MA MA - Molly Bish, 16, Warren, 27 Jun 2000

[dotr]

June 27 2020
Molly Bish Cold Case: Family Marks 20 Years Since Teen's Disappearance
''WARREN (CBS) — Saturday marks the 20 year anniversary of the disappearance of Molly Bish. The sixteen-year-old was last seen at her lifeguard post at a pond in Warren. Her remains were found three years later in Palmer.

Molly’s family will remember her through a “hybrid vigil” Saturday night because of coronavirus concerns, according to WSHM. Messages of hope will be written on rocks for the Bish’s garden and then there will be a 20-car caravan to represent the passing time.

Molly Bish. (Family photo)

No arrests have ever been made in connection with Molly’s disappearance and death. Over the years, investigators have searched an old West Brookfield campground for a buried car and advanced DNA testing was ordered for evidence.

Most recently, the cold case served as the inspiration behind a bill to expand DNA use.''

 

[dotr]

Jun 27, 2020

 

[somequestions]

In the case of Molly Bish, if it was not the person in the white car who abducted her, then the real suspect is an incredibly lucky person to have that type of lead cause so much confusion in the case.

Her mother saw the white car the day before the abduction on June 26, 2000. On the day of the abduction, June 27, 2000, the sand truck driver saw the white car a few minutes before Molly Bish and her mother arrived. A cemetery worker also reported seeing a white car that morning. So there are three witnesses who all saw the same thing. It was inevitable that investigators would follow that lead. A composite sketch later produced a combination of good suspects who look like the sketch.

There were certain aspects of the crime scene out on the beach that seemed a little strange. For example, in order to lifeguard you need a whistle. Yet Molly's backpack was on a bench behind the area where she was sitting and where her stuff was lined up. The whistle was in the backpack(I think). A mother of one of the children later went into Molly's backpack to get the whistle so she could substitute lifeguard while everyone tried to figure out what happened to Molly. I figure Molly put the backpack on the bench maybe because she did not want sand to get on it? So maybe that is why it was not closer to her other stuff.

Then there was the orange flotation device that was not at the spot where her lawn chair was set up. Many lifeguards will hold this across their torso when lifeguarding because it is usually essential for drowning victims. It looks like a long orange or red piece of foam. Lifeguards extend this to a drowning victim to grab onto so the victim does not "climb all over" or flail around causing the lifeguard to also have difficulty swimming and making the rescue. Maybe Commin's Pond lifeguards did not use this? I don't know.

The point is that it does not seem like Molly Bish was completely set up to start lifeguarding that day, yet she had obviously taken off her sandals and even put the water bottle in one of them. I suppose you could make the argument that maybe she had taken off her sandals and was going to walk over to the shed in her bare feet since it was just sand(supposedly there is a shed where the lifeguarding stuff was kept).

And finally there was the open first aid kit which is not that much of a surprise. The theory is that basically someone faked an injury and when Molly Bish opened the first aid kit, the abductor threatened or grabbed her and took off with her up the slope behind the lifeguard area. This leads to the cemetery. Leaving a first aid kit open when small children are about to be around is a safety issue. It should always be closed. So it makes sense that the parks commissioner closed the first aid kit later that morning.

Supposedly the parks commissioner was helping paint a fence with another man according to information from another person who posts on here. It is hard to know what information is good and what information is not. Obviously a person cannot paint a fence with a witness and abduct someone at the same time. I admit I have thought that maybe it was the parks commissioner because I thought he might have called a hospital or her family or asked someone out on the beach that day if the lifeguard or one of the kids was injured before calling police. And maybe he did do these things but we are not privy to the same information as the police. Or it could have been the sand truck driver too since it seems like he would be the last one to see Molly Bish alive. I don't know.

This case leaves you with all these questions about how it all happened on June 27, 2000. Was it really the person in the white car? Was Molly Bish really abducted right after she opened her first aid kit? It is easy to theorize in this case because there are no answers. and it seems like everyone is still a suspect just like they were back on June 27, 2000.

