MISTRIAL MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #18

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bertsche said forcing Voss to hand her off-the-record notes to prosecutors would hurt her credibility as an investigative journalist.

Cannone's new ruling says the prosecution can have audio recordings of on-the-record conversations, but not the reporter's off-the-record notes. The judge acknowledged support for Voss from the Massachusetts Newspaper Publishers Association, the New England First Amendment Coalition and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
 

At this morning keynote during Realscreen in Miami, Jason Sarlanis, president of TNT, TBS, TruTV, ID & HLN, Linear and Streaming at Warner Bros. Discovery, unveiled new multi-part docuseries A Body In The Snow: The Trial Of Karen Read, set to premiere on Investigation Discovery over three nights on March 17-19, 2025

I hope that it helps her out of this financial mess.
 
If this stops a retrial of KR then the investigation is still open, right. Is the death of JOK ever going to be solved???

The objective of KR's defense is not only to end the retrial but to also get the charges against KR dismissed with prejudice so the CW can't ever charge KR for JOK's death again. Since the police nor the CW did not investigate or pursue any other suspect except for KR, I doubt they will solve this. MOO
 
If this stops a retrial of KR then the investigation is still open, right. Is the death of JOK ever going to be solved???

Sadly, I believe the judge will do everything in her power to keep this retrial on track. But, if anything because of today we have a trial run of the mistrial/motion to dismiss yet to come. ( Due in Two weeks ) Hearing on March 4th.

What was announced in court today, the defense was just given additional Sally port video which now shows KR's vehicle BACKING IN to the sally port. Just where did this come from? We were told that the defense had everything?

Sadly, also we will never know what happened to JOK, due to the MA Keystone coppers lack of investigation .
 
Sadly, I believe the judge will do everything in her power to keep this retrial on track. But, if anything because of today we have a trial run of the mistrial/motion to dismiss yet to come. ( Due in Two weeks ) Hearing on March 4th.

What was announced in court today, the defense was just given additional Sally port video which now shows KR's vehicle BACKING IN to the sally port. Just where did this come from? We were told that the defense had everything?

Sadly, also we will never know what happened to JOK, due to the MA Keystone coppers lack of investigation .

I think it's HUGE that the CW held back the sally port video of KRs' car BACKING into the garage. It's yet another manipulation!!! Funny how all the video evidence of KR's car passing by certain cameras ( The library, neighbor's ring cams, the sally port) that would show the tailight in tact, all magically didn't record, disappeared or were manipulated!! Just like all those butt dials, it's just another set of coincidences! How can anyone knowing this believe that the CW is being completely honest, forthright, and on the level???!
 
The evidence which would have proved who killed John O'Keefe has been destroyed either through incompetence or corruption. More likely the latter.

JMO
Learning today that Canton PD retained video on an unknown cloud that was allegedly unknown to the CW and the defense is absolutely insane! Nonetheless-- this does not excuse the CW from their obligation to produce evidence to the defense from their own PD. And yes, likely corruption! JMO
 

2/6/25

MOTIONS HEARING: Boyfriend Cop Murder Trial — MA v. Karen Read​

I couldn't stay away after all. Interrupting my watching. Brennan has just begun his opposition. I want to say one thing at this point; Brennan knows he's in the wrong but he is an absolute snake. IMO .

Deja vu from trial x1. AJ's sincerity and passion vs Lally's obtuseness and monotony. And now we have Brennan's crafty gaslighting and displacement vs AJ's straight forward clarity and genuineness. What on earth is driving the CW to continue on with this farce and defend the indefensible conduct revealed here? Brennan is a 'special' prosecutor brought in by CW to maintain and push forward the farce huh? Well he is a snake! Jmo.
 
(Snipped) What on earth is driving the CW to continue on with this farce and defend the indefensible conduct revealed here? Brennan is a 'special' prosecutor brought in by CW to maintain and push forward the farce huh? Well he is a snake! Jmo.
I have been asking myself this question for awhile now!

I have to believe the State of Mass is prone to bringing cases to trial that do not belong anywhere near a courthouse and NOT bringing cases to trial that are obviously in need of adjudication (Birchmore for example).
 
