MISTRIAL MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #19

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #901
SBM. He openly admitted to going after JOK's girl(Karen) behind his back with no remorse or apologies for it. I apparently have a different definition of what a friend is. IMO it proves that he certainly had no loyalty to JOK.
You’re confused.
It was KAREN READ who initiated contact and pursued him.
 
  • #902
You’re confused.
It was KAREN READ who initiated contact and pursuit him.

Uh the texts messages sure don't read like he was the one being pursued.
 
  • #903
Has it ever occurred to you that KR might know something about these people through her relationship with JOK (and Higgins) that she hasn't spoken up about that led her to come to this conclusion they might be involved?
MOO
No.
IMO that’s ridiculous given her willingness to smear EVERYONE for her own benefit.

She literally mocked the mother of John O’Keefe

(A body in the snow - in her own words)
 
  • #904
Uh the texts messages sure don't read like he was the one being pursued.
You mean he was confused after she ghosted him after pursuing him?
Who wouldnt be?

After
She contacted him
She kissed him
She invited him to her home
 
  • #905
You’re confused.
It was KAREN READ who initiated contact and pursuit him.
It was mutual. Higgins was driving and lurking around John's home in the hopes of running into Karen, (as attracted people sometimes do) and he did pursue her one day from his car. He was "just driving" down John's road one day and saw Karen in the yard and yelled out to her. She didn't recognize him and told him she was married (I'm paraphrasing). He actively searched her out.
Following that, he pretended to be a good friend of John, coming over to watch sports, and so on, when his real motivation was to get closer to Karen. It was so obvious from the evidence and his testimony.
MOO
Edited for clarity
 
Last edited:
  • #906
No.
IMO that’s ridiculous given her willingness to smear EVERYONE for her own benefit.

She literally mocked the mother of John O’Keefe

(A body in the snow - in her own words)
If you’re saying it’s her own words, please link those words.
 
  • #907
No.
IMO that’s ridiculous given her willingness to smear EVERYONE for her own benefit.

She literally mocked the mother of John O’Keefe

(A body in the snow - in her own words)
It really isn't ridiculous though when you think about it critically.
 
  • #908
You mean he was confused after she ghosted him after pursuing him?
Who wouldnt be?

After
She contacted him
She kissed him
She invited him to her home

Nope, that's not what I mean at all.
 
  • #909
  • #910
If you’re saying it’s her own words, please link those words.
You didn’t watch the documentary?

Here ya go

 
  • #911
You didn’t watch the documentary?

Here ya go


No, we watched the trial. It's the one way you can actually get unbiased information. JMO
 
  • #912
You didn’t watch the documentary?

Here ya go

Firstly, you linked me to a platform that requires a subscription to watch. You have said repeatedly that you did watch the doco. Do you not remember exactly what Karen Read said? You can’t go back and find it?
 
  • #913
You didn’t watch the documentary?

Here ya go

That's not a link to her words though. Not everyone can watch the full documentary so the exact words she used that you're referring to would be appreciated.
 
  • #914
That's not a link to her words though. Not everyone can watch the full documentary so the exact words she used that you're referring to would be appreciated.
I believe you can get the gist from this news article. There's a point at which KR apparently adopts the accusatory voice of JOK's mother, which could be construed as mocking, and a point at which she says, "They're all lying", which can certainly be construed as smearing.


KR's shattered tail light pieces are at the scene. Unless all of those pieces were planted, including those found by SERT that Trooper Proctor had absolutely, positively no opportunity to plant, it is KR who is not telling the truth. And willing to smear.
 
  • #915
I believe you can get the gist from this news article. There's a point at which KR apparently adopts the accusatory voice of JOK's mother, which could be construed as mocking, and a point at which she says, "They're all lying", which can certainly be construed as smearing.


KR's shattered tail light pieces are at the scene. Unless all of those pieces were planted, including those found by SERT that Trooper Proctor had absolutely, positively no opportunity to plant, it is KR who is not telling the truth. And willing to smear.

Yeah except she backed her car into another car that same day.
 
  • #916
Remember his whereabouts are unknown for an hour around the murder. His claim that he was driving to the PD is a transparent lie.

The commonwealth had ample reason to subpoena his phone which would have given away his real location.
So glad someone else finds his departure time from 34 Fairview and arrival time at Canton PD extremely suspect! I was all over that during 1st trial but eventually let it go since defense did not follow up on it. Very disappointing and hopefully this is explored further in the 2nd trial.
 
  • #917
Yeah except she backed her car into another car that same day.
That would not explain the tail light pieces at the alleged crime scene. Including those found by SERT.
 
  • #918
Yeah except she backed her car into another car that same day.
Because I’m sure a special someone will ask for a source:
What to know about the Karen Read murder case and her first murder trial

“She backed into O’Keefe’s car, Yannetti said, in an event that was captured on security camera. He added that authorities did not find the broken pieces of taillight during an initial search of Albert’s yard. They only began finding them later in the day, after Read’s car had been seized, Yannetti said.”

I can’t find the footage right now, but did see it in the most recent Dateline episode on the case. The security footage is from JOK’s home. JOK’s car is in the driveway, and KR clearly bumps him with her back taillight as she leaves. The footage was also shown in the first trial.
 
  • #919
I believe you can get the gist from this news article. There's a point at which KR apparently adopts the accusatory voice of JOK's mother, which could be construed as mocking, and a point at which she says, "They're all lying", which can certainly be construed as smearing.


KR's shattered tail light pieces are at the scene. Unless all of those pieces were planted, including those found by SERT that Trooper Proctor had absolutely, positively no opportunity to plant, it is KR who is not telling the truth. And willing to smear.
Is this it?


It happened the day after John’s death in January 2022, when Karen and her father, William Read, went over to John’s house to see his family. While at the home, Karen asked John’s Brother, Paul O’Keefe, what John looked like when they identified his body.

“‘My brother looked like he went five rounds with Tyson,’” Karen recalled Paul telling her.

“And his mother leans over the kitchen island and says to me, ‘I think he looks like he got hit by a car. He looks like he got hit by a car,’” Karen continued, impersonating Peggy’s accusatory tone. “I’m like, wait a minute, were you both looking at the same body?”
 
  • #920
Because I’m sure a special someone will ask for a source:
What to know about the Karen Read murder case and her first murder trial

“She backed into O’Keefe’s car, Yannetti said, in an event that was captured on security camera. He added that authorities did not find the broken pieces of taillight during an initial search of Albert’s yard. They only began finding them later in the day, after Read’s car had been seized, Yannetti said.”

I can’t find the footage right now, but did see it in the most recent Dateline episode on the case. The security footage is from JOK’s home. JOK’s car is in the driveway, and KR clearly bumps him with her back taillight as she leaves. The footage was also shown in the first trial.
The timing of the seizure of KR's vehicle in Dighton and its return to Canton PD was such that there was no possibility of pieces of KR's tail light finding their way to the alleged crime scene prior to SERT''s search.

That is why, IMO, the first jury was sufficiently focused on the SERT search to request a written SERT report, after the case had been submitted to them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
71
Guests online
812
Total visitors
883

Forum statistics

Threads
635,617
Messages
18,680,702
Members
243,327
Latest member
MindMaven
Back
Top