 

[Richard]

Molly Bish, 16
Abducted and Murdered 27 June 2000

 

[somequestions]

I went to the beach today. I thought about how this case may have played out the day Molly Bish was abducted. Since Molly was reported missing from the beach I wondered what was said over the two way radio to the police. The story is that the parks commissioner came to the beach that day, waited around for a while, and then made the call to the police using the two way radio Molly was supposed to use for emergencies. He did this at 11:44 am according to the show Disappeared. And I am guessing he did this after he closed the open first aid kit.

There also looks to be a municipal building next to the St. Paul's cemetery. A person driving a sand dump truck could probably park their dump truck there and quickly walk down the path to the beach to get to the lifeguard. Where did the sand truck driver go after delivering the sand that day?

It is a case like this that makes me think about Abigail Williams and Liberty German's murder case. The reason is that it really could be that the person who abducted and murdered Molly Bish was the sketch of the man in the white car and he just has not been found yet. After all this time, everything else could be pure speculation. The only thing left is the time that has passed. It is kind of sad how time affects a case like this.

 

[PayrollNerd]

Posted 5 days ago But the referenced article is 4 month old (6/21/2020). No comments.

Remember My Name.

Molly Bish’s family continues search for her killer 20 years after murder

The Bish case remains an active investigation in Worcester County, and work is ongoing in trying to find Molly’s killer, said District Attorney Joseph D. Early Jr.

“The Molly Bish case is turning 20 years old, but the tips still come in every week and every tip is followed up on,” Early said. “We have had many items tested for DNA over the years and we continue to do so. This case is very active and a tremendous amount of work is being done. I’m hopeful it will be solved.”

 

[PayrollNerd]

Published 9/29/2020:

https://www.carsonburnstv.com/post/...wXVm-6TATM9RWA-LS3eTXgn8k4QaPqDHquqIU7wy09xos

 

[PayrollNerd]

Published 4/19/2019

The Murder of Molly Bish
In 2014, the Bish family held a campaign called “Just One Piece”, which resulted in four different people coming forward to identify a new person of interest in the case. While some of this information has been withheld, as to not jeopardize the investigation, what had been shared says that witnesses recalled seeing a man visit an old campground in West Brookfield, Massachusetts, just a few miles from where Molly was taken and had left the same day she disappeared.

According to the witnesses, he had returned the day after and his face was bloody and scratched. He had been yelling about something bad happening in the woods the night before, and six months later he was heard bragging about how he knew he was a person of interest in the case, but had never been interviewed.

The family eventually hired a new private investigator named Sarah Stein, who told them that authorities would be searching for the car Molly’s killer could have been driving. She’d received a tip that revealed a car that was similar to the one Magi had seen had been buried in a former campground site in the Brookfield area.

Investigators used ground penetrating radar to search for the car and found “compelling” anomalies at multiple areas of interest that led them to search the campground again a few days later. This has led Sarah to believe something is buried in the area.

In 2017, volunteers went to the campground to search for the suspected car. While State Troopers were present, it was not considered an official part of the all-volunteer search effort.

According to Heather, a man who physically resembles the composite sketch of the suspect still lives in the area, is a hunter and fisherman, and had access to the campground through a friendship with the property’s former owner. She also said that heavy construction equipment needed to bury a car was available at the campground around the time Molly went missing and has since been sold.

 

[Ozoner]

The reason is that it really could be that the person who abducted and murdered Molly Bish was the sketch of the man in the white car and he just has not been found yet.

Snipped and BBM.

I'd say it's a given that the man in the white car abducted and murdered Molly Bish.

 

[somequestions]

Snipped and BBM.

I'd say it's a given that the man in the white car abducted and murdered Molly Bish.

I agree with you, but in a case like this it would be nice if you could at least try and eliminate known people even if it was an unknown that committed the crime. I have so many questions in this case.

