- Joined
- Feb 27, 2005
- Messages
- 3,864
- Reaction score
- 13,254
I'm wondering...
... did LE save blood evidence for this case? If so, will they order DNA testing? I'm guessing we'll never see that happen because LE has an idea the blood evidence belongs to only one individual: JR.
The amount of spatter on the walls and woodwork both in and outside of the kitchen is interesting; it's a wide dispersion pattern but most spots appear not to be trailed, as would be typical for cast-off. Most droplets appear to be straight-on spotting. Odd. Maybe that indicates the strikes were not of extreme force. That would explain the little to no trailed cast-off spotting and might also explain the seeming low-severity of the inflicted wound(s)... and, might suggest the physical stature of the attacker: maybe a younger male, a teen, not a stronger man?
If there was someone else other than JR and family in the house that day (fingerprint evidence supports the argument) it is possible that someone might also have had Type O. I'm not suggesting the someone is the source of all the blood but that it is possible JR got in a few licks of her own and drew blood from her attacker. A mixture of blood would not be unusual at a bloody crime scene.
If blood evidence contained a mixture of same-type blood would analysis at that time be able to ascertain that and if so, would such a result be a logical reason for LE to not release the analysis report? LE stated they believed an unknown was in the house that day so hiding the possibility of finding a mixture of blood would not make sense as reason to not release the blood analysis report.
If analysis determined the blood was Type O and blood from only one individual (JR) was found at the general scene then what could be cause for LE to not release that information? What is in that report? Would there be any reason to not release that information at this point? Maybe. The Risch children, now adults, are still alive.
Going back to evidence found in the kitchen:
One discarded, assumed-empty bottle of Ezra Brooks Old Crow Sour Mash Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey 90 Proof (a Jack Daniels copycat) liquor. Confirmed by MR that he and JR had consumed from the bottle (unknown if it was full or partial) the evening previous to the day of JR's disappearance.
Articles that referenced "beer can"(s) are varied. One indicated MR was unable to explain the source of the beer, another indicate MR confirmed they had purchased beer but did not consume it on the day or days previous to the day of JR's disappearance. One can of Miller is shown in the waste basket, just under the Franco-American Spaghetti with Beef can. A crumpled Miller High Life small-pack cardboard carrier carton is shown on the kitchen floor next to the waste basket.
Did LE request for an alcohol content test of blood evidence? If so, what was the determination? Would such a test be useless given the circumstances?
Regarding the apparent "attempt at cleanup" of the kitchen floor, was it LR or JR or BB or ??
The large roll of paper towel shown on the kitchen floor is not taken from the roll dispenser mounted on the wall above the covered toaster on the counter next to the sink. A nearly-empty paper towel roll is shown still on the dispenser so the large roll was either pulled from a cabinet or a counter top. I expect it was stored in a cabinet, given the visual 'neatness' of counter tops and shelving shown in the kitchen.
It seems whomever did the cleanup determined the paper towels were not effective to their satisfaction so they grabbed DR's clothing and used that.
Whom? This seems to be a logical assumption:
The attacker did the "cleanup"... to wipe away footprints. That would explain two mysteries in this case.
... did LE save blood evidence for this case? If so, will they order DNA testing? I'm guessing we'll never see that happen because LE has an idea the blood evidence belongs to only one individual: JR.
The amount of spatter on the walls and woodwork both in and outside of the kitchen is interesting; it's a wide dispersion pattern but most spots appear not to be trailed, as would be typical for cast-off. Most droplets appear to be straight-on spotting. Odd. Maybe that indicates the strikes were not of extreme force. That would explain the little to no trailed cast-off spotting and might also explain the seeming low-severity of the inflicted wound(s)... and, might suggest the physical stature of the attacker: maybe a younger male, a teen, not a stronger man?
If there was someone else other than JR and family in the house that day (fingerprint evidence supports the argument) it is possible that someone might also have had Type O. I'm not suggesting the someone is the source of all the blood but that it is possible JR got in a few licks of her own and drew blood from her attacker. A mixture of blood would not be unusual at a bloody crime scene.
If blood evidence contained a mixture of same-type blood would analysis at that time be able to ascertain that and if so, would such a result be a logical reason for LE to not release the analysis report? LE stated they believed an unknown was in the house that day so hiding the possibility of finding a mixture of blood would not make sense as reason to not release the blood analysis report.
If analysis determined the blood was Type O and blood from only one individual (JR) was found at the general scene then what could be cause for LE to not release that information? What is in that report? Would there be any reason to not release that information at this point? Maybe. The Risch children, now adults, are still alive.
Going back to evidence found in the kitchen:
One discarded, assumed-empty bottle of Ezra Brooks Old Crow Sour Mash Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey 90 Proof (a Jack Daniels copycat) liquor. Confirmed by MR that he and JR had consumed from the bottle (unknown if it was full or partial) the evening previous to the day of JR's disappearance.
Articles that referenced "beer can"(s) are varied. One indicated MR was unable to explain the source of the beer, another indicate MR confirmed they had purchased beer but did not consume it on the day or days previous to the day of JR's disappearance. One can of Miller is shown in the waste basket, just under the Franco-American Spaghetti with Beef can. A crumpled Miller High Life small-pack cardboard carrier carton is shown on the kitchen floor next to the waste basket.
Did LE request for an alcohol content test of blood evidence? If so, what was the determination? Would such a test be useless given the circumstances?
Regarding the apparent "attempt at cleanup" of the kitchen floor, was it LR or JR or BB or ??
The large roll of paper towel shown on the kitchen floor is not taken from the roll dispenser mounted on the wall above the covered toaster on the counter next to the sink. A nearly-empty paper towel roll is shown still on the dispenser so the large roll was either pulled from a cabinet or a counter top. I expect it was stored in a cabinet, given the visual 'neatness' of counter tops and shelving shown in the kitchen.
It seems whomever did the cleanup determined the paper towels were not effective to their satisfaction so they grabbed DR's clothing and used that.
Whom? This seems to be a logical assumption:
The attacker did the "cleanup"... to wipe away footprints. That would explain two mysteries in this case.