MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #12

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #621
  • #622
Ugh this is just not productive. Wolfe's claims are based and formed on science alone, not characterisation, what people may or may not have said or that they went to the bar that night....jmo
 
  • #623
  • #624
  • #625
  • #626
@SueNBCBoston

Lally rereads the disclaimer to his report.
Lally is done
Jackson up.
Now that you know about then DNA and other info, does that change your conclusion!
-no
Jackson is done.
Witness is excused.


12:12 PM · Jun 24, 2024
 
  • #627
@BienickWCVB

"Absolutely not," Wolfe says when asked by Jackson if the hair and the DNA evidence change his opinion about the nature of the collision.


12:12 PM · Jun 24, 2024
 
  • #628
Jackson asks Wolfe whether any of that "Lally razzle dazzle" that he added in during cross, if it has changed his opinion, Wolfe said absolutely NOT! jmo.
 
  • #629
It was TOUCH DNA and Lally knows that!!!
Arghhh he makes me say bad words.
IMO
Isn't it shocking that someone who's in a relationship with someone may actually touch their belongings..can't believe it
 
  • #630
I know that people are busy but I feel like we are missing some posters
I’ve been too engrossed watching the experts provide useful and constructive testimony and dismayed by Lally’s ineffectiveness to comment in realtime. I have FOMO on real facts and evidence.
 
  • #631
@TedDanielnews

AL asks DW if he saw the video of KR backing out of JO's driveway and making contact with JO's vehicle.
He says no.

Lally then asks if the damage to KR's taillight could have been caused by an impact less than 5mph
DW: "at that speed, no"

Defense has previously said that impact "cracked" taillight but did not shatter it.


12:15 PM · Jun 24, 2024
 
  • #632
@SueNBCBoston

Next witness is Dr Andrew Rentschler ARCA, engineer, accident reconstructionEstablishing credentials, studies crash injuries & crash forces.

Studies kinematics.




@BienickWCVB

Next defense witness: Andrew Rentschler, an biomechanics and accident reconstruction expert with ARCCA. (He's Wolfe's co-worker.)

1719245889936.png
 
  • #633
I hate the way Lally speeds up his sentences until they almost run together. it's off putting

Eta and now he's beginning to raise his voice/shout towards the end of his sentences. Back to mute and sub titles
And why did he stop saying “sort of” and “kind of”?!
 
  • #634
@BienickWCVB

Wolfe says he was aware that a hair was found on the car but not aware that hair matched O'Keefe's mitochondrial DNA to more than 99%.


12:07 PM · Jun 24, 2024

@TedDanielnews

AL: Are you aware that microscopic pieces of plastic were recovered from Mr. O'Keefe's clothing?
DW: No, I don't believe so


12:08 PM · Jun 24, 2024
His answers are right on target. Because he was hired by the FBI to prove if this accident was even possible, which his team proved it wasn't.

Besides, Lally leaves out it is touch dna. JO could have touched that taillight at anytime.

Don't even get me started on the taillight pieces recovered from his clothing. There is NO evidence there was a proper investigation, like dixie cups sitting on garage floor....
 
  • #635
Wait till later when they find out the FBI did. I would be sorely vexed!
If they were paying attention to lally's witnesses they could have gotten a clue.

Ryan Nagel just said he may have talked to the “feds” in May 2023. That is the first time the federal investigation has been directly referenced and it comes from a Commonwealth witness.
 
  • #636
@TedDanielnews

The defense calls Dr. Andrew Rentschler, Senior Biomechanist specializing in the study of the forces and mechanics associated with injuries to the human body at ARCCA


12:18 PM · Jun 24, 2024
 
  • #637
  • #638
Lally asking a question about what the agency that hired him gave him...if I was a juror hearing the word agency would give me a clue..
I’m a very curious person. If I was on this jury, it would frustrate me greatly to know there was outside “agency” involvement of some kind but not be allowed to know what agency and why. I wonder how this will impact the jurors.
 
  • #639
  • #640
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
113
Guests online
2,446
Total visitors
2,559

Forum statistics

Threads
632,542
Messages
18,628,231
Members
243,191
Latest member
MrsFancyGoar
Back
Top