MA - Justice for Officer John O’Keefe * NO DISCUSSION * media, timelines, docs * NO DISCUSSION *

New Posts

The judge took a break and is now discussing the power point Rentschler used and whether it can be admitted. Cannone wants to know if videos in there have been admitted previously. Brennan is objecting to have it admitted in its entirety


Attorney Yannetti is telling the judge the defense of renewing its request for a directed finding of not guilty. He’d like time to argue that in the morning.


Attorney Alessi is arguing some items marked for identification should be entered into evidence as exhibits.


Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan says he will call no further witnesses. So that’s off the table. Jurors will not come in tomorrow. Closing arguments Friday. Then deliberations begin!

@JHall7news
 
Good morning. We are having a hearing now in the #karenreadtrial - Judge Cannone enters and asks if we are ready for the "charge conference." The jury is not present.. Attnys Jackson and Little are not present.

Attorney Yannetti asks if now would be a good time to argue a renewed "motion for a directed verdict of not guilty. This will fail of course but Cannone tells him to go ahead. Yannetti says the ARCCA witnesses "drove a stake through the heart of the state's case.”

He points out the wounds are not consistent with a vehicle strike...he says the ALberts had a dog, a longtime family member - a dog the Alberts gave away.

Yannetti says the snow plow driver Brian Loughran had reason to protect the Alberts, yet testified that there was no body on the lawn. He urges a not guilty on all three indictments,


FOR THE CW- ADA Adam Lally responds. He says there has been no evidence of the presence of a dog in this case…none.


Lally discounts the plow truck driver - Loughran was confused and backed into a basketball hoop during his route. He says the state has evidence, motion should be denied. Cannone denies the motion.


We are moving onto the hearing on how the Judge should charge the jury.


Judge is discussing the bowden defense.. police failed with their investigation. Lally objects - say sthere's no evidence of that, just defense lawyer claims. Yannetti points out issues with processing the scene and not going into the ALbert home

Yannetti is successful- Judge will allow defense to argue this in closings tomorrow. Judge asks about third party culprit defense, which is a higher bar. "Is the defense going to argue Brian Higgins did this?”



Yannetti says no, same for Brian Albert. Judge says 'good that makes this easier.' So the defense may argue the police failed to investigate Albert and Higgins...and point out reasons why they should have been - but they may not directly blame Higgins and ALbert


The jury never heard from them. But they heard a lot about them. They must be wondering why?



THE DEFENSE is suggesting a new verdict slip, which Yannetti thinks is simpler and will prevent confusion. (See trial number 1) Judge says she is inclined to disagree and doubts she will adopt the defense proposal.




Judge says each side will get 1 hr 15 minutes for closing arguments, Jackson (who must be back in the Seaport writing) asked for 90 minutes.




Judge asks Yannetti if defense is sure it does not want a "consciousness of guilt" instruction for the jury - she says there is language that is helpful for the defendant. Yannetti says he knows the wording and defense is sure, they don't want that.



Here's what I found on that: If evidence of consciousness of guilt is admitted, the court should instruct
-1/ that they are not to convict the defendant on the basis of the offered evidence alone,

and 2/ and that they may, but need not, consider such evidence as one of the factors tending to prove the guilt of the defendant


Lastly the Judge gives Alessi the chance to argue that she should give the jury a curative instruction on exhibit 88. CW says no further instruction is needed. This exhibit was the John O'Keefe shirt in plexiglass..


Alessi says Brennan presented it to Dr Wolf. He mentioned holes in the back of the hoodie... he says the holes were caused by the criminalist, a witness in this case....Maureen Hartnett.


Note: the Judge has already instructed the jury the criminalist made the holes in th eback of the garment, (and therefore it had nothing to do with road rash.)


Alessi asks that Judge to strengthen her comments say "Dr Wolf correctly testified" on this - wants the date included. Judge asks if she mentioned the date..Alessi can't recall if she mentioned the date of when the holes were made. (she did say May 18 2023 on June 9th)


Alessi says he doesn't think the Judge was clear enough and there should be no opposition of this. He says it was a significant error.

@JHall7news

Note: correct spelling of last name Wolfe
 
@scooperon7


Judge Cannone:Read jurors will begin their deliberations tomorrow afternoon after closings in the morning starting at 9am sharp following by a 30 minute early lunch then she’ll instruct the jury before they deliberate the fate of Karen Read

https://twitter.com/x/status/1933183367010209803
 
Tortoise said:
Here's the witness testimony showing they didn't know a car was involved in John's death.