First, it was supposedly Molly Bish's eighth day of work on Tuesday, June 27, 2000. On this particular day kids were starting swimming lessons so there would always have been a witness to state that Molly Bish was not there since about 10 am. But if Molly Bish had been kidnapped on any of the previous days she worked, would there have been a witness to state approximately when she disappeared or would it just have been when someone finally noticed she was gone because it would have just been a normal day when people might or might not have gone to the beach?

The other major question has to do with the two way radio call made at 11:44 am by the parks commissioner to police. If the first aid kit was open and Molly Bish was not there, did the parks commissioner ask the police officer who responded on the radio if she had already made an emergency radio call in to the police? The news programs about the case seem very unclear about this. I wonder how it was phrased. Did he say, "Hey, we cannot seem to find Molly on the beach grounds anywhere. She is not here and the first aid kit is open. Did you get any calls from her regarding an injury or where she may have gone?" Or was it more generic like, "People out on the beach say the lifeguard has not been here since the start of swim lessons. We cannot find her anywhere." I suppose the two way radio was already on since her brother said he trained her to do the radio checks.

So I agree that the white car is the most logical lead because of all the witnesses, but it would be nice to state for sure that it was indeed the man in the white car who abducted and murdered Molly Bish.

 

[dotr]

Molly Bish’s family continues search for her killer 20 years after murder
''The same article quotes a friend of Molly who said he did not think she should have been working alone. He said a middle-age man in a white Chevy Corsica that no one knew had been seen hanging around in the parking lot in recent days, staring at Molly.

Magi Bish would recall later that on the day before Molly disappeared, a man smoking a cigarette was sitting in a white car when she dropped Molly off. One of the unanswered questions in the case is what if the same man came back the next day and abducted Molly?

With the help of a sketch artist, Magi Bish described a middle-aged man with a mustache and hair combed off his forehead.''

A sketch artist's rendering of the smoking man in the white car seen by Molly Bish's mother when she dropped the teen off at Comins Pond in Warren the day she disappeared. (Police sketch/File photo)
''Based on the sketch, police questioned several men. One of them was a man named Rodney Stanger, who used to fish and hunt in the area. Stanger in 2010 was sentenced to 25 years in prison for the fatal stabbing of a woman two years earlier.

Massachusetts authorities have interviewed him several times at his prison in Florida, but he has denied involvement in the Bish case.''

 

[somequestions]

Molly Bish’s family continues search for her killer 20 years after murder
''The same article quotes a friend of Molly who said he did not think she should have been working alone. He said a middle-age man in a white Chevy Corsica that no one knew had been seen hanging around in the parking lot in recent days, staring at Molly.

Magi Bish would recall later that on the day before Molly disappeared, a man smoking a cigarette was sitting in a white car when she dropped Molly off. One of the unanswered questions in the case is what if the same man came back the next day and abducted Molly?

With the help of a sketch artist, Magi Bish described a middle-aged man with a mustache and hair combed off his forehead.''

A sketch artist's rendering of the smoking man in the white car seen by Molly Bish's mother when she dropped the teen off at Comins Pond in Warren the day she disappeared. (Police sketch/File photo)
''Based on the sketch, police questioned several men. One of them was a man named Rodney Stanger, who used to fish and hunt in the area. Stanger in 2010 was sentenced to 25 years in prison for the fatal stabbing of a woman two years earlier.

Massachusetts authorities have interviewed him several times at his prison in Florida, but he has denied involvement in the Bish case.''

I did not know that it was specifically a white Chevy Corsica that police were looking for or that other people had seen it hanging out there before in the parking lot at Commins Pond. That white car was seen by so many people on the day of Molly Bish's abduction. That combined with a good sketch from a great eyewitness, her mother, who got a good look at the individual inside the car and it was no surprise police invested so much time in trying to track down this person driving the white car. I would have done the same thing as police by trying to chase down the white car as the best lead in Molly Bish's disappearance.