I have to believe the State of Mass is prone to bringing cases to trial that do not belong anywhere near a courthouse and NOT bringing cases to trial that are obviously in need of adjudication (Birchmore for example).

I'd add to the end of your sentence "when cops are potentially criminally involved."

There does seem to be a compulsive need in Norfolk County to protect law enforcement at all cost.
 
I'd add to the end of your sentence "when cops are potentially criminally involved."

There does seem to be a compulsive need in Norfolk County to protect law enforcement at all cost.

And not to pile on, but what is it with Judge Cannone who seems to act like she's completely void of any knowledge of the American Bar Association's basic rules of discovery which have long served as the staple and/or backbone for the State and Federal Discovery Rules where the buck stops with the District Attorney.

Pursuant to MA Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 14, and the ABA, this includes the collection of evidence from local and state police, Special Investigators, etc. where the rules of the prosecutor include collecting evidence from the police and making timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by a protective order of the tribunal;


Instead of acknowledging that exculpatory evidence was retained in a cloud by a police officer, and not discovered timely to the defense, Cannone was more concerned about if/ when the defense filed a discovery request and/or a request for preservation of evidence in Norfolk County. Seriously? These are implied duties of the CW with or without the defense Motion! I truly commend the defense teams patience today.



(a) The prosecutor’s obligations​

(1) The prosecution team​

For the purposes of this rule, the prosecution team includes all persons under the prosecuting office’s direction and control, or persons who have participated in investigating or evaluating the case and either regularly report to the prosecuting office or have done so in the case. The prosecution team includes but is not limited to:

  • (A) Personnel of police departments or other law enforcement agencies who were or are involved in the investigation of the case, before or after charges were issued, or were or are involved in the prosecution of the case;
  • (B) Personnel of other governmental agencies who, in conjunction or collaboration with the prosecutor, were or are involved in the investigation or prosecution of the case;
  • (C) Forensic analysts, crime laboratory personnel, and criminalists employed or retained by state or local government who were or are involved in the investigation or prosecution of the case;
  • (D) Victim witness advocates and investigators employed by the prosecuting office; and
  • (E) Members of joint state and federal law enforcement task forces who were or are involved in the investigation or prosecution of the case.

(2) The prosecutor’s duties to inform and inquire, collect and disclose, preserve and notify, and record​

(A)​

The prosecutor has a duty in each case to inform each member of the prosecution team whom the prosecutor has reason to believe may be in possession of items or information subject to this rule of the discovery and preservation obligations required by this rule, and to inquire of each such person as to the existence of any such items or information.

(B)​

The prosecutor has a duty in each case to collect and to disclose to the defense all items and information required by this rule that are in the possession, custody, or control of the prosecutor, the prosecuting office, or any member of the prosecution team.

(C)​

When the prosecutor learns of items or information subject to disclosure which cannot be promptly copied or made available for inspection by the defense, the prosecutor has a duty to promptly notify the defense of the existence, and if known the location, of those items or information, and to instruct an appropriate member of the prosecution team to preserve those items or information until they can be disclosed.

(D)​

When the prosecutor learns of items subject to disclosure that have been destroyed, lost, altered, or which have otherwise become unavailable, or items or information subject to disclosure that a member of the team will not provide the prosecutor, the prosecutor has a duty to promptly notify the defense of the destruction, loss, alteration, or unavailability of the items or the refusal to provide the items or information.

(E)​

The judge may inquire of the prosecutor what actions were taken to achieve compliance with this rule.

[..]
 
And not to pile on, but what is it with Judge Cannone who seems to act like she's completely void of any knowledge of the American Bar Association's basic rules of discovery which have long served as the staple and/or backbone for the State and Federal Discovery Rules where the buck stops with the District Attorney.

Pursuant to MA Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 14, and the ABA, this includes the collection of evidence from local and state police, Special Investigators, etc. where the rules of the prosecutor include collecting evidence from the police and making timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by a protective order of the tribunal;


Instead of acknowledging that exculpatory evidence was retained in a cloud by a police officer, and not discovered timely to the defense, Cannone was more concerned about if/ when the defense filed a discovery request and/or a request for preservation of evidence in Norfolk County. Seriously? These are implied duties of the CW with or without the defense Motion! I truly commend the defense teams patience today.