Katie McLaughlin, firefighter paramedic from timestamp 4.32.32

Q. When you were there trying to help the gentleman that was on the ground, did you know this would become a homicide investigation?

A. No.

Q. Did anybody tell you this was a homicide?

A. No.

Q. In fact when you spoke, when the defendant spoke to you, you were simply trying to get background information to help Mr O’Keefe? When she told you ‘I hit him, I hit him’ did she say that she hit him with something?

A. No

Q. Did you know whether it was with a fist or a foot?

A. No

Q. Or a Lexus?

A. No

Q. You mentioned this was not part of your role to investigate. Why didn’t you persist, why didn’t you follow up and ask more questions about that statement? What about the situation and the dynamics caused you not to ask the question?

Objection

Sustained as to that form

Q. Why didn’t you persist in getting more information from the defendant when she said I hit him I hit him?

A. I just, I felt bad for her at the time, it was a very disturbing scene and I did not want to push further down that road, it’s not my job and I didn’t feel comfortable doing it.



Lt Paul Gallagher (left 34 Fairview before 8 am, after uncovering drinking glass with leaf blower) from timestamp 5.56.24

Q. At this point did you have any position as you assessed the area whether this was a criminal investigation?

A. We had no crime at that time.

Q. When you were there were you looking for anything?

A. Yes, I was examining the scene.

Q. At that point did you have any reason to start a criminal investigation?

A. Not at that time, no.

Q. When you learned that Mr O’Keefe was found outside did you go look at the particular area?

A. Yes.

Q. Can you describe the area that was shown to you where Mr O’Keefe was found?

A. Sure, it was on the left side of the property of 34 Fairview. You could see where first responders and witnesses and police officers had walked up to the area. It was by a flagpole on the property line of no. 32 Fairview.

[...]

6.00.00

Q. When you were at the scene did you make a decision to do anything?

A. Yes

Q. What did you decide you were going to do?

A. Since the State police were not responding I decided to process the area where Mr O’Keefe was found and try to find out why he had the medical episode he was having.

Q. If you understood this to be a medical episode and at that point you didn’t have any information it was a crime scene why were you taking the time and effort to process the scene under these conditions?

A. Because that’s what we do. Even the hospital there could be a reason, there’s obviously a reason he’s there. I think we had a duty and obligation to check around his, where he was found and see if there was any explanation to what caused his medical condition.

Q. Did you focus on a particular area when you decided to look around?

A. I did.

A. What area were you going to look at?

A. Where it was pointed out he was found and where the blood pattern was.

Q. Were you thinking about looking in any other areas around that?

A. Not at that time.

Q. Why not?

A. We didn’t have any reason to, we only had the area where he was found.

Q. And at that point did you have any idea what caused his injuries?

A. We had none.

Q. At this point when you were pointed, or you were looking at the area where Mr O’Keefe was found, was the area getting covered up at all?

A. Yes it was.

Q. With what?

A. Snow.

Q. How quickly?

A. Very quickly. I believe the it was forecast that it came down 1-2 inches an hour if I recall.

Q. Did you have any idea how hard the ground was at that point?

Objection

Did you have any idea?

A. It was frozen.

Objection

I’ll allow it.

Q. How deep was the snow covering that frozen ground?

A. Approximately four inches at that time.

Q. When you went to look around the area did you consider using a rake or a shovel?

A. I did.

Q. And did you?

A. I did not.

Q. Why didn’t you use a shovel at that point?

A. I was afraid I would miss something or possibly break something.

Q. What could you break with a shovel?

A. Anything glass or anything of that nature.

Q. What was your decision about how you would search that area. What did you want to see?

A. I wanted to see anything that was possible, whether it was any type of weapon or any type of medical bottle or any reason that he could have come to where he was.

Click to expand...
Post and link provided by @Tortoise
Here's the witness testimony showing they didn't know a car was involved in John's death.
 
Good morning from the #KarenReadTrial in Dedham. I am in the courtroom - for closing arguments which will begin shortly.

Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan paces in front of the jury as he delivers his closing argument. He describes O'Keefe as a good man, who helped others. His mother is softly crying a few feet away from me.


Brennan: john o’keefe needed help - and there was only one person who could give him a chance. and she made a decision - in her lexus with a shattered tail light - she made a choice. She was drunk, she hit him, and she left.


