The role of the defense attorney is to advocate for their client, which sometimes involves challenging witness testimony. While the process can be tough, it’s all part of ensuring a fair trial.
The state has tried repeatedly to discredit defense evidence rather than address its substance. This latest move is no different. It’s posturing. Unless they can show that the accident reconstruction was secretly paid for or otherwise employed by the defense (which they haven’t), this is yet another procedural slap fight from Hank. MOO.
From what I remember a few months back, Brennan knew there was more communication that hadn't been disclosed from the context of defence communications with ARCCA that were disclosed. He said more recently that if the defence were saying they no longer had them, he should be able to ask the witnesses to be told to bring them with them to court, so that when they are on the stand they don't turn around and say they don't have them to hand.
Bederow Law
@Bederowlaw
This witness was bad for the DA because he has no credibility; at best he was exposed as entirely unreliable. That he claimed that his memory improved from one year ago (and after he met with Brennan and Tully) hardly helps. Saying he didn't mention that he overheard Karen say "I hit him" to others is not a good luck--for him or Brennan. Why wasn't he asked on direct? The jury won't ignore how adamant he was last year about the "puffy jacket." I do think an opportunity was missed by not asking the witness if he, Brennan and Tully discussed the other/overheard "I hit him" evidence in these prep sessions where he was told to "tell the truth." Seems hard to believe this wouldn't have been brought out in direct if the prosecution knew of this.
12:43 PM · Apr 22, 2025
·
What is arcca?
arcca.com
That of itself should make it clear the cw is desperate. JMOO