(a) The prosecutor’s obligations​

(1) The prosecution team​

For the purposes of this rule, the prosecution team includes all persons under the prosecuting office’s direction and control, or persons who have participated in investigating or evaluating the case and either regularly report to the prosecuting office or have done so in the case. The prosecution team includes but is not limited to:

  • (A) Personnel of police departments or other law enforcement agencies who were or are involved in the investigation of the case, before or after charges were issued, or were or are involved in the prosecution of the case;
  • (B) Personnel of other governmental agencies who, in conjunction or collaboration with the prosecutor, were or are involved in the investigation or prosecution of the case;
  • (C) Forensic analysts, crime laboratory personnel, and criminalists employed or retained by state or local government who were or are involved in the investigation or prosecution of the case;
  • (D) Victim witness advocates and investigators employed by the prosecuting office; and
  • (E) Members of joint state and federal law enforcement task forces who were or are involved in the investigation or prosecution of the case.

(2) The prosecutor’s duties to inform and inquire, collect and disclose, preserve and notify, and record​

(A)​

The prosecutor has a duty in each case to inform each member of the prosecution team whom the prosecutor has reason to believe may be in possession of items or information subject to this rule of the discovery and preservation obligations required by this rule, and to inquire of each such person as to the existence of any such items or information.

(B)​

The prosecutor has a duty in each case to collect and to disclose to the defense all items and information required by this rule that are in the possession, custody, or control of the prosecutor, the prosecuting office, or any member of the prosecution team.

(C)​

When the prosecutor learns of items or information subject to disclosure which cannot be promptly copied or made available for inspection by the defense, the prosecutor has a duty to promptly notify the defense of the existence, and if known the location, of those items or information, and to instruct an appropriate member of the prosecution team to preserve those items or information until they can be disclosed.

(D)​

When the prosecutor learns of items subject to disclosure that have been destroyed, lost, altered, or which have otherwise become unavailable, or items or information subject to disclosure that a member of the team will not provide the prosecutor, the prosecutor has a duty to promptly notify the defense of the destruction, loss, alteration, or unavailability of the items or the refusal to provide the items or information.

(E)​

The judge may inquire of the prosecutor what actions were taken to achieve compliance with this rule.

[..]
Yes, agree re Judge Cannone,! It's like she is mis-directing here, with nit picking irrelevant details, from the giant Brady violation which is no longer an Elephant in the room but an issue brought directly into the room by AJ. Jmo

Just like Brennan. I mean, how smarmy of him to try and focus the court on his apparent courtesy and good manners,! When he is the CW in representative form and he is now responsible for ensuring defense receive evidence which has obviously been held back by Canton PD for many years. And continues to be held back. When the defense expert went to download, get this original evidence, it was the CW's responsibility to provide it. It was not provided, and agents of the CW knew it was not available on the system to he provided. Brennan failed to inform himself of this when defense had legitimate expectation. Jmo

AJ had to point out, this isn't about how 'courteous' Brennan claims to be, this is not all about Mr Brennan!. As an aside, people who are being sincere and courteous are simply sincere and courteous. They don't have to keep irrelevantly harping on about how courteous they are. Red flag for distraction in action!! IMO

And what this means as far as Canton PD is concerned is literally mind blowing imo. Remember all that bizzo regarding how they recused themselves early from the case? Yet IIRC some Canton officer drove by 32 Fairview and happened to see some tail light pieces glittering in the sun one day? And correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't there a Canton PD person actually present at the Sally Port in one of the videos ( the inverted manipulated one) when the Lexus was there? Please, someone on top of the details, correct me if I'm misremembering. Jmo

EBM clarifying.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Keep Websleuths Free

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
53
Guests online
2,547
Total visitors
2,600

Forum statistics

Threads
619,328
Messages
18,396,440
Members
238,423
Latest member
100miles
Back
Top