Brennan asks the jury to listen to Read's own words...clips from interviews in which she is talking about her drinking


Brennan, his voice raised at times, paints a picture for the jury of a fight inside the Lexus, read driving toward home, but then making a conscious decision to gun the car in reverse in the direction of where John got out.



Brennan suggests Read was so frantic when she met up with Kerry Roberts and Jen Mccabe, because she drove by 34 Fairview before that. why so frantic? "Did she just see death?" He also points out testimony indicated Jen knew eaxtly where John was.

Brennan then asks Read to help us fill in the holes...plays a n interview clip in which she describes seeing a weird shaped lump...like a buffalo lying on a prairie.


BRENNAN has now also surpassed his time limit. But it seems like he's beginning to sum things up after suggesting ARCCA witnesses were not independent fact finder. He's playing an arcca video showing a crash test dummy being clipped and spinning with no lower body injury.


Brennan concludes. She left him alone to die. He is not an it, not a body, not a buffalo on a prairie. John O’keefe is a person and he was murdered by Karen Read.


Judge says she will instruct them after a break. She tells them after that 6 of the 18 will be alternates and this is the clerk's least favorite job. Jurors are dismissed for a half hour lunch.

@JHall7news
 
@cathyrusson


The jury in the second Karen Read trial began deliberations at 2:40 PM Eastern. Do you think there will be a verdict today? They can deliberate it until 5-5:30. I think that’s not enough time for a case like this and they will return Monday. But we’ll see!


3:23 PM · Jun 13, 2025
 
Timeline 2:36:47

Attorney Brennan:
John O'Keefe was 46 years old
46 years old
He spent his life helping people
He's described as a good man
kind generous thoughtful
He was a Boston police officer
He worked to help the community
Everything you've heard about this man
he was a good man
He helped people
When his niece and nephew had nobody he took them in
He took them in
John O'Keefe seemed to be the type of person who would help anybody at any time
And on January 29th 2022 John O'Keefe needed some help
He needed help from somebody else
You see John O'Keefe had just been hit by Karen Reed in front of 34 Fair View Road and he lay on the ground
dying
And he needed help
someone to reach out a hand
someone to knock on a door
someone to make a phone call to 911
even anonymously not take responsibility just to help
And there was only one person in this entire planet who could help him that morning to give him a chance
Maybe it was a 33% chance if he met the Aizik Wolf of the World but to give him
a chance
And that one person who could help him that morning was this defendant right
here Karen Read
And she made a decision in her Lexus with the shattered tail light
Debris failed all over the front yard and John O'Keefe lying helpless like a child on the front yard
She made a choice
She didn't call 911
She didn't run to his aid
She didn't knock on a door
She made a decision about herself in her Lexus
She drove away
She was drunk
She hit him and she left him to die
She was drunk She hit him and she left him to die

 
Timestamp 2:42:12

Attorney Brennan:
The relationship is crumbling And you heard a little bit
about what that relationship was like Kaylee his niece told you when there was an argument
John would do what John does
He would walk away
She described to you one time to get away from the scene He walked into his bedroom but the defendant wouldn't let
it go
Pounding on his door having to get the last word never letting go of the
fight kind of mirrors what happens on January 29th 2022



Timestamp 2:48:47

Attorney Brennan:

And then Shannon Burgess well you don't like what he says don't attack the data attack the man
He can be mocked for his LinkedIn profile or his undated CV
But what he did is he found a key critical piece of this case that did not exist before
He found a recent weapon and it was that SD card
The SD card that everybody missed including the defense expert
Everybody missed it
So as much as you want to make fun of him Shannon Burgess found the key so that we could have the time and date and location coordinated for an impenetrable timeline that can't be broken
That's what Shannon Burgess did
 
Last edited:
Timestamp 2:59:41

Attorney Brennan:

she doesn't drive away
She takes that 6,000 lb Lexus and she makes a decision And the decision is that she steps on the gas after banging it into reverse

Before we talk about what happens next I want to talk to you a little bit about the charges in this case
And I hate to digress but it's important so we really understand what we're talking about here
I have no authority to talk about the law in this case

The honorable Judge Cannone will do that But I want to talk to you a little bit about the charges
Don't rely on my interpretation of the law It's the judge who has that special power
But I want to explain to you a couple things so when you think about what happens next you can really assess the facts of this case with the charges against Ms Read

