MA - Justice for Officer John O’Keefe * NO DISCUSSION * media, timelines, docs * NO DISCUSSION *

  • #501
@JulieCourtTV


A sweet reminder of who the victim is - Officer John O’Keefe!

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #502
  • #503
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #504
@BienickWCVB


#KarenRead The jury will consider more than 200 pieces of evidence, everything from taillight fragments to the clothing John O’Keefe was wearing

1750171811838.webp

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #505
6/17/2025 9:16:04
The judge tells defense attorney David Yannetti she did not notice he was missing when they started the proceedings. He says he was held up downstairs as they jury was arriving.

6/17/2025
 
  • #506
@KristinaRex


NEW: Jury has a question and will be coming back to court soon to ask it -- this happens by giving a note to the judge that all lawyers get to read too. Stay tuned.


10:44 AM · Jun 17, 2025
 
  • #507
  • #508

1750251684349.webp
 
  • #509
  • #510

Dedham Déjà Vu: Karen Read Jury Confused Over Verdict Form​

On the third day of deliberations, the jury in Karen Read's murder retrial signaled that they were confused by the verdict form in the case. Plus, a look at the civil case Read faces in connection with John O'Keefe's death. (6/18/25) MORE
 
  • #511
Here's the new, amended verdict slip on Count 2 that the jury will use after yesterday's question. Below is a thread explaining each slip, what the charges mean, and the possible outcomes.

View attachment 596138

View attachment 596139


Karen Read faces three indictments for the jury to decide on:
1. 2nd degree murder
2. Manslaughter while OUI
3. Leaving the scene of an accident causing death


Slips 1 & 3 (murder & leaving the scene) only have 1 choice: guilty or not guilty.
So we will move on to discussing Slip 2.


Slip 2: Read is charged with Manslaughter while OUI. That is the ONLY indictment she is facing. Adam Lally told the judge last week that prosecutors requested only this charge, and that the defense requested what's known as "lesser included" charges on the slip.


UNDER the Manslaughter OUI charge, jurors COULD choose to INSTEAD (not in addition to) convict Read of Involuntary Manslaughter OR Motor Vehicle Homicide OR Operating Under the Influence (OUI). These all carry lesser penalties than manslaughter.

View attachment 596140View attachment 596141


Jurors can only pick ONE option on this form. There are slight differences between the top few charges, related to "mental state." The allegations range -- was Read RECKLESS/WANTON *or* NEGLIGENT in her driving? Those are questions jury must consider.

View attachment 596142

View attachment 596143

Here's where it gets interesting. If the jury is deadlocked/hung on ANY CHARGE on this form... and that deadlock leads to a mistrial (big "if" - this is hypothetical)... Read can be retried for Manslaughter while OUI.


View attachment 596144
View attachment 596145

The means even if the jury is deadlocked over OUI, for example... and a mistrial occurs, the Commonwealth COULD retry Read for Manslaughter. Why? Because she has been indicted for manslaughter, and no resolution would have been reached by the jury on that charge.

@KristinaRex
 
  • #512
@ryanjbreslin


The O’Keefe family enters Norfolk Superior Court as jury deliberations are set to resume in the retrial of Karen Read.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #513
@RyanNBCBoston


“A devastating miscarriage of justice.” A spokesperson from the Albert and McCabe families just shared this statement about today’s verdict in the Karen Read trial @NBC10Boston

1750283452836.webp

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #514
Statement from Hank Brennan regarding the verdict in Commonwealth v. Karen Read

1751399812132.webp

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #515
NEW: A grand juror in a federal case has agreed to plead guilty to 1 count of criminal contempt for leaking grand jury info from Aug. 11, 2022 to March 4, 2024, according to the US Attorney's Office (DOJ). See snippet of press release here.

1752620663100.webp

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #516

BOSTON – A Dracut, Mass. woman has been charged with allegedly disclosing information presented to a federal grand jury to unauthorized individuals.

Jessica M. Leslie, 34, was charged on Friday, July 11, 2025 with one count of criminal contempt. The defendant has agreed to plead guilty and will make an initial appearance in federal court in Boston at a later date. A plea hearing has not yet been scheduled by the Court.

Jul 15
 
  • #517
Jul 15


Federal prosecutors did not say how they learned Leslie had disclosed secret grand jury information, but sources said authorities had been monitoring social media accounts and other communications during a case that received widespread attention.
 
  • #518
Prosecutors have not specifically named the cases that Leslie is accused of leaking information about. However, reports from WCVB and The Boston Globe from anonymous sources claim Leslie served on a federal grand jury investigating the state’s handling of the Karen Read case.


Leslie’s sentencing date was scheduled for Sept. 26 at 3 p.m., and Talwani requested a pre-sentencing report to be filed beforehand. Leslie’s attorney declined to comment on the case to MassLive.

 
  • #519
  • #520
NEW: After a renewed public records request (my first was denied due to the ongoing criminal trial), I have received the following emails from Norfolk County DA’s office regarding correspondence about the closing of the federal investigation into John O’Keefe’s death.

1756403331027.webp
1756403340648.webp

WBZ reported this in February as well.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
99
Guests online
2,526
Total visitors
2,625

Forum statistics

Threads
633,049
Messages
18,635,599
Members
243,391
Latest member
Mtnmomma86
Back
Top