Any other theories in this case are really just guesses. It would be nice if there were more information in this case, especially regarding the sequence of events and timeline regarding known people in the investigation. Who has a solid alibi for 10:00 - 10:20 am on June 27, 2000?

And what about that open first aid kit found next to Molly Bish's belongings out on the beach?

Who opened it? We all suppose it was Molly. When you run that possible scenario of the crime and think about it based on Molly Bish opening up the first aid kit it is still is kind of odd. Here is why. Without a picture of the actual crime scene though, this is another guess but here it goes. You need to be able to picture the setup of Molly Bish's things out on the beach that day.

The main theory is that someone came down from the woods where St. Paul Cemetery was and used a ruse to say they were injured. The abductor would approach from Molly's right hand side while she is sitting in the chair or checking the first aid kit supplies. After telling Molly they are injured, Molly looks down or bends over to get whatever she needs out of the first aid kit. One problem. When the abductor goes to grab her how do they not knock over the first aid kit? There would be a first aid kit between the abductor and Molly Bish.

So then maybe we guess that the abductor told Molly to follow them to someone else who was injured. This would explain why all of her things seem to remain intact and not moved. But lifeguard policy is to "Call first". And yet even if you were to dismiss the fact that she did not put on her flip flops, it looks as if she never grabbed her police radio.

All these questions and all you can do is theorize about what happened that day because no one really knows.

 

[SAMS]

.

 

[somequestions]

Molly Bish's case has always felt like it was not a typical abduction/murder. That is what makes it interesting. There is very little information out there to help rule known people in or out as suspects so there is a lot of guessing. I have theories about everyone. Nothing in this case proves that any one person is responsible. It could be the sand truck driver just as much as it could be the work supervisor just as much as it could be the mysterious man in the white car. But in this post I am going to focus on the work supervisor because I think his involvement would be the most unusual. This is all guesswork. But who would be your number 1 suspect in this case and why?

How did the abductor commit the crime?

I always felt this was an alibi case. Molly's mom dropped her off at 10 am. The first witness showed up at 10:20am. Supposedly, according to some other information, the work supervisor was painting a fence nearby with another man. I do not know if I can trust this information. But if the other man can vouch for the fact that the work supervisor never left from between 10 and 10:20 am then in my opinion there is no way it was the work supervisor who committed this crime. This goes for any known suspect in this case. But we have to remember that we do not know if Molly Bish was kidnapped at 10 am or 10:19 am right before the witness arrived. For the sake of the theory, I am going to assume the work supervisor does not have an airtight alibi.

In my opinion, the only way the crime could be committed is if Molly Bish was taken somewhere else and either left there unconscious or restrained. From Commin's Pond to the farthest edges of Warren, MA takes 15 minutes at most so you have to elongate the alibi scenario by 30 minutes to at least 10:50am since there is no way to know exactly when she was abducted at Commin's Pond.

Why the open first aid kit?

This could be for any number of reasons including the theory that most tend to believe, that someone faked an injury and Molly opened the kit. But I think there could be other reasons. Maybe the abductor felt they needed latex gloves in the kit so as not to leave fingerprints, DNA, or other evidence on Molly's bathing suit or clothes? Or it could have been left open to indicate distress. A unique aspect of this case is that even with the first aid kit open on the beach and the lifeguard missing no one seemed to think anything was wrong. I am assuming the mother's pond swimming event started at 10:30 am if the witness arrived at 10:20 am. So if one of the women out at the pond on the beach had felt something was wrong maybe they would have sent someone to the police station to report the lifeguard was not on duty and might be injured. Eventually at 11:44 am the work supervisor reported the lifeguard missing.

I got the impression in this case that the investigation was based on everything happening consecutively. Molly was abducted, murdered, and then placed or buried on Whiskey Hill in Palmer, MA. And since that would definitely take some time, as long as a person had an alibi for between 10 am to 12 noon(my guess), then there is no way they could have committed the crime.