She is charged with second degree murder
It sounds ominous It is It's a serious charge Second degree murder
When most people think murder they think shooting or stabbing somebody It's natural to think that Second degree
murder is different
It's not first-degree murder I told you at the beginning of this case I told you that
we were not going to suggest or try to prove that Ms Read intended to kill John O'Keefe
That was never part of this case We're not claiming that I told you that we were not ever going to try to
prove that she even intended to hit him We never suggested we would try to prove that
And we're not trying to prove that she intended to hit him We're not

What we are obligated to prove and what
we have proven from the evidence in this case of second degree murder is that she intended an act and that is putting the car into reverse and heading back towards John O'Keefe
She intended that act The question then becomes did her conduct create a clear plain strong likelihood of death

Late at night dark beginning to snow under the influence of alcohol
knowing where she stopped and left him after an argument heading back in
reverse to the exact spot right near where she left him
at over 24 miles hour accelerating at over 75%

You need to ask yourself are you convinced if somebody does that does that create a plain and strong
likelihood of death and if there's no doubt in your mind that she intended to hit that
accelerator in reverse and that conduct will create a clear and plain
likelihood of death then she's guilty of that crime

Whatever the label is she would be guilty of that crime



Timestamp 3:03:40

When Karen Reed in the midst of that tension and fight after she drove away and was gone disengaged
when she came back for the last word in the darkness the beginning of the
snow under the alcohol and decided to stop
her Lexus decided to put it in reverse decided to accelerate 75% in the
exact same direction of where she left him and then hit him and he died
I suggest to you that is second degree murder
 
Timestamp 3:16:56

Attorney Brennan:

But she wakes up She wakes up early the next morning You can take that down please And when she wakes up
she doesn't call Jen McCabe and say "Where's John?"
She doesn't call Brian Higgins
Has his number Has been texting with him Hey was John at a party with you
did you see John tonight she knows exactly where she is and she's frantic

So she wakes up Kayle that young girl at the time and she says
she's panicked She can't understand what is she saying call Jen McCabe Call Jen McCabe Why is she calling Jen McCabe she calls Jen McCabe
You know what she doesn't say when she calls Jen McCabe
when did he leave the house
what happened last night no no no She calls and says "I left him at the waterfall I left him at the waterfall
See now it's gone from panicked to self-preservation I left him at the waterfall
And Jen says "Left him at the waterfall we saw you in front of the house."
Click [phone hangs up] hangs up hangs up

So then she calls someone that she doesn't know very well
She calls Kerry Roberts
But now she has to pivot because someone has seen her in the exact spot that John will be found soon
Whether she's the first one there or somebody else
John will be found
Maybe Lucky missed him It's a snowstorm
You can't see but someone's going to find him at some point
So she calls Kerry Roberts
It's no longer she left him at the waterfall
She pivots and she calls Kerry Kerry Kerry
John's dead I think he got hit by a plow
Why do you think she chose those words why did she choose those words because
she knew that there was a collision with a large motor vehicle and she had to
substitute her 6,000lb Lexus for another big vehicle I think he got hit by a plow

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Tortoise
UK - Bernadette Walker, 17, Peterborough, 18 Jul 2020 **TIMELINE ONLY**NO DISCUSSION**
Replies
15
Views
5K
CSIAngus
CSIAngus
margarita25
TN - Jordan Allen Gorman, 9, Joelton, 15 Nov 2020 - MAPS, MEDIA, TIMELINES **NO DISCUSSION**
3 4 5
Replies
88
Views
5K
margarita25
margarita25
HopeRains
MI - Sep 2022 Article - Without autopsy records, 224 Jane and John Does in Wayne County may forever be nameless
Replies
5
Views
2K
Brightchaser47
B
margarita25
TX - Marisela Botello, 23, Dallas (from Seattle), 5 Oct 2020 - Map, Media, Timelines *NO DISCUSSION*
2 3 4
Replies
68
Views
7K
PommyMommy
PommyMommy
imstilla.grandma
Deceased/Not Found Cracking Cold Cases is Carl Koppelman’s Obsession
Replies
6
Views
4K
Bit of hope
Bit of hope

Members online

... and 80 more.
Total: 451 (members: 81, guests: 370)

Online statistics

Members online
81
Guests online
370
Total visitors
451
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
625,548
Messages
18,505,944
Members
240,811
Latest member
NJbystander
Back
Top