on several occasions and had 'enjoyed each other's company' (implication intended) during those several occasions and not necessarily in the R house. Perhaps the encounters were a result of MR having been gone on too many occasions for days at a time. An old flame, or a then-more-recent acquaintance or a distant 'friend' from college or from her family's old neighborhood.
I'm thinking JR may have been feeling guilty and attempted to end it and the person became angry. When the situation became overwhelming and argumentative JR threatened / attempted to call police and the situation escalated from that point forward.
Attempts to clean up the kitchen were abandoned when the person frightened JR to the point where, in order to protect her children and to keep neighbors from finding out, she agreed to go with the person, as usual.
JR must have been very distraught, crying from her injury. They eventually stopped at a motel, only JR entered the office and signed for the room. JR and the person then entered the motel room and....
One hour later, they placed $5 on the bed and left in the person's vehicle. As they traveled JR became hysterical as she thought of her children and the bloodied kitchen, the damaged phone and the furniture strewn about. She realized she could never explain what happened without giving up the secret. Either JR convinced the person to stop and let her out of the vehicle or the person forced her to get out.
By that point JR would have been an emotional mess, maybe reached a point of breakdown, knowing she could not face her children and husband. She wandered aimlessly for some time in complete despair, until finally ending up deep in the woods or in deep water.
Yeah, I read that part about a year ago, the last time I checked on this case. Apparently LE didn't think it was relevant at the time. Maybe they found an explanation for it, but IDK. Can't hurt to revisit it.
Let's say its a stalker who surprised her at home. Did he enter the house and wound her in some way? Stab her in the hand or arm? It would explain her neighbor's account that she came out of the house holding something red - could have been her hand. She would have tried to call police, prompting him to stab her while she was in the kitchen near the phone. There are blood tracks upstairs, in the baby's room, in the bedroom. Was she trying to get the baby and escape?
Could he have taken her out the back way? She tried to run out the front, but returned because her son was still in the house.
bbm
There was no backdoor on the house, except for a below-grade-basement exit door ("Dorothy Doors").
I dont think so,light switchs are placed at 48"The phone dial in Joans kitchen would be eye level for average adults.Lillian would need a kitchen chair to reach the dial,all Joans kitchen table chairs seem to be neat and orderly.My thoughts determined by crime photos.Good point. The phone would have been mounted approximately 48-50 inches from the floor to the bottom of the phone proper, placing the dial height at approximately 54-56 inches; it seems reasonable to assume a 4 year old could reach it, and would be a likely person to attempt to dial and not realize/understand the handset was not attached.
But there is a back door on the garage which gets you to the breezeway door next to the garage and house.bbm
There was no backdoor on the house, except for a below-grade-basement exit door ("Dorothy Doors").
Could the little girl have broken the phone while trying to get to it to use it? As in pulling on the handset in desperation?I dont think so,light switchs are placed at 48"The phone dial in Joans kitchen would be eye level for average adults.Lillian would need a kitchen chair to reach the dial,all Joans kitchen table chairs seem to be neat and orderly.My thoughts determined by crime photos.
I dont think so,light switchs are placed at 48"The phone dial in Joans kitchen would be eye level for average adults.Lillian would need a kitchen chair to reach the dial,all Joans kitchen table chairs seem to be neat and orderly.My thoughts determined by crime photos.
Could the little girl have broken the phone while trying to get to it to use it? As in pulling on the handset in desperation?
But there is a back door on the garage which gets you to the breezeway door next to the garage and house.
Note there was not enough open space next (left side, right side) to JR's vehicle for another vehicle to have been parked next to it. Behind it and in front of it, yes. Next to it, no.
I'm wondering how a 4 year old could have attempted to dial the phone and be so careful so as not to step in or touch / lean against *any* of the blood since there was a pooling of blood extending from the corner on the floor under the phone and a smear on the wall under the phone approximately 20-22 inches above the floor.
Forcefully detaching a handset cord from a phone (especially phones of that era) would be difficult even for an adult.
The phone in the R kitchen appears to be an Western Electric Model 554 (A/B). 500-series phones were virtually indestructible, designed to last decades in-use, built so because the phones were owned by Western Electric and leased to consumers.
Typical handset cord construction included a coiled thermoplastic cord containing four (1960 models) individual leads of insulated stranded copper wire which were interlaced with cloth thread to maintain bend-radius and stretch integrity.
One end of the cord was hardwired (modular connector models were introduced 1968+) internally to the base phone and had a metal retaining ring crimped on it. The retaining ring was either attached to the base plate with a hook design or simply restrained by a metal tang attached to the top phone casing.
That cord was designed to survive much abuse and to last.. and required significant pull force to detach it from the phone base. That would be difficult for a 4 year old, although not impossible. I expect LR would have had to almost pull-hang from the cord to detach it and that likely would have resulted in her falling on to the floor and landing in the corner-located blood pool.
We had a 1957 wall mount phone like Joans while living in Lincoln.Our cord took lots of abuse and I cant ever remember it disconecting from the phone base or receiver.Joans phone cord separated at the phone base so maybe Lillian could have pulled on it, if she could reach it,but it would take great force to disconect it,but unlikey since she knew you had to use the dial and have access to it for a call.Could the little girl have broken the phone while trying to get to it to use it? As in pulling on the handset in desperation?
The children said Joan was in and out of garage getting and returning landscape tools.The back door led in to the garage proper but you could not then gain immediate access to the breezeway door from inside the garage unless a garage (vehicle access) door was opened. You had to exit the garage to access the breezeway door.
Both garage (vehicle access) doors show as open in crime scene photographs but it is not known if either or both doors were opened when the event occurred of if LE opened the doors during the investigation.
ChuckMaureen,I dont think we can ascertain from the photo that there isnt a door in the right front of the garage leading to the breezeway.It would make great design sense so you didnt have walk into bad weather to get into the house.The back door led in to the garage proper but you could not then gain immediate access to the breezeway door from inside the garage unless a garage (vehicle access) door was opened. You had to exit the garage to access the breezeway door.
Both garage (vehicle access) doors show as open in crime scene photographs but it is not known if either or both doors were opened when the event occurred of if LE opened the doors during the investigation.
A back door for a house makes good design sense as well but, there is no back door.
There is no door from the garage to the breezeway entrance.
Another view:
A back door for a house makes good design sense as well but, there is no back door.
There is no door from the garage to the breezeway entrance.
Another view:
I got my mag. glass on the photo and noticed something hanging on the wall in the right front corner of the garage door wall,but the photo angle could be deceptive,but your likely right.ChuckMaureen,I dont think we can ascertain from the photo that there isnt a door in the right front of the garage leading to the breezeway.It would make great design sense so you didnt have walk into bad weather to get into the house.