So in my opinion, Molly Bish's case is not typical and the timing is either incredibly lucky or unlucky depending on the perspective.

Imagine if this case did not happen on a day with a known event planned. I think it would have been much more difficult to determine the exact time Molly Bish was abducted and there would be more difficultly trying to verify alibis because of that. The only way anyone could be contacted who would go out to the beach on the day of the abduction would be with police pleading for information in the news media for anyone there that day to come forward. This is if we assume that people would take the same approach towards seeing an open first aid kit with no lifeguard and think nothing of it until someone actually reports the lifeguard missing.

Even the body recovery did not seem typical. They only found 26 of her 206 bones. Is that typical when a body is not recovered for almost 3 years that animals displace the bones that much that no one ever finds the rest of them? Could a body be put in a well, for example, and then the bones find there way to another location via water somehow? Is that possible? <modsnip>

At least from abduction cases I have looked at, this one does not seem like your typical abduction. Maybe someday there will be some type of forensic evidence that helps solve this case.

 

[Ozoner]

Molly Bish's case has always felt like it was not a typical abduction/murder. That is what makes it interesting. There is very little information out there to help rule known people in or out as suspects so there is a lot of guessing. I have theories about everyone. Nothing in this case proves that any one person is responsible. It could be the sand truck driver just as much as it could be the work supervisor just as much as it could be the mysterious man in the white car. But in this post I am going to focus on the work supervisor because I think his involvement would be the most unusual. This is all guesswork. But who would be your number 1 suspect in this case and why?

How did the abductor commit the crime?

I always felt this was an alibi case. Molly's mom dropped her off at 10 am. The first witness showed up at 10:20am. Supposedly, according to some other information, the work supervisor was painting a fence nearby with another man. I do not know if I can trust this information. But if the other man can vouch for the fact that the work supervisor never left from between 10 and 10:20 am then in my opinion there is no way it was the work supervisor who committed this crime. This goes for any known suspect in this case. But we have to remember that we do not know if Molly Bish was kidnapped at 10 am or 10:19 am right before the witness arrived. For the sake of the theory, I am going to assume the work supervisor does not have an airtight alibi.

In my opinion, the only way the crime could be committed is if Molly Bish was taken somewhere else and either left there unconscious or restrained. From Commin's Pond to the farthest edges of Warren, MA takes 15 minutes at most so you have to elongate the alibi scenario by 30 minutes to at least 10:50am since there is no way to know exactly when she was abducted at Commin's Pond.

Why the open first aid kit?

This could be for any number of reasons including the theory that most tend to believe, that someone faked an injury and Molly opened the kit. But I think there could be other reasons. Maybe the abductor felt they needed latex gloves in the kit so as not to leave fingerprints, DNA, or other evidence on Molly's bathing suit or clothes? Or it could have been left open to indicate distress. A unique aspect of this case is that even with the first aid kit open on the beach and the lifeguard missing no one seemed to think anything was wrong. I am assuming the mother's pond swimming event started at 10:30 am if the witness arrived at 10:20 am. So if one of the women out at the pond on the beach had felt something was wrong maybe they would have sent someone to the police station to report the lifeguard was not on duty and might be injured. Eventually at 11:44 am the work supervisor reported the lifeguard missing.

I got the impression in this case that the investigation was based on everything happening consecutively. Molly was abducted, murdered, and then placed or buried on Whiskey Hill in Palmer, MA. And since that would definitely take some time, as long as a person had an alibi for between 10 am to 12 noon(my guess), then there is no way they could have committed the crime.

So in my opinion, Molly Bish's case is not typical and the timing is either incredibly lucky or unlucky depending on the perspective.

Imagine if this case did not happen on a day with a known event planned. I think it would have been much more difficult to determine the exact time Molly Bish was abducted and there would be more difficultly trying to verify alibis because of that. The only way anyone could be contacted who would go out to the beach on the day of the abduction would be with police pleading for information in the news media for anyone there that day to come forward. This is if we assume that people would take the same approach towards seeing an open first aid kit with no lifeguard and think nothing of it until someone actually reports the lifeguard missing.

Even the body recovery did not seem typical. They only found 26 of her 206 bones. Is that typical when a body is not recovered for almost 3 years that animals displace the bones that much that no one ever finds the rest of them? Could a body be put in a well, for example, and then the bones find there way to another location via water somehow? Is that possible? <modsnip>

At least from abduction cases I have looked at, this one does not seem like your typical abduction. Maybe someday there will be some type of forensic evidence that helps solve this case.

I can answer your question about the bones. It is not at all unusual for bones to be dispersed by animals.

However, there have been cases where a killer moved a body or part of a body long after the murder in order to misdirect the investigation.

I am convinced that the guy in the white Corsica was the killer; I'm just not sure who he was. If he was even remotely local to the area, then it's likely that his name was among the tips provided and the someone gave him a bogus alibi.

 

[somequestions]

I can answer your question about the bones. It is not at all unusual for bones to be dispersed by animals.

However, there have been cases where a killer moved a body or part of a body long after the murder in order to misdirect the investigation.

I am convinced that the guy in the white Corsica was the killer; I'm just not sure who he was. If he was even remotely local to the area, then it's likely that his name was among the tips provided and the someone gave him a bogus alibi.

I cannot argue with the guy in the white Corsica possibly being her abductor/killer. I even researched to see if there was any sort of reason psychologically people see a white car so often. I did not find much that would explain it. I can definitely understand why this investigation would be frustrating.

I know bones can be dispersed by animals, but I also thought she had on a tang top and shorts that were not recovered. It seemed like the Massachusetts State Police really combed the area looking for any more evidence after her bones were discovered.

I guess maybe that could be the point of all my posts about this case. What seems atypical to me is rather typical. Maybe this case is just as typical as Holly Piirainen or Tabitha Tuders except it happened at a small beach. It is just not typical to me.

It could be a stranger in a white car, but then you come back to the location of her bones that were only found after nearly 3 years. I think that person would have to live nearby. In my opinion, whoever murdered Molly Bish lives close to the Whiskey Hill area in Palmer, MA where those bones were recovered.

 

[Ozoner]

I cannot argue with the guy in the white Corsica possibly being her abductor/killer. I even researched to see if there was any sort of reason psychologically people see a white car so often. I did not find much that would explain it. I can definitely understand why this investigation would be frustrating.

I know bones can be dispersed by animals, but I also thought she had on a tang top and shorts that were not recovered. It seemed like the Massachusetts State Police really combed the area looking for any more evidence after her bones were discovered.

I guess maybe that could be the point of all my posts about this case. What seems atypical to me is rather typical. Maybe this case is just as typical as Holly Piirainen or Tabitha Tuders except it happened at a small beach. It is just not typical to me.

It could be a stranger in a white car, but then you come back to the location of her bones that were only found after nearly 3 years. I think that person would have to live nearby. In my opinion, whoever murdered Molly Bish lives close to the Whiskey Hill area in Palmer, MA where those bones were recovered.

It's possible, but I'm not sure that I'd go quite that far. It's likely that the killer was at least familiar with that area. However, some killers have traveled quite far from home in order to dispose of remains, so I wouldn't rule out any suspects just because they didn't live in that area.

 

[somequestions]

It's possible, but I'm not sure that I'd go quite that far. It's likely that the killer was at least familiar with that area. However, some killers have traveled quite far from home in order to dispose of remains, so I wouldn't rule out any suspects just because they didn't live in that area.

I think that if someone like the man in the white car has 24 hours to think about how he is going to commit the crime and get rid of the body, he would choose a place that is very familiar to him. Our most familiar places tend to revolve around our home base. So that is why I think the murderer in this case lives somewhere around the Palmer, MA area near Whiskey Hill. Spatially how big of a radius could that be? I would guess it is no bigger than the distance from Commin's Pond in Warren, MA to Whiskey Hill in Palmer, MA.

There are a lot of location questions like this in Molly Bish's case. For example, how would a person know there is a path to a cemetery when you walk up the hill behind Molly Bish's beach chair? At least on google maps, it looks like you cannot tell Commin's Pond is behind this St. Paul Cemetery if you are driving on the road next to the cemetery. It also looks like you cannot tell there is a cemetery by driving down Commin's Pond Road to the beach parking area. Just coming up with that idea seems to me like whoever it was had to be very familiar with the layout of the Commin's Pond beach area.

These are my opinions only. I agree that there is no proof that points towards any one person in this case. It is an interesting case to discuss because of all the possibilities. This man in the white car could have committed this crime and then disappeared.

 

[somequestions]

In terms of the layout of Commins Pond beach, St. Paul Cemetery, and the sightings of the white car with the person most likely responsible for the abduction/murder of Molly Bish, this case has always seemed very strange. You have to remember a few things first:

1. Commins Pond Road is one way in, one way out as far as I can tell. The end of the road dead ends into the Commins Pond Beach parking lot.

2. If you are sitting in your car at the Commins Pond Beach parking lot you cannot see the beach. So there would be no way to know if the lifeguard had arrived or if any other witnesses were out on the beach unless you get out of your car and walked down and to the right towards the beach area.

On the day of the abduction, supposedly a sand truck was delivering sand when Molly Bish was dropped off. The sand truck driver later said a white car had been in the beach parking lot only a few minutes before Molly Bish and her mother arrived. The question is why.

Was the white car driver going to try and abduct Molly from the beach parking lot if she showed up alone? Did he switch to his plan B once he saw the sand truck driver and realized he cannot abduct her in front of a witness?

That part always seemed odd to me. I would think that if someone knew about the cemetery path behind Commins Pond and the beach parking lot that they would not even consider trying to abduct her from the parking lot, especially if they had 24 hours to think about it. I would have thought the abductor would be waiting near the top of the hill in back of the Commins Pond Beach area ready to abduct the lifeguard once they realized the lifeguard was there and no one was around.

And I keep using the word lifeguard, but I should really use the words Molly Bish. It had to be the person in the white car because she was wearing shorts and a tang top with a blue bathing suit underneath and that person saw her previously the day before in the beach parking lot. Someone sets up a chair out on the beach with a backpack does not make them a lifeguard. Or maybe her first aid kit was one of those that said "FIRST AID" kit on it? How the crime actually unfolded that day is one of the most interesting aspects of this case.

 

[ManicMuggle83]

I cannot argue with the guy in the white Corsica possibly being her abductor/killer. I even researched to see if there was any sort of reason psychologically people see a white car so often. I did not find much that would explain it. I can definitely understand why this investigation would be frustrating.

I know bones can be dispersed by animals, but I also thought she had on a tang top and shorts that were not recovered. It seemed like the Massachusetts State Police really combed the area looking for any more evidence after her bones were discovered.

I guess maybe that could be the point of all my posts about this case. What seems atypical to me is rather typical. Maybe this case is just as typical as Holly Piirainen or Tabitha Tuders except it happened at a small beach. It is just not typical to me.

It could be a stranger in a white car, but then you come back to the location of her bones that were only found after nearly 3 years. I think that person would have to live nearby. In my opinion, whoever murdered Molly Bish lives close to the Whiskey Hill area in Palmer, MA where those bones were recovered.

Her missing boxers and tank top were discovered by a private investigator in 2014 across the street from where her body was found. So, it may have been Massachusetts biggest search, but they missed key evidence across the street..

Possible new evidence surfaces in Molly Bish murder